Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Expert feedback lays the foundation of rigorous research.
A mathematical theory of communication
Shannon, C. E · 1948
Earlier work this paper cites.
The automatic creation of literature abstracts
Luhn, H. P · 1958
Earlier work this paper cites.
The structure of scientifi revolutions
Kuhn, T. S · 1962
Earlier work this paper cites.
Little science, big science (Columbia University Press, 1963)
Price, D. J. D. S · 1963
Earlier work this paper cites.
The matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered
Merton, R. K · 1968
Earlier work this paper cites.
New methods in automatic extracting
Edmundson, H. P · 1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
Energy and information
Tribus, M. & McIrvine, E. C · 1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
Indexing by latent semantic analysis
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K. & Harshman, R · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at annals of internal medicine
Goodman, S. N., Berlin, J., Fletcher, S. W. & Fletcher, R. H · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Textrank: Bringing order into text
Mihalcea, R. & Tarau, P · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Lexrank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization
Erkan, G. & Radev, D. R · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reviewing peer review (2008)
Alberts, B., Hanson, B. & Kelner, K. L · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder?
Jones, B. F · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A quick guide to writing a solid peer review
Nicholas, K. A. & Gordon, W. S · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dynamic pooling and unfolding recursive autoencoders for paraphrase detection
Socher, R., Huang, E., Pennin, J., Manning, C. D. & Ng, A · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
Björk, B.-C. & Solomon, D · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bias in peer review
Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G. & Cronin, B · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
Bowman, S. R., Angeli, G., Potts, C. & Manning, C. D · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Household surveys in crisis
Meyer, B. D., Mok, W. K. & Sullivan, J. X · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: Strong imbalance in the collective enterprise
Kovanis, M., Porcher, R., Ravaud, P. & Trinquart, L · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)
Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., Van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S. & Wicherts, J. M · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A supervised approach to extractive summarisation of scientific papers
Collins, E., Augenstein, I. & Riedel, S · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
Horbach, S. P. & Halffman, W · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Cultural reproduction and social reproduction
Bourdieu, P · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Are ideas getting harder to find?
Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J. & Webb, M · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Language models are few-shot learners
Brown, T. et al · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Women are credited less in science than men
Ross, M. B. et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Nature 603
Nature is trialling transparent peer review - the early results are encouraging · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Investigating fairness disparities in peer review: A language model enhanced approach
Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Deng, Z. & Roth, D · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI · 2023
Closest in time.
Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum
Ayers, J. W. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Performance of chatgpt on usmle: Potential for ai-assisted medical education using large language models
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Nature will publish peer review reports as a trial · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
An online platform for interactive feedback in biomedical machine learning
Abid, A. et al · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B. & Holcombe, A. O · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science
Chu, J. S. & Evans, J. A · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
How to review for ACL Rolling Review
Rogers, A. & Augenstein, I · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
ACL-IJCNLP 2021 Instructions for Reviewers
Association for Computational Linguistics · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Kung, T. H. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Would chat gpt3 get a wharton mba? a prediction based on its performance in the operations management course
Terwiesch, C · 2023
Closest in time.
Reviewergpt? an exploratory study on using large language models for paper reviewing
Liu, R. & Shah, N. B · 2023
Closest in time.
Gpt4 is slightly helpful for peer-review assistance: A pilot study
Robertson, Z · 2023
Closest in time.
How to Write a Report
Nature · 2023
Closest in time.
Writing Your Report
Nature Communications · 2023
Closest in time.
ACL’23 Peer Review Policies
Association for Computational Linguistics · 2023
Closest in time.
ICML 2023 Reviewer Tutorial
International Conference on Machine Learning · 2023
Closest in time.
Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence
Noy, S. & Zhang, W · 2023
Closest in time.
The impact of ai on developer productivity: Evidence from github copilot
Peng, S., Kalliamvakou, E., Cihon, P. & Demirer, M · 2023
Closest in time.
Art and the science of generative ai
Epstein, Z. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence
Wang, H. et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Sciencebeam—using computer vision to extract pdf data
Ecer, D. & Maciocci, G · 2023
Closest in time.
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? considerations and recommendations for use of chatgpt and other large language models in scholarly peer review
Hosseini, M. & Horbach, S. P · 2023
Closest in time.
Chatgpt identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review
Verharen, J. P · 2023
Closest in time.