Using Large Language Models for Commit Message Generation: A Preliminary Study

G. D. Israel, “Determining sample size,” Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Florida, U.S.A, Fact Sheet PEOD-6, November 1992

1992

Earlier work this paper cites.

K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.-J. Zhu, “Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) . ACL, 2002, pp. 311–318

2002

Earlier work this paper cites.

C.-Y. Lin, “Rouge: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out (WAS) . ACL, 2004, pp. 74–81

2004

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Linares-Vásquez, L. F. Cortés-Coy, J. Aponte, and D. Poshyvanyk, “Changescribe: A tool for automatically generating commit messages,” in Proceedings of 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . ACM, 2015, pp. 709–712

2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

S. Jiang, A. Armaly, and C. McMillan, “Automatically generating commit messages from diffs using neural machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 135–146

2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

P. Loyola, E. Marrese-Taylor, and Y. Matsuo, “A neural architecture for generating natural language descriptions from source code changes,” in Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) . ACL, 2017, pp. 287–292

2017

Cited alongside, same era.

S. Jiang and C. McMillan, “Towards automatic generation of short summaries of commits,” in Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 320–323

2017

Cited alongside, same era.

Z. Liu, X. Xia, A. E. Hassan, D. Lo, Z. Xing, and X. Wang, “Neural-machine-translation-based commit message generation: How far are we?” in Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) . ACM, 2018, pp. 373–384

2018

Cited alongside, same era.

S. Xu, Y. Yao, F. Xu, T. Gu, H. Tong, and J. Lu, “Commit message generation for source code changes,” in Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) . IJCAI, 2019, pp. 3975–3981

A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, and I. Sutskever, “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” OpenAI Blog , vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 1–24, 2019

2019

Later among the works it cites.

W. Tao, Y. Wang, E. Shi, L. Du, S. Han, H. Zhang, D. Zhang, and W. Zhang, “On the evaluation of commit message generation models: An experimental study,” in Proceedings of the 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 126–136

2021

Later among the works it cites.

J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, b. ichter, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. V. Le, and D. Zhou, “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , 2022, pp. 24 824–24 837

Original

2022

Later among the works it cites.

X. Hou, Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, Z. Yang, K. Wang, L. Li, X. Luo, D. Lo, J. Grundy, and H. Wang, “Large language models for software engineering: A systematic literature review,” arXiv:2308.10620 , 2023

Original