Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in educational tasks such as providing writing suggestions to students.
Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis
William H Kruskal and W Allen Wallis. 1952 · 1952
Earlier work this paper cites.
Robust tests for equality of variances
Howard Levene. 1960 · 1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
Samuel Sanford Shapiro and Martin B Wilk. 1965 · 1965
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evaluation of fairness trade-offs in predicting student success
Hansol Lee and René F Kizilcec. 2020 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
A new dataset and method for automatically grading ESOL texts
Helen Yannakoudakis, Ted Briscoe, and Ben Medlock. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automated Essay Scoring for Swedish
Robert Östling, André Smolentzov, Björn Tyrefors Hinnerich, and Erik Höglin. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dependency-based word embeddings
Omer Levy and Yoav Goldberg. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings
Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, James Y Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and Adam T Kalai. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
Aylin Caliskan, Joanna J Bryson, and Arvind Narayanan. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Social bias in elicited natural language inferences
Rachel Rudinger, Chandler May, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Examining gender and race bias in two hundred sentiment analysis systems
Svetlana Kiritchenko and Saif Mohammad. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
ArguminSci: A tool for analyzing argumentation and rhetorical aspects in scientific writing
Anne Lauscher, Goran Glavaš, and Kai Eckert. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gender bias in neural natural language processing
Kaiji Lu, Piotr Mardziel, Fangjing Wu, Preetam Amancharla, and Anupam Datta. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Identifying and reducing gender bias in word-level language models
Shikha Bordia and Samuel R. Bowman. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Exploring human gender stereotypes with word association test
Yupei Du, Yuanbin Wu, and Man Lan. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
50 years of test (un)fairness: Lessons for machine learning
Ben Hutchinson and Margaret Mitchell. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
On measuring social biases in sentence encoders
Chandler May, Alex Wang, Shikha Bordia, Samuel R. Bowman, and Rachel Rudinger. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
QuizBot: A Dialogue-based Adaptive Learning System System for Factual Knowledge
Sherry Ruan, Liwei Jiang, Justin Xu, Bryce Joe-Kun Tham, Zhengneng Qiu, Yeshuang Zhu, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Emma Brunskill, and James A. Landay. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Evaluating gender bias in machine translation
Gabriel Stanovsky, Noah A. Smith, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Helpfulness of online reviews: Examining review informativeness and classification thresholds by search products and experience products
Xinyu Sun, Maoxin Han, and Juan Feng. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Supporting Students in the Peer-Review Process by Recommending Features of Written Feedback that Should be Improved
Konstantin Bauman, Roman Rietsche, and Matthias Söllner. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Capturing failures of large language models via human cognitive biases
Erik Jones and Jacob Steinhardt. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Preparing high school teachers to integrate ai methods into stem classrooms
Irene Lee and Beatriz Perret. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Coauthor: Designing a human-ai collaborative writing dataset for exploring language model capabilities
Mina Lee, Percy Liang, and Qian Yang. 2022a · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
An empirical survey of the effectiveness of debiasing techniques for pre-trained language models
Nicholas Meade, Elinor Poole-Dayan, and Siva Reddy. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
The undesirable dependence on frequency of gender bias metrics based on word embeddings
Francisco Valentini, Germán Rosati, Diego Fernandez Slezak, and Edgar Altszyler. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of “bias” in NLP
Su Lin Blodgett, Solon Barocas, Hal Daumé III, and Hanna Wallach. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Multi-dimensional gender bias classification
Emily Dinan, Angela Fan, Ledell Wu, Jason Weston, Douwe Kiela, and Adina Williams. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Cultural differences in bias? origin and gender bias in pre-trained german and french word embeddings
Mascha Kurpicz-Briki. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Gender bias impacts top-merited candidates
Emma Rachel Andersson, Carolina E. Hagberg, and Sara Hägg. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Algorithmic bias in education
Ryan S Baker and Aaron Hawn. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Five sources of bias in natural language processing
Dirk Hovy and Shrimai Prabhumoye. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards a trust reliance paradox? exploring the gap between perceived trust in and reliance on algorithmic advice
Anuschka Schmitt, Thiemo Wambsganss, Matthias Söllner, and Andreas Janson. 2021 · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Thiemo Wambsganss, Matthias Söllner, Kenneth R Koedinger, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2022a · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Bias at a second glance: A deep dive into bias for german educational peer-review data modeling
Thiemo Wambsganss, Vinitra Swamy, Roman Rietsche, and Tanja Käser. 2022b · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
The second workshop on intelligent and interactive writing assistants
Minsuk Chang, John Joon Young Chung, Katy Ilonka Gero, Ting-Hao Kenneth Huang, Dongyeop Kang, Mina Lee, Vipul Raheja, and Thiemo Wambsganss. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Holistic evaluation of language models
Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, Benjamin Newman, Binhang Yuan, Bobby Yan, Ce Zhang, Christian Alexander Cosgrove, Christopher D Manning, Christopher Re, Diana Acosta-Navas, Drew Arad Hudson, Eric Zelikman, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Frieda Rong, Hongyu Ren, Huaxiu Yao, Jue WANG, Keshav Santhanam, Laurel Orr, Lucia Zheng, Mert Yuksekgonul, Mirac Suzgun, Nathan Kim, Neel Guha, Niladri S. Chatterji, Omar Khattab, Peter Henderson, Qian Huang, Ryan Andrew Chi, Sang Michael Xie, Shibani Santurkar, Surya Ganguli, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Thomas Icard, Tianyi Zhang, Vishrav Chaudhary, William Wang, Xuechen Li, Yifan Mai, Yuhui Zhang, and Yuta Koreeda. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Mind the biases: Quantifying cognitive biases in language model prompting
Ruixi Lin and Hwee Tou Ng. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Co-writing screenplays and theatre scripts with language models: Evaluation by industry professionals
Piotr Mirowski, Kory W. Mathewson, Jaylen Pittman, and Richard Evans. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Reviewriter: AI-generated instructions for peer review writing
Xiaotian Su, Thiemo Wambsganss, Roman Rietsche, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, and Tanja Kser. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Fairpy: A toolkit for evaluation of social biases and their mitigation in large language models
Hrishikesh Viswanath and Tianyi Zhang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Structured persuasive writing support in legal education: A model and tool for german legal case solutions
Florian Weber, Thiemo Wambsganss, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, and Matthias Soellner. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Evaluating reading comprehension exercises generated by LLMs: A showcase of ChatGPT in education applications
Changrong Xiao, Sean Xin Xu, Kunpeng Zhang, Yufang Wang, and Lei Xia. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.