Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Computational argumentation has become an essential tool in various domains, including law, public policy, and artificial intelligence.
Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert
Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2019 · 1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
A richly annotated corpus for different tasks in automated fact-checking
Andreas Hanselowski, Christian Stab, Claudia Schulz, Zile Li, and Iryna Gurevych. 2019 · 1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages
Quinn Mcnemar. 1947 · 1947
Earlier work this paper cites.
Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries
Chin-Yew Lin. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach
Frans H Van Eemeren, Robert Grootendorst, and Rob Grootendorst. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, T. J. Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeff Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Argumentation schemes
Douglas Walton, Christopher Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Meteor 1.3: Automatic metric for reliable optimization and evaluation of machine translation systems
Michael Denkowski and Alon Lavie. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Argumentation mining
Raquel Mochales and Marie-Francine Moens. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Debatesum: A large-scale argument mining and summarization dataset
Allen Roush and Arvind Balaji. 2020 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: A survey
Andreas Peldszus and Manfred Stede. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
A benchmark dataset for automatic detection of claims and evidence in the context of controversial topics
Ehud Aharoni, Anatoly Polnarov, Tamar Lavee, Daniel Hershcovich, Ran Levy, Ruty Rinott, Dan Gutfreund, and Noam Slonim. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Introducing luima: an experiment in legal conceptual retrieval of vaccine injury decisions using a uima type system and tools
Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D Ashley, Ran Chen, Preethi Sureshkumar, Chen Wang, Eric Nyberg, and Vern R Walker. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Show me your evidence - an automatic method for context dependent evidence detection
Ruty Rinott, Lena Dankin, Carlos Alzate Perez, Mitesh M. Khapra, Ehud Aharoni, and Noam Slonim. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
“what is your evidence?” a study of controversial topics on social media
Aseel Addawood and Masooda N. Bashir. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Parsing argumentation structures in persuasive essays
Christian Stab and Iryna Gurevych. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Towards artificial argumentation
Katie Atkinson, Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin, Anthony Hunter, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Guillermo R. Simari, Matthias Thimm, and Serena Villata. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural end-to-end learning for computational argumentation mining
Steffen Eger, Johannes Daxenberger, and Iryna Gurevych. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
The argument reasoning comprehension task: Identification and reconstruction of implicit warrants
Ivan Habernal, Henning Wachsmuth, Iryna Gurevych, and Benno Stein. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A dataset for multi-target stance detection
Parinaz Sobhani, Diana Inkpen, and Xiaodan Zhu. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Computational argumentation quality assessment in natural language
Henning Wachsmuth, Nona Naderi, Yufang Hou, Yonatan Bilu, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Tim Alberdingk Thijm, Graeme Hirst, and Benno Stein. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Five years of argument mining: a data-driven analysis
Elena Cabrio and Serena Villata. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
The hitchhiker’s guide to testing statistical significance in natural language processing
Rotem Dror, Gili Baumer, Segev Shlomov, and Roi Reichart. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural argument generation augmented with externally retrieved evidence
Xinyu Hua and Lu Wang. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Will it blend? blending weak and strong labeled data in a neural network for argumentation mining
Eyal Shnarch, Carlos Alzate, Lena Dankin, Martin Gleize, Yufang Hou, Leshem Choshen, Ranit Aharonov, and Noam Slonim. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
FEVER: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and VERification
James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Retrieval of the best counterargument without prior topic knowledge
Henning Wachsmuth, Shahbaz Syed, and Benno Stein. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Argument invention from first principles
Yonatan Bilu, Ariel Gera, Daniel Hershcovich, Benjamin Sznajder, Dan Lahav, Guy Moshkowich, Anael Malet, Assaf Gavron, and Noam Slonim. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ampersand: Argument mining for persuasive online discussions
Tuhin Chakrabarty, Christopher Hidey, Smaranda Muresan, Kathleen McKeown, and Alyssa Hwang. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Language and argument: a review of the field
Martin Hinton. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Argument generation with retrieval, planning, and realization
Xinyu Hua, Zhe Hu, and Lu Wang. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards effective rebuttal: Listening comprehension using corpus-wide claim mining
Tamar Lavee, Matan Orbach, Lili Kotlerman, Yoav Kantor, Shai Gretz, Lena Dankin, Shachar Mirkin, Michal Jacovi, Yonatan Bilu, Ranit Aharonov, and Noam Slonim. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Touché: First shared task on argument retrieval
Llms to the moon? reddit market sentiment analysis with large language models
Xiang Deng, Vasilisa Bashlovkina, Feng Han, Simon Baumgartner, and Michael Bendersky. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Uncovering the potential of chatgpt for discourse analysis in dialogue: An empirical study
