Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Though ML practitioners increasingly employ various Responsible ML (RML) strategies, their methodological approach in practice is still unclear.
Does fairness make a difference?
Marshall Sashkin and Richard L Williams. 1990 · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Justice and fairness
Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, T Shanks, and Michael J Meyer. 1990 · 1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
Value-sensitive design
Batya Friedman. 1996 · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reflective democracy
Robert E Goodin. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Heteroskedastic and Imbalanced Deep Learning with Adaptive Regularization
Kaidi Cao, Yining Chen, Junwei Lu, Nikos Arechiga, Adrien Gaidon, and Tengyu Ma. 2021 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Justice in ideal theory: A refutation
Colin Farrelly. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
The idea of justice
Amartya Sen. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
The value of philosophy in nonideal circumstances
Adam Swift. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
The imperative of integration
Elizabeth Anderson. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Realism in political theory
William A Galston. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Political realism: introduction
Richard North. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ideal and nonideal theory
A John Simmons. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Nonideal theory: What it is and what it needs to be
David Schmidtz. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Next steps for value sensitive design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1125–1134
Alan Borning and Michael Muller. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Challenges in predicting machine translation utility for human post-editors. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas: Research Papers
Michael Denkowski and Alon Lavie. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique
Sally Haslanger. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination
Faisal Kamiran and Toon Calders. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
The capability approach, technology and design: Taking stock and looking ahead
Ilse Oosterlaken. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Legitimacy in a Non-Ideal Key: A Critical Response to Andrew Mason
Matt Sleat. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ideal and nonideal theory
Zofia Stemplowska and Adam Swift. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis
Stefan Timmermans and Iddo Tavory. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: A conceptual map
Laura Valentini. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Flock: Hybrid crowd-machine learning classifiers. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing . 600–611
Justin Cheng and Michael S Bernstein. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Efficient and robust automated machine learning
Matthias Feurer, Aaron Klein, Katharina Eggensperger, Jost Springenberg, Manuel Blum, and Frank Hutter. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
The politics of measurement and action. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems . 3147–3156
Kathleen H Pine and Max Liboiron. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data-in-place: Thinking through the relations between data and community. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 2863–2872
Alex S Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan, David Sweeney, Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Lillie Grainger, and Jessica Lingel. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Against ideal guidance
David Wiens. 2015a · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Political ideals and the feasibility frontier
David Wiens. 2015b · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows
Jo Bates, Yu-Wei Lin, and Paula Goodale. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
The social side of software platform ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 3204–3214
Cleidson RB de Souza, Fernando Figueira Filho, Müller Miranda, Renato Pina Ferreira, Christoph Treude, and Leif Singer. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
What do we want from a theory of justice?
Sen Amartya. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Optimized pre-processing for discrimination prevention
Flavio Calmon, Dennis Wei, Bhanukiran Vinzamuri, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, and Kush R Varshney. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Revolt: Collaborative crowdsourcing for labeling machine learning datasets. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 2334–2346
Joseph Chee Chang, Saleema Amershi, and Ece Kamar. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Responsible artificial intelligence: designing AI for human values
Virginia Dignum. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
UX design innovation: Challenges for working with machine learning as a design material. In Proceedings of the 2017 chi conference on human factors in computing systems . 278–288
Graham Dove, Kim Halskov, Jodi Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A design perspective on data. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 2952–2963
Melanie Feinberg. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Critique and contribute: A practice-based framework for improving critical data studies and data science
Gina Neff, Anissa Tanweer, Brittany Fiore-Gartland, and Laura Osburn. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data vision: Learning to see through algorithmic abstraction. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing . 2436–2447
Samir Passi and Steven Jackson. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pros and cons of different sampling techniques
Gaganpreet Sharma. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
The story in the notebook: Exploratory data science using a literate programming tool. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–11
Mary Beth Kery, Marissa Radensky, Mahima Arya, Bonnie E John, and Brad A Myers. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Prediction-based decisions and fairness: A catalogue of choices, assumptions, and definitions
Shira Mitchell, Eric Potash, Solon Barocas, Alexander D’Amour, and Kristian Lum. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Trust in Data Science: Collaboration, Translation, and Accountability in Corporate Data Science Projects
