Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Responsible AI is widely considered as one of the greatest scientific challenges of our time and is key to increase the adoption of AI.
K. Beck and W. Cunningham, “Using pattern languages for object oriented programs,” in Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA) , 1987
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. B. Chrissis, and C. V. Weber, “Capability maturity model, version 1.1,” IEEE software , vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 18–27, 1993
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. C. Martin, D. Riehle, and F. Buschmann, Pattern languages of program design 3 . Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1997
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Redmill, “Risk analysisa subjective process,” Engineering Management Journal , vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 91–96, 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Mitchell, P. Henderson, C. D. Manning, D. Jurafsky, and C. Finn, “Self-destructing models: Increasing the costs of harmful dual uses in foundation models,” in First Workshop on Pre-training: Perspectives, Pitfalls, and Paths Forward at ICML 2022 , 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. C. Knight, “N-version programming,” Encyclopedia of Software Engineering , 2002
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. A. Kitchenham and S. Charters, “Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering,” Tech. Rep., 2007
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Murphy, G. E. Kaiser, and M. Arias, “An approach to software testing of machine learning applications,” 2007
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Shafto, M. Conroy, R. Doyle, E. Glaessgen, C. Kemp, J. LeMoigne, and L. Wang, “Modeling, simulation, information technology & processing roadmap,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration , vol. 32, no. 2012, pp. 1–38, 2012
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. D. Luxton, “Recommendations for the ethical use and design of artificial intelligent care providers,” Artificial intelligence in medicine , vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Society, P. Bourque, and R. Fairley, “Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge (swebok (r)),” 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. J. Goodall, “Machine ethics and automated vehicles,” in Road vehicle automation . Springer, 2014, pp. 93–102
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Staples, L. Zhu, and J. Grundy, “Continuous validation for data analytics systems,” in Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion , 2016, pp. 769–772
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. D. Martin and T. T. Makoundou, “Taking the high road ethics by design in ai,” ACM Inroads , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 35–37, 2017
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Dosovitskiy, G. Ros, F. Codevilla, A. Lopez, and V. Koltun, “Carla: An open urban driving simulator,” in Conference on robot learning . PMLR, 2017, pp. 1–16
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Hirsch, K. Merced, S. Narayanan, Z. E. Imel, and D. C. Atkins, “Designing contestability: Interaction design, machine learning, and mental health,” in Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems , 2017, pp. 95–99
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Bonawitz, V. Ivanov, B. Kreuter, A. Marcedone, H. B. McMahan, S. Patel, D. Ramage, A. Segal, and K. Seth, “Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning,” in proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , 2017, pp. 1175–1191
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. F. Winfield and M. Jirotka, “The case for an ethical black box,” in Annual Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems . Springer, 2017, pp. 262–273
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. N. Hooker and T. W. N. Kim, “Toward non-intuition-based machine and artificial intelligence ethics: A deontological approach based on modal logic,” in Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , 2018, pp. 130–136
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. d’Aquin, P. Troullinou, N. E. O’Connor, A. Cullen, G. Faller, and L. Holden, “Towards an” ethics by design” methodology for ai research projects,” in Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , 2018, pp. 54–59
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Kasenberg, T. Arnold, and M. Scheutz, “Norms, rewards, and the intentional stance: Comparing machine learning approaches to ethical training,” in Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , 2018, pp. 184–190
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Anderson and S. L. Anderson, “Geneth: A general ethical dilemma analyzer,” Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 337–357, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. J. Pandit, D. O’Sullivan, and D. Lewis, “Towards knowledge-based systems for gdpr compliance.” in CKGSemStats@ ISWC , 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, “The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines,” Nature Machine Intelligence , vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 389–399, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Garousi, M. Felderer, and M. V. Mäntylä, “Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering,” Information and Software Technology , vol. 106, pp. 101–121, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584918301939
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. Dignum, “Ensuring responsible ai in practice,” in Responsible Artificial Intelligence . Springer, 2019, pp. 93–105
