RepairLLaMA: Efficient Representations and Fine-Tuned Adapters for Program Repair

R. Just, D. Jalali, and M. D. Ernst, “Defects4j: A database of existing faults to enable controlled testing studies for java programs,” in Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis . ACM, 2014, pp. 437–440

2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

J.-R. Falleri, F. Morandat, X. Blanc, M. Martinez, and M. Monperrus, “Fine-grained and accurate source code differencing,” in Proceedings of the 29th ACM/IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering , 2014, pp. 313–324

2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

R. Pawlak, M. Monperrus, N. Petitprez, C. Noguera, and L. Seinturier, “Spoon: A library for implementing analyses and transformations of java source code,” Softw. Pract. Exper. , vol. 46, no. 9, p. 1155–1179, Sep. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2346

2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

R. Gupta, S. Pal, A. Kanade, and S. Shevade, “Deepfix: Fixing common c language errors by deep learning,” in Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , ser. AAAI’17. AAAI Press, 2017, p. 1345–1351

2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Monperrus, “Automatic software repair: A bibliography,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2018

2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Z. Chen, S. Kommrusch, M. Tufano, L.-N. Pouchet, D. Poshyvanyk, and M. Monperrus, “Sequencer: Sequence-to-sequence learning for end-to-end program repair,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1943–1959, 2019

2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

S. Saha, R. K. Saha, and M. R. Prasad, “Harnessing evolution for multi-hunk program repair,” in Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’19, 2019, p. 13–24

2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Z. Chen, S. J. Kommrusch, M. Tufano, L. Pouchet, D. Poshyvanyk, and M. Monperrus, “Sequencer: Sequence-to-sequence learning for end-to-end program repair,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , 2019

2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Yasunaga and P. Liang, “Graph-based, self-supervised program repair from diagnostic feedback,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2020, pp. 10 799–10 808

2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. Le Goues, M. Pradel, A. Roychoudhury, and S. Chandra, “Automatic program repair,” IEEE Software , vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 22–27, 2021

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

Q. Zhu, Z. Sun, Y.-a. Xiao, W. Zhang, K. Yuan, Y. Xiong, and L. Zhang, “A syntax-guided edit decoder for neural program repair,” in Proceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. ESEC/FSE 2021. ACM, 2021, p. 341–353

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

N. Jiang, T. Lutellier, and L. Tan, “Cure: Code-aware neural machine translation for automatic program repair,” in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering , 2021

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

Z. Chen, V. J. Hellendoorn, P. Lamblin, P. Maniatis, P.-A. Manzagol, D. Tarlow, and S. Moitra, “Plur: A unifying, graph-based view of program learning, understanding, and repair,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 34, pp. 23 089–23 101, 2021

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

E. J. Hu, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y. Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, W. Chen et al. , “Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Monperrus, M. Martinez, H. Ye, F. Madeiral, T. Durieux, and Z. Yu, “Megadiff: A dataset of 600k java source code changes categorized by diff size,” 2021

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

N. Jiang, T. Lutellier, and L. Tan, “Cure: Code-aware neural machine translation for automatic program repair,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1161–1173

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Chen, J. Tworek, H. Jun, Q. Yuan, H. P. d. O. Pinto, J. Kaplan, H. Edwards, Y. Burda, N. Joseph, G. Brockman et al. , “Evaluating large language models trained on code,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374 , 2021

Original

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

K. Abhinav, V. Sharvani, A. Dubey, M. D’Souza, N. Bhardwaj, S. Jain, and V. Arora, “Repairnet: contextual sequence-to-sequence network for automated program repair,” in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education . Springer, 2021, pp. 3–15

2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

H. Ye, M. Martinez, X. Luo, T. Zhang, and M. Monperrus, “Selfapr: Self-supervised program repair with test execution diagnostics,” in Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 1–13

2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. S. Xia and L. Zhang, “Less training, more repairing please: revisiting automated program repair via zero-shot learning,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 959–971

2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

C. S. Xia, Y. Wei, and L. Zhang, “Practical program repair in the era of large pre-trained language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14179 , 2022

Original

2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

W. Yuan, Q. Zhang, T. He, C. Fang, N. Q. V. Hung, X. Hao, and H. Yin, “Circle: Continual repair across programming languages,” in Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis , 2022, pp. 678–690

2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Bavarian, H. Jun, N. Tezak, J. Schulman, C. McLeavey, J. Tworek, and M. Chen, “Efficient training of language models to fill in the middle,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.14255 , 2022

Original

2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. Namavar, N. Nashid, and A. Mesbah, “A controlled experiment of different code representations for learning-based program repair,” Empirical Software Engineering , vol. 27, no. 7, p. 190, 2022

2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

D. Fried, A. Aghajanyan, J. Lin, S. Wang, E. Wallace, F. Shi, R. Zhong, W.-t. Yih, L. Zettlemoyer, and M. Lewis, “Incoder: A generative model for code infilling and synthesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05999 , 2022

Original

2022

Cited alongside, same era.

J. Zhang, S. Panthaplackel, P. Nie, J. J. Li, and M. Gligoric, “Coditt5: Pretraining for source code and natural language editing,” in Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 1–12

2022

Cited alongside, same era.

Z. Chen, S. Kommrusch, and M. Monperrus, “Neural transfer learning for repairing security vulnerabilities in c code,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 147–165, 2022

2022

Cited alongside, same era.

C. Wang, Y. Yang, C. Gao, Y. Peng, H. Zhang, and M. R. Lyu, “No more fine-tuning? an experimental evaluation of prompt tuning in code intelligence,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 382–394

T. Ahmed and P. Devanbu, “Majority rule: better patching via self-consistency,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00108 , 2023

Original

2023

Closest in time.

Q. Huang, J. Zhu, Z. Xing, H. Jin, C. Wang, and X. Xu, “A chain of ai-based solutions for resolving fqns and fixing syntax errors in partial code,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11981 , 2023

Original

2023

Closest in time.

P. Deligiannis, A. Lal, N. Mehrotra, and A. Rastogi, “Fixing rust compilation errors using llms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05177 , 2023

Original

2023

Closest in time.

N. Muennighoff, Q. Liu, A. Zebaze, Q. Zheng, B. Hui, T. Y. Zhuo, S. Singh, X. Tang, L. von Werra, and S. Longpre, “Octopack: Instruction tuning code large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07124 , 2023

Original

2023

Closest in time.