Samir Passi and Steven J. Jackson. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Broken data: Conceptualising data in an emerging world
Sarah Pink, Minna Ruckenstein, Robert Willim, and Melisa Duque. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Investigating how experienced UX designers effectively work with machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference . 585–596
Qian Yang, Alex Scuito, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Aaron Steinfeld. 2018a · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Grounding interactive machine learning tool design in how non-experts actually build models. In Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference . 573–584
Qian Yang, Jina Suh, Nan-Chen Chen, and Gonzalo Ramos. 2018b · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Responsible AI by design in practice
Richard Benjamins, Alberto Barbado, and Daniel Sierra. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–16
Kenneth Holstein, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hal Daumé III, Miro Dudik, and Hanna Wallach. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca, and Effy Vayena. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Towards effective foraging by data scientists to find past analysis choices. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Mary Beth Kery, Bonnie E John, Patrick O’Flaherty, Amber Horvath, and Brad A Myers. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Collaborative Practices with Structured Data: Do Tools Support What Users Need?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14
Laura Koesten, Emilia Kacprzak, Jeni Tennison, and Elena Simperl. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Practitioners teaching data science in industry and academia: Expectations, workflows, and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–14
Sean Kross and Philip J Guo. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Enabling value sensitive AI systems through participatory design fictions
Q Vera Liao and Michael Muller. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Human-centered study of data science work practices. In Extended abstracts of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–8
Michael Muller, Melanie Feinberg, Timothy George, Steven J Jackson, Bonnie E John, Mary Beth Kery, and Samir Passi. 2019a · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Ziad Obermeyer, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Problem Formulation and Fairness. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . ACM, Atlanta GA USA, 39–48
Samir Passi and Solon Barocas. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Whither automl? understanding the role of automation in machine learning workflows. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Doris Xin, Eva Yiwei Wu, Doris Jung-Lin Lee, Niloufar Salehi, and Aditya Parameswaran. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Prescriptive and descriptive approaches to machine-learning transparency. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts . 1–9
David Adkins, Bilal Alsallakh, Adeel Cheema, Narine Kokhlikyan, Emily McReynolds, Pushkar Mishra, Chavez Procope, Jeremy Sawruk, Erin Wang, and Polina Zvyagina. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Putting AI ethics to work: are the tools fit for purpose?
Jacqui Ayling and Adriane Chapman. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
The values encoded in machine learning research. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 173–184
Abeba Birhane, Pratyusha Kalluri, Dallas Card, William Agnew, Ravit Dotan, and Michelle Bao. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Emma Strubell, Ananya Ganesh, and Andrew McCallum. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
How data scientists use computational notebooks for real-time collaboration
April Yi Wang, Anant Mittal, Christopher Brooks, and Steve Oney. 2019a · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Human-ai collaboration in data science: Exploring data scientists’ perceptions of automated ai
Dakuo Wang, Justin D Weisz, Michael Muller, Parikshit Ram, Werner Geyer, Casey Dugan, Yla Tausczik, Horst Samulowitz, and Alexander Gray. 2019b · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Explainable machine learning in deployment. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency . 648–657
Umang Bhatt, Alice Xiang, Shubham Sharma, Adrian Weller, Ankur Taly, Yunhan Jia, Joydeep Ghosh, Ruchir Puri, José MF Moura, and Peter Eckersley. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Algorithmic fairness from a non-ideal perspective. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society . 57–63
Sina Fazelpour and Zachary C Lipton. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Principled artificial intelligence: Mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI
Jessica Fjeld, Nele Achten, Hannah Hilligoss, Adam Nagy, and Madhulika Srikumar. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Experiences with improving the transparency of AI models and services. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–8
Michael Hind, Stephanie Houde, Jacquelyn Martino, Aleksandra Mojsilovic, David Piorkowski, John Richards, and Kush R Varshney. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Understanding and visualizing data iteration in machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–13
Fred Hohman, Kanit Wongsuphasawat, Mary Beth Kery, and Kayur Patel. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Ilaria Cozzaglio and Greta Favara. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Interactive model cards: A human-centered approach to model documentation. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 427–439
Anamaria Crisan, Margaret Drouhard, Jesse Vig, and Nazneen Rajani. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkits. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . ACM, Seoul Republic of Korea, 473–484
Wesley Hanwen Deng, Manish Nagireddy, Michelle Seng Ah Lee, Jatinder Singh, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Kenneth Holstein, and Haiyi Zhu. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Responsible AI Systems: Who are the Stakeholders?. In Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society . 227–236
Advait Deshpande and Helen Sharp. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Is Ideal Theory Useless for Nonideal Theory?
