Built on

E. Ó Colgáin, “A hint of matter underdensity at low z z ?,” JCAP 09
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. C. Wong, S. H. Suyu, G. C. F. Chen, C. E. Rusu, M. Millon, D. Sluse, V. Bonvin, C. D. Fassnacht, S. Taubenberger and M. W. Auger, et al
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Lewis, “GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,” [arXiv:1910.13970 [astro-ph.IM]]
Original
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Millon, A. Galan, F. Courbin, T. Treu, S. H. Suyu, X. Ding, S. Birrer, G. C. F. Chen, A. J. Shajib and D. Sluse, et al
Original
1912
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Alcock and B. Paczynski, “An evolution free test for non-zero cosmological constant,” Nature 281
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, “Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Krishnan, E. Ó Colgáin, Ruchika, A. A. Sen, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang, “Is there an early Universe solution to Hubble tension?,” Phys. Rev. D 102
Original
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. V. Linder, “Exploring the expansion history of the universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Khadka and B. Ratra, “Using quasar X-ray and UV flux measurements to constrain cosmological model parameters,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 497
Original
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. J. Eisenstein et al
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Cole et al
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Alam et al
Original
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Lusso, G. Risaliti, E. Nardini, G. Bargiacchi, M. Benetti, S. Bisogni, S. Capozziello, F. Civano, L. Eggleston and M. Elvis, et al
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. G. Dainotti, V. F. Cardone and S. Capozziello, “A time - luminosity correlation for Gamma Ray Bursts in the X - rays,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 391
Original
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. J. Shajib et al
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. P. Srinivasaragavan, M. G. Dainotti, N. Fraija, X. Hernandez, S. Nagataki, A. Lenart, L. Bowden and R. Wagner, “On the investigation of the closure relations for Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by Swift in the post-plateau phase and the GRB fundamental plane,” Astrophys. J. 903
Original
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Kazantzidis, H. Koo, S. Nesseris, L. Perivolaropoulos and A. Shafieloo, “Hints for possible low redshift oscillation around the best-fitting Λ \Lambda CDM model in the expansion history of the Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 501
Original
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Krishnan, E. Ó Colgáin, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang, “Running Hubble Tension and a H0 Diagnostic,” Phys. Rev. D 103
Original
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Khadka and B. Ratra, “Determining the range of validity of quasar X-ray and UV flux measurements for constraining cosmological model parameters,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 502
Original
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang and J. Goodman, “emcee: The MCMC Hammer,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125
Original
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Alam et al
Original
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, D. Sawant and L. Amati, “Cosmology with gamma-ray bursts: I. The Hubble diagram through the calibrated E p , i E_{\rm p,i} - E iso E_{\rm iso} correlation,” Astron. Astrophys. 598
Original
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, D. Sawant and L. Amati, Astron. Astrophys. 598
Original
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

G. Risaliti and E. Lusso, “Cosmological constraints from the Hubble diagram of quasars at high redshifts,” Nature Astron. 3
Original
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess and J. Silk, “In the realm of the Hubble tension: a review of solutions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38
Original
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Aghanim et al
Original
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
M. G. Dainotti, B. De Simone, T. Schiavone, G. Montani, E. Rinaldi and G. Lambiase, “On the Hubble constant tension in the SNe Ia Pantheon sample,” Astrophys. J. 912
Original
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Khadka, O. Luongo, M. Muccino and B. Ratra, “Do gamma-ray burst measurements provide a useful test of cosmological models?,” JCAP 09

Then

G. Bargiacchi, M. G. Dainotti, S. Nagataki and S. Capozziello, “Gamma-ray bursts, quasars, baryonic acoustic oscillations, and supernovae Ia: new statistical insights and cosmological constraints,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 521
Original
2023
Later among the works it cites.
S. Vagnozzi, “Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension,” Universe 9
Original
2023
Later among the works it cites.
A. Ł. Lenart, G. Bargiacchi, M. G. Dainotti, S. Nagataki and S. Capozziello, “A Bias-free Cosmological Analysis with Quasars Alleviating H 0
Original
2023
Later among the works it cites.
M. G. Dainotti, G. Bargiacchi, M. Bogdan, A. Ł. Lenart, K. Iwasaki, S. Capozziello, B. Zhang and N. Fraija, “Reducing the Uncertainty on the Hubble Constant up to 35% with an Improved Statistical Analysis: Different Best-fit Likelihoods for Type Ia Supernovae, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, Quasars, and Gamma-Ray Bursts,” Astrophys. J. 951
Original
2023
Later among the works it cites.

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2024

Does DESI 2024 Confirm $\Lambda$CDM?

Colgáin, Eoin Ó, Dainotti, Maria Giovanna, Capozziello, Salvatore et al.

Understand

We demonstrate that a $\sim 2 \sigma$ discrepancy with the Planck-$\Lambda$CDM cosmology in DESI Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) data in the redshift range $0.4 < z < 0.6$ with effective redshift $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ translates into an unexpectedly large $\Omega_m$ value, $\Omega_m = 0.67^{+0.18}_{-0.17}$.

We independently confirm that this anomaly drives the preference for $w_0 > -1$ in DESI data \textit{alone} confronted to the $w_0 w_a$CDM model.
Given that LRG data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ is at odds with Type Ia supernovae in overlapping redshifts, we expect that this anomaly will decrease in statistical significance with future DESI data releases leaving an increasing $\Omega_m$ trend with effective redshift at higher redshifts.
We estimate the current significance of the latter in DESI data at $\sim 1.8 \sigma$ and comment on how it dovetails with independent observations.