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Alsheiabni, Y. Cheung, and C. Messom, “Towards an artificial intelligence maturity model: from science fiction to business facts,” 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Barclay, A. Preece, I. Taylor, and D. Verma, “Towards traceability in data ecosystems using a bill of materials model,” in International Workshop on Science Gateways . CEUR-WS, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Amershi, A. Begel, C. Bird, R. DeLine, H. Gall, E. Kamar, N. Nagappan, B. Nushi, and T. Zimmermann, “Software engineering for machine learning: A case study,” in 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 291–300
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Mitchell, S. Wu, A. Zaldivar, P. Barnes, L. Vasserman, B. Hutchinson, E. Spitzer, I. D. Raji, and T. Gebru, “Model cards for model reporting,” in Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , 2019, pp. 220–229
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Arnold, R. K. Bellamy, M. Hind, S. Houde, S. Mehta, A. Mojsilović, R. Nair, K. N. Ramamurthy, A. Olteanu, D. Piorkowski et al. , “Factsheets: Increasing trust in ai services through supplier’s declarations of conformity,” IBM Journal of Research and Development , vol. 63, no. 4/5, pp. 6–1, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Ebert and M. Weyrich, “Validation of autonomous systems,” IEEE Software , vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 15–23, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vogelsang and M. Borg, “Requirements engineering for machine learning: Perspectives from data scientists,” in 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 245–251
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Horkoff, “Non-functional requirements for machine learning: Challenges and new directions,” in 2019 IEEE 27th international requirements engineering conference (RE) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 386–391
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Takeda, Y. Hirata, Y.-H. Weng, T. Katayama, Y. Mizuta, and A. Koujina, “Accountable system design architecture for embodied ai: a focus on physical human support robots,” Advanced Robotics , vol. 33, no. 23, pp. 1248–1263, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. F. Jentzsch, S. Höhn, and N. Hochgeschwender, “Conversational interfaces for explainable ai: a human-centred approach,” in International Workshop on Explainable, Transparent Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems . Springer, 2019, pp. 77–92
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Aggarwal, P. Lohia, S. Nagar, K. Dey, and D. Saha, “Black box fairness testing of machine learning models,” in Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , 2019, pp. 625–635
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. W. W. Consortium et al. , “Verifiable credentials data model 1.0: Expressing verifiable information on the web,” https://www. w3. org/TR/vc-data-model/?# core-data-model , 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Weng, J. Weng, J. Zhang, M. Li, Y. Zhang, and W. Luo, “Deepchain: Auditable and privacy-preserving deep learning with blockchain-based incentive,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing , vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 2438–2455, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Fjeld et. al., “Principled artificial intelligence: Mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for ai,” Berkman Klein Center Research Publication , no. 2020-1, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. V. Liao, D. Gruen, and S. Miller, “Questioning the ai: Informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences,” in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , ser. CHI ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 1–15. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376590
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. D. Raji, A. Smart, R. N. White, M. Mitchell, T. Gebru, B. Hutchinson, J. Smith-Loud, D. Theron, and P. Barnes, “Closing the ai accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing,” in Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , 2020, pp. 33–44
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Shneiderman, “Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: Guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered ai systems,” ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. , vol. 10, no. 4, 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
R. H. Yap, “Towards certifying trustworthy machine learning systems,” in International Workshop on the Foundations of Trustworthy AI Integrating Learning, Optimization and Reasoning . Springer, 2020, pp. 77–82
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
M. D. McCradden, S. Joshi, J. A. Anderson, M. Mazwi, A. Goldenberg, and R. Zlotnik Shaul, “Patient safety and quality improvement: Ethical principles for a regulatory approach to bias in healthcare machine learning,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2024–2027, 2020
B. Fish and L. Stark, “Reflexive design for fairness and other human values in formal models,” in Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , 2021, pp. 89–99
2021
Later among the works it cites.
I. Naja, M. Markovic, P. Edwards, and C. Cottrill, “A semantic framework to support ai system accountability and audit,” in European Semantic Web Conference . Springer, 2021, pp. 160–176
2021
Later among the works it cites.
V. Singh, S. K. S. Hari, T. Tsai, and M. Pitale, “Simulation driven design and test for safety of ai based autonomous vehicles,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2021, pp. 122–128
2021
Later among the works it cites.