Eva Erman and Niklas Möller. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Non-Ideal Philosophy as Methodology
Hilkje C Hänel and Johanna M Müller. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners’ Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and Desiderata
Amy K Heger, Liz B Marquis, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Hanna Wallach, and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Operationalising AI ethics: how are companies bridging the gap between practice and principles? An exploratory study
Javier Camacho Ibáñez and Mónica Villas Olmeda. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
How different groups prioritize ethical values for responsible AI. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 310–323
Maurice Jakesch, Zana Buçinca, Saleema Amershi, and Alexandra Olteanu. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
The principles of data-centric ai (dcai)
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Ali Memariani, and Shion Guha. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Predicting Treatment Adherence of Tuberculosis Patients at Scale. In Machine Learning for Health . PMLR, 35–61
Mihir Kulkarni, Satvik Golechha, Rishi Raj, Jithin K Sreedharan, Ankit Bhardwaj, Santanu Rathod, Bhavin Vadera, Jayakrishna Kurada, Sanjay Mattoo, Rajendra Joshi, et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Four years of FAccT: A reflexive, mixed-methods analysis of research contributions, shortcomings, and future prospects. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 401–426
Benjamin Laufer, Sameer Jain, A Feder Cooper, Jon Kleinberg, and Hoda Heidari. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Holistic evaluation of language models
Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Responsible AI pattern catalogue: A multivocal literature review
Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu, Xiwei Xu, Jon Whittle, Didar Zowghi, and Aurelie Jacquet. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners’ Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Support
Michael Madaio, Lisa Egede, Hariharan Subramonyam, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach. 2022a · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners’ Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Support
Michael Madaio, Lisa Egede, Hariharan Subramonyam, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach. 2022b · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Forgetting practices in the data sciences. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–19
Michael Muller and Angelika Strohmayer. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
A Tool Bundle for AI Fairness in Practice. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts . 1–3
Boris Ruf and Marcin Detyniecki. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Organisational responses to the ethical issues of artificial intelligence
Bernd Carsten Stahl, Josephina Antoniou, Mark Ryan, Kevin Macnish, and Tilimbe Jiya. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Solving separation-of-concerns problems in collaborative design of human-AI systems through leaky abstractions. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–21
Hariharan Subramonyam, Jane Im, Colleen Seifert, and Eytan Adar. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Whose AI Dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotation.. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Ding Wang, Shantanu Prabhat, and Nithya Sambasivan. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Rethinking fairness: an interdisciplinary survey of critiques of hegemonic ML fairness approaches
Lindsay Weinberg. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
A study of UX practitioners roles in designing real-world, enterprise ML systems. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–15
Sabah Zdanowska and Alex S Taylor. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Fairness Evaluation in Text Classification: Machine Learning Practitioner Perspectives of Individual and Group Fairness. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–20
Zahra Ashktorab, Benjamin Hoover, Mayank Agarwal, Casey Dugan, Werner Geyer, Hao Bang Yang, and Mikhail Yurochkin. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Aspirations and Practice of ML Model Documentation: Moving the Needle with Nudging and Traceability. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–17
Avinash Bhat, Austin Coursey, Grace Hu, Sixian Li, Nadia Nahar, Shurui Zhou, Christian Kästner, and Jin LC Guo. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities for User-Engaged Algorithm Auditing in Industry Practice. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–18
Wesley Hanwen Deng, Boyuan Guo, Alicia Devrio, Hong Shen, Motahhare Eslami, and Kenneth Holstein. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
An ethics checklist for data scientists
Deon. 2023 (Accessed 6-Feb-2023) · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Responsible & Inclusive Cards: An Online Card Tool to Promote Critical Reflection in Technology Industry Work Practices. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–14
