Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Commit message is one of the most important textual information in software development and maintenance.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al · 1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Properties of cross-entropy minimization
John Shore and Rodney Johnson. 1981 · 1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) . ACL, 311–318
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summarization Branches Out . ACL, 74–81
Chin-Yew Lin. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization . ACL, 65–72
Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Code Summarization via Hybrid GNN
Shangqing Liu, Yu Chen, Xiaofei Xie, Jingkai Siow, and Yang Liu. 2021 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Probabilistic Relevance Framework: BM25 and Beyond
Stephen Robertson and Hugo Zaragoza. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering
Per Runeson and Martin Höst. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatically documenting program changes. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) . ACM, 33–42
Raymond P.L. Buse and Westley R. Weimer. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Can development work describe itself?. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 191–200
Walid Maalej and Hans-Jörg Happel. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
ChangeScribe: A Tool for Automatically Generating Commit Messages. In Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . IEEE, 709–712
Mario Linares-Vásquez, Luis Fernando Cortés-Coy, Jairo Aponte, and Denys Poshyvanyk. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
On Automatic Summarization of What and Why Information in Source Code Changes. In Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) . IEEE, 103–112
Jinfeng Shen, Xiaobing Sun, Bin Li, Hui Yang, and Jiajun Hu. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatically generating commit messages from diffs using neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) . IEEE, 135–146
Siyuan Jiang, Ameer Armaly, and Collin McMillan. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A Neural Architecture for Generating Natural Language Descriptions from Source Code Changes. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) . ACL, 287–292
Pablo Loyola, Edison Marrese-Taylor, and Yutaka Matsuo. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Attention is all you need
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural-machine-translation-based commit message generation: how far are we?. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) . ACM, 373–384
Zhongxin Liu, Xin Xia, Ahmed E. Hassan, David Lo, Zhenchang Xing, and Xinyu Wang. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Generating Commit Messages from Diffs using Pointer-Generator Network. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) . IEEE, 299–309
Qin Liu, Zihe Liu, Hongming Zhu, Hongfei Fan, Bowen Du, and Yu Qian. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Commit message generation for source code changes. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) . IJCAI, 3975–3981
Shengbin Xu, Yuan Yao, Feng Xu, Tianxiao Gu, Hanghang Tong, and Jian Lu. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP): Findings . ACL, 1536–1547
Zhangyin Feng, Daya Guo, Duyu Tang, Nan Duan, Xiaocheng Feng, Ming Gong, Linjun Shou, Bing Qin, Ting Liu, Daxin Jiang, and Ming Zhou. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
CC2Vec: distributed representations of code changes. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . ACM, 518–529
Thong Hoang, Hong Jin Kang, David Lo, and Julia Lawall. 2020 · 2020
What makes a good commit message?. In Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . ACM, 2389–2401
Yingchen Tian, Yuxia Zhang, Klaas-Jan Stol, Lin Jiang, and Hui Liu. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Context-aware Retrieval-based Deep Commit Message Generation
Haoye Wang, Xin Xia, David Lo, Qiang He, Xinyu Wang, and John Grundy. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Less training, more repairing please: revisiting automated program repair via zero-shot learning. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) . ACM, 959–971
Chunqiu Steven Xia and Lingming Zhang. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Evalplus Leaderboard
2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A Survey on In-context Learning
Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Jingjing Xu, Lei Li, and Zhifang Sui. 2023 · 2023
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , Vol. 33. 9459–9474
Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Douwe Kiela. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Multi-task learning based pre-trained language model for code completion. In Proceedings of the 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) . ACM, 473–485
Fang Liu, Ge Li, Yunfei Zhao, and Zhi Jin. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Unified Pre-training for Program Understanding and Generation. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) . ACL, 2655–2668
Wasi Ahmad, Saikat Chakraborty, Baishakhi Ray, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Codexglue: A machine learning benchmark dataset for code understanding and generation
Shuai Lu, Daya Guo, Shuo Ren, Junjie Huang, Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Ambrosio Blanco, Colin Clement, Dawn Drain, Daxin Jiang, Duyu Tang, et al · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Retrieval Augmented Code Generation and Summarization. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP): Findings . ACL, 2719–2734
Md Rizwan Parvez, Wasi Ahmad, Saikat Chakraborty, Baishakhi Ray, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generation. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) . ACL, 8696–8708
Yue Wang, Weishi Wang, Shafiq Joty, and Steven C.H. Hoi. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners
Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M Dai, and Quoc V Le. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
FIRA: fine-grained graph-based code change representation for automated commit message generation. In Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . ACM, 970–981
Jinhao Dong, Yiling Lou, Qihao Zhu, Zeyu Sun, Zhilin Li, Wenjie Zhang, and Dan Hao. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
An Empirical Study on Fine-Tuning Large Language Models of Code for Automated Program Repair. In Proceedings of the 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) . IEEE, 1162–1174
Kai Huang, Xiangxin Meng, Jian Zhang, Yang Liu, Wenjie Wang, Shuhao Li, and Yuqing Zhang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
CodeT5+: Open Code Large Language Models for Code Understanding and Generation. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) . ACL, 1069–1088
Yue Wang, Hung Le, Akhilesh Gotmare, Nghi Bui, Junnan Li, and Steven Hoi. 2023a · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Apache Lucene
1999 · 2024
Closest in time.
ChatGPT, OpenAI
2022 · 2024
Closest in time.
Gemma, Google
2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Llama 3, Meta
2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Commit Messages in the Age of Large Language Models
Cristina V. Lopes, Vanessa I. Klotzman, Iris Ma, and Iftekar Ahmed. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
CommitBench
Maximilian Schall, Tamara Czinczoll, and Gerard de Melo. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Automated Commit Message Generation with Large Language Models: An Empirical Study and Beyond
Pengyu Xue, Linhao Wu, Zhongxing Yu, Zhi Jin, Zhen Yang, Xinyi Li, Zhenyu Yang, and Yue Tan. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Automatic Commit Message Generation: A Critical Review and Directions for Future Work
Yuxia Zhang, Zhiqing Qiu, Klaas-Jan Stol, Wenhui Zhu, Jiaxin Zhu, Yingchen Tian, and Hui Liu. 2024a · 2024
Closest in time.