N. Six, A. Perrichon-Chrétien, and N. Herbaut, “Saiaas: A blockchain-based solution for secure artificial intelligence as-a-service,” in The International Conference on Deep Learning, Big Data and Blockchain . Springer, 2021, pp. 67–74
2021
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
K.-E. K. Bilstrup, M. H. Kaspersen, and M. G. Petersen, “Staging reflections on ethical dilemmas in machine learning: A card-based design workshop for high school students,” in Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference , 2020, pp. 1211–1222
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Wadhwani and P. Jain, “Machine learning model cards transparency review: Using model card toolkit,” in 2020 IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 133–137
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
L. Gauerhof, R. Hawkins, C. Picardi, C. Paterson, Y. Hagiwara, and I. Habli, “Assuring the safety of machine learning for pedestrian detection at crossings,” in International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security . Springer, 2020, pp. 197–212
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Sekiguchi and K. Hori, “Organic and dynamic tool for use with knowledge base of ai ethics for promoting engineers’ practice of ethical ai design,” AI & SOCIETY , vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 51–71, 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Hussain, R. Hussain, B. Noye, and S. Sharieh, “Enterprise api security and gdpr compliance: Design and implementation perspective,” IT Professional , vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 81–89, 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Fan, L. Yu, S. Chen, H. Zhou, X. Luo, S. Li, Y. Liu, J. Liu, and T. Liu, “An empirical evaluation of gdpr compliance violations in android mhealth apps,” in 2020 IEEE 31st international symposium on software reliability engineering (ISSRE) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 253–264
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Xie and P. Wu, “Fairness testing of machine learning models using deep reinforcement learning,” in 2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 121–128
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
M. M. John, H. Holmström Olsson, and J. Bosch, “Architecting ai deployment: A systematic review of state-of-the-art and state-of-practice literature,” in International Conference on Software Business . Springer, 2020, pp. 14–29
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Chattopadhyay, A. Ali, and D. Thaxton, “Assessing the alignment of social robots with trustworthy ai design guidelines: A preliminary research study,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy , 2021, pp. 325–327
2021
Later among the works it cites.
N. Mehrabi, F. Morstatter, N. Saxena, K. Lerman, and A. Galstyan, “A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1–35, 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. Martínez-Fernández, X. Franch, A. Jedlitschka, M. Oriol, and A. Trendowicz, “Developing and operating artificial intelligence models in trustworthy autonomous systems,” in International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science . Springer, 2021, pp. 221–229
2021
Later among the works it cites.
R. V. Zicari, J. Brodersen, J. Brusseau, B. Düdder, T. Eichhorn, T. Ivanov, G. Kararigas, P. Kringen, M. McCullough, F. Möslein et al. , “Z-inspection®: a process to assess trustworthy ai,” IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83–97, 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
J. Henderson, S. Sharma, A. Gee, V. Alexiev, S. Draper, C. Marin, Y. Hinojosa, C. Draper, M. Perng, L. Aguirre et al. , “Certifai: a toolkit for building trust in ai systems,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence , 2021, pp. 5249–5251
2021
Later among the works it cites.
W. Verachtert, T. J. Ashby, I. Chakroun, R. Wuyts, S. Das, S. Halder, and P. Leray, “Privacy preserving amalgamated machine learning for process control,” in Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Semiconductor Manufacturing XXXV , vol. 11611. SPIE, 2021, pp. 329–341
2021
Later among the works it cites.
N. Sugianto, D. Tjondronegoro, R. Stockdale, and E. I. Yuwono, “Privacy-preserving ai-enabled video surveillance for social distancing: Responsible design and deployment for public spaces,” Information Technology & People , 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S. Warnat-Herresthal, H. Schultze, K. L. Shastry, S. Manamohan, S. Mukherjee, V. Garg, R. Sarveswara, K. Händler, P. Pickkers, N. A. Aziz et al. , “Swarm learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning,” Nature , vol. 594, no. 7862, pp. 265–270, 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. Lavaei, B. Zhong, M. Caccamo, and M. Zamani, “Towards trustworthy ai: safe-visor architecture for uncertified controllers in stochastic cyber-physical systems,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Computation-Aware Algorithmic Design for Cyber-Physical Systems , 2021, pp. 7–8
2021
Later among the works it cites.
I. Esnaola-Gonzalez, “An ontology-based approach for making machine learning systems accountable,” 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
G. Falco, B. Shneiderman, J. Badger, R. Carrier, A. Dahbura, D. Danks, M. Eling, A. Goodloe, J. Gupta, C. Hart et al. , “Governing ai safety through independent audits,” Nature Machine Intelligence , vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 566–571, 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
B. S. Miguel, A. Naseer, and H. Inakoshi, “Putting accountability of ai systems into practice,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence , 2021, pp. 5276–5278
2021
Later among the works it cites.
OECD, “Tools for trustworthy ai,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/008232ec-en
2021
Later among the works it cites.
S.-H. Han and H.-J. Choi, “Checklist for validating trustworthy ai,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 391–394
2022
Closest in time.
Z. Zhou, Z. Li, Y. Zhang, and L. Sun, “Transparent-ai blueprint: Developing a conceptual tool to support the design of transparent ai agents,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction , pp. 1–28, 2022
2022
Closest in time.
D. Adkins, B. Alsallakh, A. Cheema, N. Kokhlikyan, E. McReynolds, P. Mishra, C. Procope, J. Sawruk, E. Wang, and P. Zvyagina, “Prescriptive and descriptive approaches to machine-learning transparency,” in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts , 2022, pp. 1–9
2022
Closest in time.