Salma Elsayed-Ali, Sara E Berger, Vagner Figueredo De Santana, and Juana Catalina Becerra Sandoval. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Political realism and the relationship between ideal and non-ideal theory
Greta Favara. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Towards a Human-Centred Artificial Intelligence Maturity Model. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–7
Maria Hartikainen, Kaisa Väänänen, and Thomas Olsson. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
A hunt for the Snark: Annotator Diversity in Data Practices. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–15
Shivani Kapania, Alex S Taylor, and Ding Wang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
" Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–17
Sunnie SY Kim, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Olga Russakovsky, Ruth Fong, and Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
The AI ethics maturity model: a holistic approach to advancing ethical data science in organizations
Joris Krijger, Tamara Thuis, Maarten de Ruiter, Emma Ligthart, and Indy Broekman. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Designerly understanding: Information needs for model transparency to support design ideation for AI-powered user experience. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–21
Q Vera Liao, Hariharan Subramonyam, Jennifer Wang, and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
The Unfairness of Fair Machine Learning: Levelling down and strict egalitarianism by default
Brent Mittelstadt, Sandra Wachter, and Chris Russell. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Development of a COVID-19–Related Anti-Asian Tweet Data Set: Quantitative Study
Maryam Mokhberi, Ahana Biswas, Zarif Masud, Roula Kteily-Hawa, Abby Goldstein, Joseph Roy Gillis, Shebuti Rayana, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Augmented Datasheets for Speech Datasets and Ethical Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 881–904
Orestis Papakyriakopoulos, Anna Seo Gyeong Choi, William Thong, Dora Zhao, Jerone Andrews, Rebecca Bourke, Alice Xiang, and Allison Koenecke. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Stronger Together: on the Articulation of Ethical Charters, Legal Tools, and Technical Documentation in ML. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 343–354
Giada Pistilli, Carlos Muñoz Ferrandis, Yacine Jernite, and Margaret Mitchell. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
From plane crashes to algorithmic harm: applicability of safety engineering frameworks for responsible ML. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–18
Shalaleh Rismani, Renee Shelby, Andrew Smart, Edgar Jatho, Joshua Kroll, AJung Moon, and Negar Rostamzadeh. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Angler: Helping Machine Translation Practitioners Prioritize Model Improvements. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–20
Samantha Robertson, Zijie J Wang, Dominik Moritz, Mary Beth Kery, and Fred Hohman. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Enough With “Human-AI Collaboration”. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–8
Advait Sarkar. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Rethinking "Risk" in Algorithmic Systems Through A Computational Narrative Analysis of Casenotes in Child-Welfare
Devansh Saxena, Erina Seh-Young Moon, Aryan Chaurasia, Yixin Guan, and Shion Guha. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
“It is currently hodgepodge”: Examining AI/ML Practitioners’ Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Values. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–17
Rama Adithya Varanasi and Nitesh Goyal. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI Challenges. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Qiaosi Wang, Michael Madaio, Shaun Kane, Shivani Kapania, Michael Terry, and Lauren Wilcox. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Seeing like a toolkit: How toolkits envision the work of AI ethics
Richmond Y Wong, Michael A Madaio, and Nick Merrill. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Harnessing biomedical literature to calibrate clinicians’ trust in AI decision support systems. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–14
Qian Yang, Yuexing Hao, Kexin Quan, Stephen Yang, Yiran Zhao, Volodymyr Kuleshov, and Fei Wang. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Investigating How Practitioners Use Human-AI Guidelines: A Case Study on the People+ AI Guidebook. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Nur Yildirim, Mahima Pushkarna, Nitesh Goyal, Martin Wattenberg, and Fernanda Viégas. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.
Contextualizing User Perceptions about Biases for Human-Centered Explainable Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–15
Chien Wen Yuan, Nanyi Bi, Ya-Fang Lin, and Yuen-Hsien Tseng. 2023 · 2023
Later among the works it cites.