Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large Language models (LLMs) can be induced to solve non-trivial problems with "few-shot" prompts including illustrative problem-solution examples.
Q. McNemar, “Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages,” Psychometrika , vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 153–157, 1947
1947
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Robertson, H. Zaragoza et al. , “The probabilistic relevance framework: Bm25 and beyond,” Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval , vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 333–389, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Just, D. Jalali, and M. D. Ernst, “Defects4j: A database of existing faults to enable controlled testing studies for java programs,” in Proceedings of the 2014 international symposium on software testing and analysis , 2014, pp. 437–440
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Lin, J. Koppel, A. Chen, and A. Solar-Lezama, “Quixbugs: A multi-lingual program repair benchmark set based on the quixey challenge,” in Proceedings Companion of the 2017 ACM SIGPLAN international conference on systems, programming, languages, and applications: software for humanity , 2017, pp. 55–56
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Tufano, C. Watson, G. Bavota, M. D. Penta, M. White, and D. Poshyvanyk, “An empirical study on learning bug-fixing patches in the wild via neural machine translation,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) , vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1–29, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Chen, S. Kommrusch, M. Tufano, L.-N. Pouchet, D. Poshyvanyk, and M. Monperrus, “Sequencer: Sequence-to-sequence learning for end-to-end program repair,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1943–1959, 2019
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell et al. , “Language models are few-shot learners,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Lutellier, H. V. Pham, L. Pang, Y. Li, M. Wei, and L. Tan, “Coconut: combining context-aware neural translation models using ensemble for program repair,” in Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on software testing and analysis , 2020, pp. 101–114
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Chakraborty and B. Ray, “On multi-modal learning of editing source code,” in 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 443–455
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Wang, W. Wang, S. Joty, and S. C. Hoi, “Codet5: Identifier-aware unified pre-trained encoder-decoder models for code understanding and generation,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 2021, pp. 8696–8708
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Berabi, J. He, V. Raychev, and M. Vechev, “Tfix: Learning to fix coding errors with a text-to-text transformer,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2021, pp. 780–791
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Jiang, T. Lutellier, and L. Tan, “Cure: Code-aware neural machine translation for automatic program repair,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1161–1173
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Ye, M. Martinez, and M. Monperrus, “Neural program repair with execution-based backpropagation,” in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 1506–1518
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
F. F. Xu, U. Alon, G. Neubig, and V. J. Hellendoorn, “A systematic evaluation of large language models of code,” in Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Machine Programming , 2022, pp. 1–10
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Ahmed and P. Devanbu, “Few-shot training llms for project-specific code-summarization,” in 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 1–5
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Chakraborty, T. Ahmed, Y. Ding, P. T. Devanbu, and B. Ray, “Natgen: generative pre-training by “naturalizing” source code,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering , 2022, pp. 18–30
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Lu, D. Guo, S. Ren, J. Huang, A. Svyatkovskiy, A. Blanco, C. Clement, D. Drain, D. Jiang, D. Tang et al. , “Codexglue: A machine learning benchmark dataset for code understanding and generation,” in Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 1)
Cited in the paper.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
N. Nashid, M. Sintaha, and A. Mesbah, “Retrieval-based prompt selection for code-related few-shot learning,” in Proceedings of the 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’23) , 2023
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.