DISER (Australian Government), “Australia’s AI Ethics Principles,” https://industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-framework/australias-ai-ethics-principles , 2020, accessed: 17 Aug 2022
2022
Closest in time.
L. Zhu, X. Xu, Q. Lu, G. Governatori, and J. Whittle, “Ai and ethics—operationalizing responsible ai,” in Humanity Driven AI . Springer, 2022, pp. 15–33
2022
Closest in time.
M. Sloane and J. Zakrzewski, “German ai start-ups and “ai ethics”: Using a social practice lens for assessing and implementing socio-technical innovation,” in 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2022, pp. 935–947
2022
Closest in time.
M. D. Schultz and P. Seele, “Towards ai ethics’ institutionalization: knowledge bridges from business ethics to advance organizational ai ethics,” AI and Ethics , pp. 1–13, 2022
2022
Closest in time.
NTIA, “The Minimum Elements For a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM),” https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/sbom_minimum_elements_report.pdf , 2021, accessed 18 Aug 2022
2022
Closest in time.
M. Sand, J. M. Durán, and K. R. Jongsma, “Responsibility beyond design: Physicians’ requirements for ethical medical ai,” Bioethics , vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 162–169, 2022
2022
Closest in time.
W. Hussain, M. Shahin, R. Hoda, J. Whittle, H. Perera, A. Nurwidyantoro, R. A. Shams, and G. Oliver, “How can human values be addressed in agilemethods a case study on safe,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , 2022
2022
Closest in time.
Q. Lu, L. Zhu, X. Xu, J. Whittle, and Z. Xing, “Towards a roadmap on software engineering for responsible ai,” in 2022 IEEE/ACM 1st International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) , 2022, pp. 101–112
2022
Closest in time.
D. Adkins, B. Alsallakh, A. Cheema, N. Kokhlikyan, E. McReynolds, P. Mishra, C. Procope, J. Sawruk, E. Wang, and P. Zvyagina, “Method cards for prescriptive machine-learning transparency,” in 2022 IEEE/ACM 1st International Conference on AI Engineering–Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 90–100
2022
Closest in time.
G. PAIR, “People + ai guidebook,” pair.withgoogle.com/guidebook , 2021, accessed: 17 Aug 2022
2022
Closest in time.
S. Umbrello, “The role of engineers in harmonising human values for ai systems design,” Journal of Responsible Technology , vol. 10, p. 100031, 2022
2022
Closest in time.
P. Ayranci, P. Lai, N. Phan, H. Hu, A. Kolinowski, D. Newman, and D. Dou, “Onml: an ontology-based approach for interpretable machine learning,” Journal of Combinatorial Optimization , pp. 1–24, 2022
2022
Closest in time.
C. Regli and B. Annighoefer, “An anthropomorphic approach to establish an additional layer of trustworthiness of an ai pilot,” in Software Engineering 2022 Workshops . Gesellschaft für Informatik eV, 2022
2022
Closest in time.
2022
Closest in time.
R. B. L. Dixon, “A principled governance for emerging ai regimes: lessons from china, the european union, and the united states,” AI and Ethics , pp. 1–18, 2022
2022
Closest in time.
S. K. Lo, Q. Lu, L. Zhu, H.-y. Paik, X. Xu, and C. Wang, “Architectural patterns for the design of federated learning systems,” Journal of Systems and Software , vol. 191, p. 111357, 2022
2022
Closest in time.
T. U. S. D. of Commerce, “The minimum elements for a software bill of materials (sbom),” https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/sbom_minimum_elements_report.pdf , 2021, accessed 17 Aug 2022
2022
Closest in time.
I. Barclay, A. Preece, I. Taylor, S. K. Radha, and J. Nabrzyski, “Providing assurance and scrutability on shared data and machine learning models with verifiable credentials,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience , p. e6997, 2022
2022
Closest in time.
W. Chu, “A decentralized approach towards responsible ai in social ecosystems,” in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media , vol. 16, 2022, pp. 79–89
2022
Closest in time.
Microsoft, “Microsoft hax toolkit,” https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/haxtoolkit/ , 2022, accessed: 17 Aug 2022
2022
Closest in time.
M. Anagnostou, O. Karvounidou, C. Katritzidaki, C. Kechagia, K. Melidou, E. Mpeza, I. Konstantinidis, E. Kapantai, C. Berberidis, I. Magnisalis et al. , “Characteristics and challenges in the industries towards responsible ai: a systematic literature review,” Ethics and Information Technology , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 2022
2022
Closest in time.