Yaxin Fan and Feng Jiang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Mathematical capabilities of chatgpt
Simon Frieder, Luca Pinchetti, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Tommaso Salvatori, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Philipp Christian Petersen, Alexis Chevalier, and J J Berner. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Unlocking the potential of user feedback: Leveraging large language model as user simulators to enhance dialogue system
Zhiyuan Hu, Yue Feng, Anh Tuan Luu, Bryan Hooi, and Aldo Lipani. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Alexander Bondarenko, Matthias Hagen, Martin Potthast, Henning Wachsmuth, Meriem Beloucif, Chris Biemann, Alexander Panchenko, and Benno Stein. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Exploring the role of argument structure in online debate persuasion
Jialu Li, Esin Durmus, and Claire Cardie. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer
Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Aspect-controlled neural argument generation
Benjamin Schiller, Johannes Daxenberger, and Iryna Gurevych. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Unsupervised expressive rules provide explainability and assist human experts grasping new domains
Eyal Shnarch, Leshem Choshen, Guy Moshkowich, Noam Slonim, and Ranit Aharonov. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Argument undermining: Counter-argument generation by attacking weak premises
Milad Alshomary, Shahbaz Syed, Martin Potthast, and Henning Wachsmuth. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Syntopical graphs for computational argumentation tasks
Joe Barrow, R. Jain, Nedim Lipka, Franck Dernoncourt, Vlad I. Morariu, Varun Manjunatha, Douglas W. Oard, Philip Resnik, and Henning Wachsmuth. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Wenxiang Jiao, Wenxuan Wang, Jen tse Huang, Xing Wang, and Zhaopeng Tu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
A systematic study and comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT on benchmark datasets
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, M Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman, Md Amran Hossen Bhuiyan, Shafiq Joty, and Jimmy Huang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Jinyang Li, Binyuan Hui, Ge Qu, Binhua Li, Jiaxi Yang, Bowen Li, Bailin Wang, Bowen Qin, Rongyu Cao, Ruiying Geng, Nan Huo, Chenhao Ma, Kevin C. Chang, Fei Huang, Reynold Cheng, and Yongbin Li. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
G-eval: NLG evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignment
Yang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang, Ruochen Xu, and Chenguang Zhu. 2023c · 2023
Closest in time.
Chatgpt as a factual inconsistency evaluator for abstractive text summarization
Zheheng Luo, Qianqian Xie, and Sophia Ananiadou. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Improving multimodal sentiment analysis: Supervised angular margin-based contrastive learning for enhanced fusion representation
Cong-Duy Nguyen, Thong Nguyen, Duc Vu, and Anh Luu. 2023a · 2023
Closest in time.
A spectral viewpoint on continual relation extraction
Huy Nguyen, Chien Nguyen, Linh Ngo, Anh Luu, and Thien Nguyen. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.
Introducing chatgpt
OpenAI. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
An independent evaluation of chatgpt on mathematical word problems (MWP)
Paulo Shakarian, Abhinav Koyyalamudi, Noel Ngu, and Lakshmivihari Mareedu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Large language models are not yet human-level evaluators for abstractive summarization
Chenhui Shen, Liying Cheng, Yang You, and Lidong Bing. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Evaluation of chatgpt as a question answering system for answering complex questions
Yiming Tan, Dehai Min, Y. Li, Wenbo Li, Na Hu, Yongrui Chen, and Guilin Qi. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Exploring the limits of chatgpt for query or aspect-based text summarization
Xianjun Yang, Yan Li, Xinlu Zhang, Haifeng Chen, and Wei Cheng. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Zero-shot temporal relation extraction with chatgpt
Chenhan Yuan, Qianqian Xie, and Sophia Ananiadou. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Prompt as triggers for backdoor attack: Examining the vulnerability in language models
Shuai Zhao, Jinming Wen, Luu Anh Tuan, Junbo Zhao, and Jie Fu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Yandan Zheng, Anran Hao, and Anh Tuan Luu. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Can chatgpt understand too? a comparative study on chatgpt and fine-tuned bert
Qihuang Zhong, Liang Ding, Juhua Liu, Bo Du, and Dacheng Tao. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Toxcl: A unified framework for toxic speech detection and explanation
Nhat M Hoang, Xuan Long Do, Duc Anh Do, Duc Anh Vu, and Luu Anh Tuan. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Chatgpt: A meta-analysis after 2.5 months
Christoph Leiter, Ran Zhang, Yanran Chen, Jonas Belouadi, Daniil Larionov, Vivian Fresen, and Steffen Eger. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Is translation all you need? a study on solving multilingual tasks with large language models
Chaoqun Liu, Wenxuan Zhang, Yiran Zhao, Anh Tuan Luu, and Lidong Bing. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Chatgpt as a math questioner? evaluating chatgpt on generating pre-university math questions
Phuoc Van Long Pham, Anh Vu Duc, Nhat Minh Hoang, Xuan Long Do, and Anh Tuan Luu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Harnessing the power of llms in practice: A survey on chatgpt and beyond
Jingfeng Yang, Hongye Jin, Ruixiang Tang, Xiaotian Han, Qizhang Feng, Haoming Jiang, Shaochen Zhong, Bing Yin, and Xia Hu. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Defending against weight-poisoning backdoor attacks for parameter-efficient fine-tuning
Shuai Zhao, Leilei Gan, Luu Anh Tuan, Jie Fu, Lingjuan Lyu, Meihuizi Jia, and Jinming Wen. 2024 · 2024
Closest in time.
Towards an argumentative content search engine using weak supervision
Ran Levy, Ben Bogin, Shai Gretz, Ranit Aharonov, and Noam Slonim. 2018a · 2081
Closest in time.