Assessing the potential of deep learning for protein-ligand docking

Bank, P.D.: Protein data bank. Nature New Biol 233

1971

Earlier work this paper cites.

Rubner, Y., Tomasi, C., Guibas, L.J.: The earth mover’s distance as a metric for image retrieval. International journal of computer vision 40

2000

Earlier work this paper cites.

DeLano, W.L., et al

2002

Earlier work this paper cites.

Zhang, Y., Skolnick, J.: Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 57

2004

Earlier work this paper cites.

Hartshorn, M.J., Verdonk, M.L., Chessari, G., Brewerton, S.C., Mooij, W.T., Mortenson, P.N., Murray, C.W.: Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein- ligand docking performance. Journal of medicinal chemistry 50

2007

Earlier work this paper cites.

Eastman, P., Pande, V.: Openmm: A hardware-independent framework for molecular simulations. Computing in science & engineering 12

2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

Trott, O., Olson, A.J.: Autodock vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. Journal of computational chemistry 31

2010

Earlier work this paper cites.

Warren, G.L., Do, T.D., Kelley, B.P., Nicholls, A., Warren, S.D.: Essential considerations for using protein–ligand structures in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 17

2012

Earlier work this paper cites.

Mariani, V., Biasini, M., Barbato, A., Schwede, T.: lddt: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests. Bioinformatics 29

2013

Earlier work this paper cites.

Cheng, H., Schaeffer, R.D., Liao, Y., Kinch, L.N., Pei, J., Shi, S., Kim, B.-H., Grishin, N.V.: Ecod: an evolutionary classification of protein domains. PLoS computational biology 10

2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

Du, X., Li, Y., Xia, Y.-L., Ai, S.-M., Liang, J., Sang, P., Ji, X.-L., Liu, S.-Q.: Insights into protein–ligand interactions: mechanisms, models, and methods. International journal of molecular sciences 17

2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

Liu, Z., Su, M., Han, L., Liu, J., Yang, Q., Li, Y., Wang, R.: Forging the basis for developing protein–ligand interaction scoring functions. Accounts of chemical research 50

2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Krivák, R., Hoksza, D.: P2rank: machine learning based tool for rapid and accurate prediction of ligand binding sites from protein structure. Journal of cheminformatics 10

2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Leung, S., Bodkin, M., Delft, F., Brennan, P., Morris, G.: Sucos is better than rmsd for evaluating fragment elaboration and docking poses. ChemRxiv (2019)

2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T.E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al

2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

Bouysset, C., Fiorucci, S.: Prolif: a library to encode molecular interactions as fingerprints. Journal of cheminformatics 13

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

Dhakal, A., McKay, C., Tanner, J.J., Cheng, J.: Artificial intelligence in the prediction of protein–ligand interactions: recent advances and future directions. Briefings in Bioinformatics 23

2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

Corso, G., Stärk, H., Jing, B., Barzilay, R., Jaakkola, T.: Diffdock: Diffusion steps, twists, and turns for molecular docking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01776 (2022)

Original

2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

Stärk, H., Ganea, O., Pattanaik, L., Barzilay, R., Jaakkola, T.: Equibind: Geometric deep learning for drug binding structure prediction. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 20503–20521 (2022). PMLR

2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

Lu, W., Wu, Q., Zhang, J., Rao, J., Li, C., Zheng, S.: Tankbind: Trigonometry-aware neural networks for drug-protein binding structure prediction. Advances in neural information processing systems 35

2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

Harris, C., Didi, K., Jamasb, A.R., Joshi, C.K., Mathis, S.V., Lio, P., Blundell, T.: Benchmarking generated poses: How rational is structure-based drug design with generative models? arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07413 (2023)

Original

2023

Cited alongside, same era.

Zhang, X., Zhang, O., Shen, C., Qu, W., Chen, S., Cao, H., Kang, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, E., Zhang, J., et al

2023

Cited alongside, same era.

Masters, M., Mahmoud, A., Lill, M.: Fusiondock: Physics-informed diffusion model for molecular docking. In: ICML2023 CompBio Workshop (2023)

2023

Cited alongside, same era.

Plainer, M., Toth, M., Dobers, S., Stark, H., Corso, G., Marquet, C., Barzilay, R.: Diffdock-pocket: Diffusion for pocket-level docking with sidechain flexibility. NeurIPS 2023 Machine Learning in Structural Biology Workshop (2023)

2023

Cited alongside, same era.

Cao, D., Chen, M., Zhang, R., Wang, Z., Huang, M., Yu, J., Jiang, X., Fan, Z., Zhang, W., Zhou, H., et al.: Surfdock is a surface-informed diffusion generative model for reliable and accurate protein–ligand complex prediction. Nature Methods, 1–13 (2024)

2024

Closest in time.

Huang, Y., Zhang, O., Wu, L., Tan, C., Lin, H., Gao, Z., Li, S., Li, S., et al.: Re-dock: Towards flexible and realistic molecular docking with diffusion bridge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11459 (2024)

Original

2024

Closest in time.

Miñán, R., Sáenz, J.G., Molina, A., et al.: Geodirdock: Guiding docking along geodesic paths. In: ICLR 2024 Workshop on Generative and Experimental Perspectives for Biomolecular Design

2024

Closest in time.

Bryant, P., Kelkar, A., Guljas, A., Clementi, C., Noé, F.: Structure prediction of protein-ligand complexes from sequence information with umol. Nature Communications 15

2024

Closest in time.