Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Traditional optimizing compilers have played an important role in adapting to the growing complexity of modern software systems.
The NAS parallel benchmarks—summary and preliminary results. In Proceedings of the 1991 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing . 158–165
David H Bailey, Eric Barszcz, John T Barton, David S Browning, Robert L Carter, Leonardo Dagum, Rod A Fatoohi, Paul O Frederickson, Thomas A Lasinski, Rob S Schreiber, et al · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
A machine learning approach to automatic production of compiler heuristics. In Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications: 10th International Conference, AIMSA 2002 Varna, Bulgaria, September 4–6, 2002 Proceedings 10 . Springer, 41–50
Antoine Monsifrot, François Bodin, and Rene Quiniou. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Min Zhao, Bruce R Childers, and Mary Lou Soffa. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
The ROSE source-to-source compiler infrastructure. In Cetus users and compiler infrastructure workshop, in conjunction with PACT , Vol. 2011. Citeseer, 1
Dan Quinlan and Chunhua Liao. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
The cetus source-to-source compiler infrastructure: overview and evaluation
Hansang Bae, Dheya Mustafa, Jae-Woo Lee, Aurangzeb, Hao Lin, Chirag Dave, Rudolf Eigenmann, and Samuel P Midkiff. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Feature mining for machine learning based compilation optimization. In 2014 Eighth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing . IEEE, 207–214
Fengqian Li, Feilong Tang, and Yao Shen. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Identifying pitfalls in automatic parallelization of NAS parallel benchmarks. In 2017 National Conference on Parallel Computing Technologies (PARCOMPTECH) . IEEE, 1–6
S Prema, R Jehadeesan, and BK Panigrahi. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
There’s plenty of room at the Top: What will drive computer performance after Moore’s law?
Charles E. Leiserson, Neil C. Thompson, Joel S. Emer, Bradley C. Kuszmaul, Butler W. Lampson, Daniel Sanchez, and Tao B. Schardl. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Program synthesis with large language models
Jacob Austin, Augustus Odena, Maxwell Nye, Maarten Bosma, Henryk Michalewski, David Dohan, Ellen Jiang, Carrie Cai, Michael Terry, Quoc Le, et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluating large language models trained on code
Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reframing Instructional Prompts to GPTk’s Language
Swaroop Mishra, Daniel Khashabi, Chitta Baral, Yejin Choi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
PolyBenchC-4.2.1
T. Yuki and L.N. Pouchet. [n. d.] · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic and interactive program parallelization using the Cetus source to source compiler infrastructure v2. 0
Akshay Bhosale, Parinaz Barakhshan, Miguel Romero Rosas, and Rudolf Eigenmann. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Gpt-neox-20b: An open-source autoregressive language model
Sid Black, Stella Biderman, Eric Hallahan, Quentin Anthony, Leo Gao, Laurence Golding, Horace He, Connor Leahy, Kyle McDonell, Jason Phang, et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
InstructDial: Improving zero and few-shot generalization in dialogue through instruction tuning
Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code
Wenhan Xiong Grattafiori, Alexandre Défossez, Jade Copet, Faisal Azhar, Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Nicolas Usunier, Thomas Scialom, and Gabriel Synnaeve. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Advising openmp parallelization via a graph-based approach with transformers. In International Workshop on OpenMP . Springer, 3–17
Tal Kadosh, Nadav Schneider, Niranjan Hasabnis, Timothy Mattson, Yuval Pinter, and Gal Oren. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Starcoder: may the source be with you!
Raymond Li, Loubna Ben Allal, Yangtian Zi, Niklas Muennighoff, Denis Kocetkov, Chenghao Mou, Marc Marone, Christopher Akiki, Jia Li, Jenny Chim, et al · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Jiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, and Lingming Zhang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Prakhar Gupta, Cathy Jiao, Yi-Ting Yeh, Shikib Mehri, Maxine Eskenazi, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Competition-level code generation with alphacode
Yujia Li, David Choi, Junyoung Chung, Nate Kushman, Julian Schrittwieser, Rémi Leblond, Tom Eccles, James Keeling, Felix Gimeno, Agustin Dal Lago, et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh (Eds.), Vol. 35. Curran Associates, Inc., 24824–24837
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, brian ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Limits for learning with language models
Nicholas Asher, Swarnadeep Bhar, Akshay Chaturvedi, Julie Hunter, and Soumya Paul. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Lm4hpc: Towards effective language model application in high-performance computing. In International Workshop on OpenMP . Springer, 18–33
Le Chen, Pei-Hung Lin, Tristan Vanderbruggen, Chunhua Liao, Murali Emani, and Bronis de Supinski. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
CaRV–Accelerating Program Optimization through Capture, Replay, Validate. In Proceedings of the SC’23 Workshops of The International Conference on High Performance Computing, Network, Storage, and Analysis . 654–662
Parinaz Barakhshan and Rudolf Eigenmann. 2023a
Cited in the paper.
Learning from Automatically Versus Manually Parallelized NAS Benchmarks. In International Workshop on Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing . Springer, 29–46
Parinaz Barakhshan and Rudolf Eigenmann. 2023b
Cited in the paper.
Daniel Nichols, Aniruddha Marathe, Harshitha Menon, Todd Gamblin, and Abhinav Bhatele. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Learning performance-improving code edits
Alexander Shypula, Aman Madaan, Yimeng Zeng, Uri Alon, Jacob Gardner, Milad Hashemi, Graham Neubig, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, Osbert Bastani, and Amir Yazdanbakhsh. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Comparing Llama-2 and GPT-3 LLMs for HPC kernels generation
Pedro Valero-Lara, Alexis Huante, Mustafa Al Lail, William F Godoy, Keita Teranishi, Prasanna Balaprakash, and Jeffrey S Vetter. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Compiler generated feedback for Large Language Models
Dejan Grubisic, Chris Cummins, Volker Seeker, and Hugh Leather. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Parallelizable Loop Detection using Pre-trained Transformer Models for Code Understanding. In Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies , Ji Su Park, Hiroyuki Takizawa, Hong Shen, and James J. Park (Eds.). Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 32–42
Soratouch Pornmaneerattanatri, Keichi Takahashi, Yutaro Kashiwa, Kohei Ichikawa, and Hajimu Iida. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.