Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
A critical factor in the success of decision support systems is the accurate modeling of user preferences.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al · 1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Revealed preference theory
Marcel K Richter. 1966 · 1966
Earlier work this paper cites.
Anticipated choice, attention, and halo effect
Judson Mills and Edgar O’Neal. 1971 · 1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment
Irving L Janis and Leon Mann. 1977 · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
Multiattribute evaluation
Ward Edwards and J. Robert Newman. 1982 · 1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
A personal learning apprentice. In Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence . 96–103
Lisa Dent, Jesus Boticario, John McDermott, Tom Mitchell, and David Zabowski. 1992 · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective
John W Payne, James R Bettman, and Eric J Johnson. 1992 · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach
Robin Gregory, Sarah Lichtenstein, and Paul Slovic. 1993 · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs
Ralph L Keeney and Howard Raiffa. 1993 · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
The adaptive decision maker
John W Payne, James R Bettman, and Eric J Johnson. 1993 · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Experience with a learning personal assistant
Tom M Mitchell, Rich Caruana, Dayne Freitag, John McDermott, David Zabowski, et al · 1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
The construction of preference
Paul Slovic. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
The distortion of information during decisions
J Edward Russo, Victoria Husted Medvec, and Margaret G Meloy. 1996 · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introduction to linear optimization . Vol. 6
Dimitris Bertsimas and John N Tsitsiklis. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
An automated meeting scheduling system that utilizes user preferences. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents . ACM, New York, NY, 308–315
Thomas Haynes, Sandip Sen, Neeraj Arora, and Rajani Nadella. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Satisfying user preferences while negotiating meetings
Sandip Sen, Thomas Haynes, and Neeraj Arora. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Constructive consumer choice processes
James R Bettman, Mary Frances Luce, and John W Payne. 1998 · 1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
Design: Cultural probes
Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Constraint (logic) programming: A survey on research and applications. In Compulog Net/ERCIM Workshop on Constraints . Springer, Springer, New York, NY, 40–74
Francesca Rossi. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Making rational decisions using adaptive utility elicitation. In AAAI Proceedings . AAAI, New York, NY, 363–369
Urszula Chajewska, Daphne Koller, and Ronald Parr. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code
John W Payne, James R Bettman, David A Schkade, Norbert Schwarz, and Robin Gregory. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Constructed preferences and value-focused thinking: Implications for AI research on preference elicitation. In AAAI Workshop on Preferences in AI and CP: Symbolic Approaches . 1–10
Giuseppe Carenini and David Poole. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Augmenting shared personal calendars. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology . ACM, New York, NY, 11–20
Joe Tullio, Jeremy Goecks, Elizabeth D Mynatt, and David H Nguyen. 2002 · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A framework for the development of personalized, distributed web-based configuration systems
Liliana Ardissono, Alexander Felfernig, Gerhard Friedrich, Anna Goy, Dietmar Jannach, Giovanna Petrone, Ralph Schafer, and Markus Zanker. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Towards more conversational and collaborative recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 12–18
Giuseppe Carenini, Jocelyin Smith, and David Poole. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 17–24
Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, et al · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
User-involved preference elicitation
Pearl Pu, Boi Faltings, and Marc Torrens. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Survey of preference elicitation methods
Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dynamic valuation: Preference changes in the context of face-to-face negotiation
Jared R Curhan, Margaret A Neale, and Lee Ross. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Prospects for preferences
Jon Doyle. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance
John D Lee and Katrina A See. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Active preference learning for personalized calendar scheduling assistance. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 90–97
Melinda T Gervasio, Michael D Moffitt, Martha E Pollack, Joseph M Taylor, and Tomas E Uribe. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Making better decisions: From measuring to constructing preferences
Eric J Johnson, Mary Steffel, and Daniel G Goldstein. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Calendar assistants that learn preferences. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Persistent Assistants: Living and Working with AI . 7–13
Jean Oh and Stephen F Smith. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
User acceptance of multi-criteria decision support systems: The impact of preference elicitation techniques
John A Aloysius, Fred D Davis, Darryl D Wilson, A Ross Taylor, and Jeffrey E Kottemann. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
groupTime: Preference based group scheduling. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1047–1056
Mike Brzozowski, Kendra Carattini, Scott R Klemmer, Patrick Mihelich, Jiang Hu, and Andrew Y Ng. 2006 · 2006
Cited alongside, same era.
Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis
Kathy Charmaz. 2006 · 2006
Cited alongside, same era.
The construction of preference
Sarah Lichtenstein and Paul Slovic. 2006 · 2006
Cited alongside, same era.
Evaluating preference-based search tools: A tale of two approaches. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06) . AAAI Press, 205–211
Paolo Viappiani, Boi Faltings, and Pearl Pu. 2006 · 2006
Cited alongside, same era.
Balancing the needs of personalization and reasoning in a user-centric scheduling assistant
Pauline Berry, Melinda Gervasio, Bart Peintner, and Neil Yorke-Smith. 2007 · 2007
Cited alongside, same era.
Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferences
Michiel Bakker, Martin Chadwick, Hannah Sheahan, Michael Tessler, Lucy Campbell-Gillingham, Jan Balaguer, Nat McAleese, Amelia Glaese, John Aslanides, Matt Botvinick, et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
What does it mean for a language model to preserve privacy?. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 2280–2292
Hannah Brown, Katherine Lee, Fatemehsadat Mireshghallah, Reza Shokri, and Florian Tramèr. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis
Sarah Lebovitz, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, and Natalia Levina. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Augmenting operations research with auto-formulation of optimization models from problem descriptions. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track . 29–62
Rindra Ramamonjison, Haley Li, Timothy Yu, Shiqi He, Vishnu Rengan, Amin Banitalebi-Dehkordi, Zirui Zhou, and Yong Zhang. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
How HCI interprets the probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1077–1086
Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, and Paul Dourish. 2007 · 2007
Cited alongside, same era.
Decision making and action: The search for a good structure
Henry Montgomery and Helena Willén. 2007 · 2007
Cited alongside, same era.
Preference handling for artificial intelligence
Judy Goldsmith and Ulrich Junker. 2008 · 2008
Cited alongside, same era.
Probes and participation. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008 . ACM, New York, NY, 194–197
Connor Graham and Mark Rouncefield. 2008 · 2008
Cited alongside, same era.
Preferences in interactive systems: Technical challenges and case studies
Bart Peintner, Paolo Viappiani, and Neil Yorke-Smith. 2008 · 2008
Cited alongside, same era.
The transience of constructed preferences
Dan Simon, Daniel C Krawczyk, Airom Bleicher, and Keith J Holyoak. 2008 · 2008
Cited alongside, same era.
Diversifying search results. In Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining . 5–14
Rakesh Agrawal, Sreenivas Gollapudi, Alan Halverson, and Samuel Ieong. 2009 · 2009
Cited alongside, same era.
Incomplete distributed constraint optimization problems: Model, algorithms, and heuristics. In Distributed Artificial Intelligence . Springer, New York, NY, 64–78
Atena M Tabakhi, William Yeoh, and Roie Zivan. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
LaMDA: Language models for dialog applications
Romal Thoppilan, Daniel De Freitas, Jamie Hall, Noam Shazeer, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Heng-Tze Cheng, Alicia Jin, Taylor Bos, Leslie Baker, Yu Du, et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Wordcraft: Story writing with large language models. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . ACM, New York, NY, 841–852
Ann Yuan, Andy Coenen, Emily Reif, and Daphne Ippolito. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Thematic analysis: A reflexive approach
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, and Nikki Hayfield. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4
Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar, Peter Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Scott Lundberg, et al · 2023
Closest in time.
