Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Moral foundations theory (MFT) is a psychological assessment tool that decomposes human moral reasoning into five factors, including care/harm, liberty/oppression, and sanctity/degradation (Graham et al., 2009).
The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the "big three" explanations of suffering
Richard A. Shweder, Nancy C. Much, Manamohan Mahapatra, and Lawrence Park. 1997 · 1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Relational models theory: A confirmatory factor analysis
Nick Haslam and Alan Page Fiske. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives
Oliver P. John and Sanjay Srivastava. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues
Jonathan Haidt and Craig Joseph. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Visualizing data using t-sne
Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations
Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt, and Brian Nosek. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mapping the moral domain
Jesse Graham, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena P. Koleva, and Peter H. Ditto. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Will morality or political ideology determine attitudes to climate change
Sharon L. Dawson and Graham A Tyson. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Moral intuitions and political orientation: Similarities and differences between south korea and the united states
Kisok Kim, Je-Sang Kang, and Seongyi Yun. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
How words do the work of politics: Moral foundations theory and the debate over stem cell research
Scott Clifford and Jennifer Jerit. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory
Martin V. Day, Susan T. Fiske, Emily L. Downing, and Thomas E. Trail. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Aligning books and movies: Towards story-like visual explanations by watching movies and reading books
Yukun Zhu, Ryan Kiros, Rich Zemel, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Which moral foundations predict willingness to make lifestyle changes to avert climate change in the usa?
Janis L. Dickinson, Poppy McLeod, Robert Bloomfield, and Shorna Allred. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
The congruency between moral foundations and intentions to donate, self-reported donations, and actual donations to charity
Artur Nilsson, Arvid Erlandsson, and Daniel Västfjäll. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
How are moral foundations associated with climate-friendly consumption?
Satu Annukka Vainio and Jaana-Piia Mäkiniemi. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire
Oliver Scott Curry, Matthew Jones Chesters, and Caspar J. Van Lissa. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
The politics of donations: Are red counties more donative than blue counties?
Laurie E. Paarlberg, Rebecca Nesbit, Richard M. Clerkin, and Robert K. Christensen. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
On the sizes of openai api models
Leo Gao. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Can machines learn morality? the delphi experiment
Liwei Jiang, Jena D. Hwang, Chandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Jenny Liang, Jesse Dodge, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Maxwell Forbes, Jon Borchardt, Saadia Gabriel, Yulia Tsvetkov, Oren Etzioni, Maarten Sap, Regina Rini, and Yejin Choi. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Gpt-3 powers the next generation of apps
Ashley Pilipiszyn. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Are conservatives more charitable than liberals in the u.s.? a meta-analysis of political ideology and charitable giving
Yongzheng Yang and Peixu Liu. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
The values encoded in machine learning research
Abeba Birhane, Pratyusha Kalluri, Dallas Card, William Agnew, Ravit Dotan, and Michelle Bao. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Does moral code have a moral code? probing delphi’s moral philosophy
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Persuasion for good: Towards a personalized persuasive dialogue system for social good
Xuewei Wang, Weiyan Shi, Richard Kim, Yoojung Oh, Sijia Yang, Jingwen Zhang, and Zhou Yu. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Psychological operations in digital political campaigns: Assessing cambridge analytica’s psychographic profiling and targeting
Vian Bakir. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Make up your mind! adversarial generation of inconsistent natural language explanations
Oana-Maria Camburu, Brendan Shillingford, Pasquale Minervini, Thomas Lukasiewicz, and Phil Blunsom. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Gpt-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences
Luciano Floridi and Massimo Chiriatti. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Persistent anti-muslim bias in large language models
Abubakar Abid, Maheen Farooqi, and James Zou. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?
Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Gpt-3: What’s it good for?
Robert Dale. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Kathleen C Fraser, Svetlana Kiritchenko, and Esma Balkir. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
The ghost in the machine has an american accent: value conflict in gpt-3
Rebecca L Johnson, Giada Pistilli, Natalia Menédez-González, Leslye Denisse Dias Duran, Enrico Panai, Julija Kalpokiene, and Donald Jay Bertulfo. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Who is gpt-3? an exploration of personality, values and demographics
Marilu Miotto, Nicola Rossberg, and Bennett Kleinberg. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Discovering language model behaviors with model-written evaluations
Ethan Perez, Sam Ringer, Kamilė Lukošiūtė, Karina Nguyen, Edwin Chen, Scott Heiner, Craig Pettit, Catherine Olsson, Sandipan Kundu, Saurav Kadavath, et al. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Moral mimicry: Large language models produce moral rationalizations tailored to political identity
Gabriel Simmons. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Emergent abilities of large language models
Jason Wei, Yi Tay, Rishi Bommasani, Colin Raffel, Barret Zoph, Sebastian Borgeaud, Dani Yogatama, Maarten Bosma, Denny Zhou, Donald Metzler, Ed H. Chi, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Oriol Vinyals, Percy Liang, Jeff Dean, and William Fedus. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
The unreliability of explanations in few-shot in-context learning
Xi Ye and Greg Durrett. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.