Emergence of Scale-Free Networks in Social Interactions among Large Language Models

P. W. Anderson, More is different: Broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure of science., Science 177

1972

Earlier work this paper cites.

A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, science 286

1999

Earlier work this paper cites.

S. N. Dorogovtsev, J. F. F. Mendes, and A. N. Samukhin, Structure of growing networks with preferential linking, Physical review letters 85

2000

Earlier work this paper cites.

R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani, Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks, Physical review letters 86

2001

Earlier work this paper cites.

L. Pietronero, E. Tosatti, V. Tosatti, and A. Vespignani, Explaining the uneven distribution of numbers in nature: the laws of benford and zipf, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 293

2001

Earlier work this paper cites.

M. E. Newman, Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks, Physical review E 64

2001

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. Capocci, V. D. Servedio, F. Colaiori, L. S. Buriol, D. Donato, S. Leonardi, and G. Caldarelli, Preferential attachment in the growth of social networks: The internet encyclopedia wikipedia, Physical review E 74

2006

Earlier work this paper cites.

A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. Newman, Power-law distributions in empirical data, SIAM review 51

2009

Earlier work this paper cites.

J. Alstott, E. Bullmore, and D. Plenz, powerlaw: a python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions, PloS one 9

2014

Earlier work this paper cites.

S.-Y. Teng, M.-Y. Yeh, and K.-T. Chuang, Toward understanding the mobile social properties: an analysis on instagram photo-sharing network, in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015 (2015) pp. 266–269

2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

S. Aparicio, J. Villazón-Terrazas, and G. Álvarez, A model for scale-free networks: application to twitter, Entropy 17

2015

Earlier work this paper cites.

G. K. Zipf, Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology (Ravenio Books, 2016)

2016

Earlier work this paper cites.

G. De Marzo, A. Gabrielli, A. Zaccaria, and L. Pietronero, Dynamical approach to zipf’s law, Physical Review Research 3

2021

Cited alongside, same era.

E. M. Bender, T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, and S. Shmitchell, On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?, in Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (2021) pp. 610–623

2021

Cited alongside, same era.

F. F. Xu, U. Alon, G. Neubig, and V. J. Hellendoorn, A systematic evaluation of large language models of code, in Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Machine Programming (2022) pp. 1–10

2022

Cited alongside, same era.

K. Valmeekam, A. Olmo, S. Sreedharan, and S. Kambhampati, Large language models still can’t plan (a benchmark for llms on planning and reasoning about change), arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10498 (2022)

Original

2022

Cited alongside, same era.

K. Singhal, S. Azizi, T. Tu, S. S. Mahdavi, J. Wei, H. W. Chung, N. Scales, A. Tanwani, H. Cole-Lewis, S. Pfohl, et al. , Large language models encode clinical knowledge, Nature 620

2023

Closest in time.

M. C. Frank, Baby steps in evaluating the capacities of large language models, Nature Reviews Psychology 2

2023

Closest in time.

T. Webb, K. J. Holyoak, and H. Lu, Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models, Nature Human Behaviour 7

2023

Closest in time.

P. Törnberg, D. Valeeva, J. Uitermark, and C. Bail, Simulating social media using large language models to evaluate alternative news feed algorithms, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05984 (2023)

Original

2023

Closest in time.

I. Grossmann, M. Feinberg, D. C. Parker, N. A. Christakis, P. E. Tetlock, and W. A. Cunningham, Ai and the transformation of social science research, Science 380