Diagnosing infeasible optimization problems using large language models
Hao Chen, Gonzalo E Constante-Flores, and Can Li. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Ner4Opt: Named entity recognition for optimization modelling from natural language. In International Conference on Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research . Springer, 299–319
Parag Pravin Dakle, Serdar Kadıoğlu, Karthik Uppuluri, Regina Politi, Preethi Raghavan, SaiKrishna Rallabandi, and Ravisutha Srinivasamurthy. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
LIDA: A tool for automatic generation of grammar-agnostic visualizations and infographics using large language models. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations) . 113–126
Victor Dibia. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Toward supporting perceptual complementarity in human-AI collaboration via reflection on unobservables
Kenneth Holstein, Maria De-Arteaga, Lakshmi Tumati, and Yanghuidi Cheng. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models for supply chain optimization
Beibin Li, Konstantina Mellou, Bo Zhang, Jeevan Pathuri, and Ishai Menache. 2023a · 2023
Closest in time.
Eliciting human preferences with language models
Belinda Z Li, Alex Tamkin, Noah Goodman, and Jacob Andreas. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.
Augmented Language Models: a Survey
Grégoire Mialon, Roberto Dessi, Maria Lomeli, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Roberta Raileanu, Baptiste Roziere, Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Asli Celikyilmaz, Edouard Grave, Yann LeCun, and Thomas Scialom. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Challenging but connective: Large-scale characteristics of synchronous collaboration across time zones. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM, New York, NY, 1–17
Lillio Mok, Lu Sun, Shilad Sen, and Bahareh Sarrafzadeh. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
A novel approach for auto-formulation of optimization problems
Yuting Ning, Jiayu Liu, Longhu Qin, Tong Xiao, Shangzi Xue, Zhenya Huang, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, and Jinze Wu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Synthesis of mathematical programs from natural language specifications
Ganesh Prasath and Shirish Karande. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Limitations of language models in arithmetic and symbolic induction. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) . 9285–9298
Jing Qian, Hong Wang, Zekun Li, Shiyang Li, and Xifeng Yan. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Appropriate reliance on AI advice: Conceptualization and the effect of explanations. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 410–422
Max Schemmer, Niklas Kuehl, Carina Benz, Andrea Bartos, and Gerhard Satzger. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
On the interdependence of reliance behavior and accuracy in AI-assisted decision-making
Jakob Schoeffer, Johannes Jakubik, Michael Voessing, Niklas Kuehl, and Gerhard Satzger. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Holy Grail 2.0: From natural language to constraint models
Dimos Tsouros, Hélène Verhaeghe, Serdar Kadıoğlu, and Tias Guns. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations
Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
KITAB: Evaluating LLMs on constraint satisfaction for information retrieval. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations
Marah I Abdin, Suriya Gunasekar, Varun Chandrasekaran, Jerry Li, Mert Yuksekgonul, Rahee Ghosh Peshawaria, Ranjita Naik, and Besmira Nushi. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Legitimacy, authority, and democratic duties of explanation
Seth Lazar. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Decision-Oriented Dialogue for Human-AI Collaboration. In ICLR 2024 Workshop on Large Language Model (LLM) Agents
Jessy Lin, Nicholas Tomlin, Jacob Andreas, and Jason Eisner. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools
Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Explanations, fairness, and appropriate reliance in human-AI decision-making. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–18
Jakob Schoeffer, Maria De-Arteaga, and Niklas Kuehl. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Rhythm of work: Mixed-methods characterization of information workers scheduling preferences and practices
Lu Sun, Lillio Mok, Shilad Sen, and Bahar Sarrafzadeh. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models
Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Tom Griffiths, Yuan Cao, and Karthik Narasimhan. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Mert Yuksekgonul, Varun Chandrasekaran, Erik Jones, Suriya Gunasekar, Ranjita Naik, Hamid Palangi, Ece Kamar, and Besmira Nushi. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.