Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Predictive models for identifying at-risk students early can help teaching staff direct resources to better support them, but there is a growing concern about the fairness of algorithmic systems in education.
Certifying and removing disparate impact
M. Feldman, S. A. Friedler, J. Moeller, C. Scheidegger, and S. Venkatasubramanian · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
A. Chouldechova · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning
M. Hardt, E. Price, E. Price, and N. Srebro · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
J. M. Kleinberg, S. Mullainathan, and M. Raghavan · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Fairer but not fair enough on the equitability of knowledge tracing
S. Doroudi and E. Brunskill · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Evaluating the fairness of predictive student models through slicing analysis
J. Gardner, C. Brooks, and R. Baker · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Yu, Q. Li, C. Fischer, S. Doroudi, and D. Xu
Cited in the paper.
Evaluating fairness and generalizability in models predicting on-time graduation from college applications
S. Hutt, M. Gardner, A. L. Duckworth, and S. K. D’Mello · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
The implicit fairness criterion of unconstrained learning
L. T. Liu, M. Simchowitz, and M. Hardt · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
The many dimensions of algorithmic fairness in educational applications
A. Loukina, N. Madnani, and K. Zechner · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…