Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Generative artificial systems (GenAI) have experienced exponential growth in the past couple of years.
First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development
Patrick T Terenzini, Leonard Springer, Patricia M Yaeger, Ernest T Pascarella, and Amaury Nora. 1996 · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Information foraging
Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Information needs in collocated software development teams. In 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’07) . IEEE, 344–353
Amy J Ko, Robert DeLine, and Gina Venolia. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Completing college: Assessing graduation rates at four-year institutions
Linda DeAngelo, Ray Franke, Sylvia Hurtado, John H Pryor, and Serge Tran. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Theoretical considerations and development of a questionnaire to measure trust in automation. In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) . Springer, 13–30
Moritz Körber. 2019 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?
Annette M O’Connor, Guy Tsafnat, James Thomas, Paul Glasziou, Stephen B Gilbert, and Brian Hutton. 2019 · 2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
Alejandro Barredo Arrieta, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier Del Ser, Adrien Bennetot, Siham Tabik, Alberto Barbado, Salvador García, Sergio Gil-López, Daniel Molina, Richard Benjamins, et al · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
AI in education: learner choice and fundamental rights
Bettina Berendt, Allison Littlejohn, and Michael Blakemore. 2020 · 2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Formalizing trust in artificial intelligence: Prerequisites, causes and goals of human trust in AI. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency . 624–635
Alon Jacovi, Ana Marasović, Tim Miller, and Yoav Goldberg. 2021a · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI. In FAccT ’21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Virtual Event / Toronto, Canada, March 3-10, 2021 , Madeleine Clare Elish, William Isaac, and Richard S. Zemel (Eds.). ACM, 624–635
Alon Jacovi, Ana Marasovic, Tim Miller, and Yoav Goldberg. 2021b · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
How weird is CHI?. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–14
Sebastian Linxen, Christian Sturm, Florian Brühlmann, Vincent Cassau, Klaus Opwis, and Katharina Reinecke. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical Methodologies
Oleksandra Vereschak, Gilles Bailly, and Baptiste Caramiaux. 2021 · 2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ruijia Cheng, Ruotong Wang, Thomas Zimmermann, and Denae Ford. 2022 · 2022
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Robots Are Coming: Exploring the Implications of OpenAI Codex on Introductory Programming. In ACE ’22: Australasian Computing Education Conference, Virtual Event, February 14 - 18, 2022 , Judy Sheard and Paul Denny (Eds.). ACM, 10–19
James Finnie-Ansley, Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and James Prather. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Reading Between the Lines: Modeling User Behavior and Costs in AI-Assisted Programming
Hussein Mozannar, Gagan Bansal, Adam Fourney, and Eric Horvitz. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot’s Code Contributions. In 43rd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2022, San Francisco, CA, USA, May 22-26, 2022 . IEEE, 754–768
Hammond Pearce, Baleegh Ahmad, Benjamin Tan, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, and Ramesh Karri. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Do Users Write More Insecure Code with AI Assistants?
Neil Perry, Megha Srivastava, Deepak Kumar, and Dan Boneh. 2022 · 2022
Computing Education in the Era of Generative AI
Paul Denny, James Prather, Brett A Becker, James Finnie-Ansley, Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Brent N Reeves, Eddie Antonio Santos, and Sami Sarsa. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Exploring the Responses of Large Language Models to Beginner Programmers’ Help Requests
Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Sami Sarsa, Charles Koutcheme, Lilja Kujanpää, and Juha Sorva. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Samia Kabir, David N Udo-Imeh, Bonan Kou, and Tianyi Zhang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Studying the effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory Programming
Majeed Kazemitabaar, Justin Chow, Carl Ka To Ma, Barbara J Ericson, David Weintrop, and Tovi Grossman. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations using Large Language Models
Sami Sarsa, Paul Denny, Arto Hellas, and Juho Leinonen. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Expectation vs. Experience: Evaluating the Usability of Code Generation Tools Powered by Large Language Models. In CHI ’22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA, 29 April 2022 - 5 May 2022, Extended Abstracts . ACM, 332:1–332:7
Priyan Vaithilingam, Tianyi Zhang, and Elena L. Glassman. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Emergent abilities of large language models
Jason Wei, Yi Tay, Rishi Bommasani, Colin Raffel, Barret Zoph, Sebastian Borgeaud, Dani Yogatama, Maarten Bosma, Denny Zhou, Donald Metzler, et al · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
In-IDE Code Generation from Natural Language: Promise and Challenges
Frank F. Xu, Bogdan Vasilescu, and Graham Neubig. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Productivity assessment of neural code completion. In MAPS@PLDI 2022: 6th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Machine Programming, San Diego, CA, USA, 13 June 2022 , Swarat Chaudhuri and Charles Sutton (Eds.). ACM, 21–29
Albert Ziegler, Eirini Kalliamvakou, X. Alice Li, Andrew Rice, Devon Rifkin, Shawn Simister, Ganesh Sittampalam, and Edward Aftandilian. 2022 · 2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards Characterizing Trust in Generative Artificial Intelligence among Students. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research-Volume 2 . 3–4
Matin Amoozadeh, David Daniels, Stella Chen, Daye Nam, Aayush Kumar, Michael Hilton, Mohammad Amin Alipour, and Sruti Srinivasa Ragavan. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Yejin Bang, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Nayeon Lee, Wenliang Dai, Dan Su, Bryan Wilie, Holy Lovenia, Ziwei Ji, Tiezheng Yu, Willy Chung, et al · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating Models
Shraddha Barke, Michael B. James, and Nadia Polikarpova. 2023 · 2023
Cited alongside, same era.
From" Ban It Till We Understand It" to" Resistance is Futile": How University Programming Instructors Plan to Adapt as More Students Use AI Code Generation and Explanation Tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot
Sam Lau and Philip J Guo. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Comparing Code Explanations Created by Students and Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, ITiCSE 2023, Turku, Finland, July 7-12, 2023 , Mikko-Jussi Laakso, Mattia Monga, Simon, and Judithe Sheard (Eds.). ACM, 124–130
Juho Leinonen, Paul Denny, Stephen MacNeil, Sami Sarsa, Seth Bernstein, Joanne Kim, Andrew Tran, and Arto Hellas. 2023a · 2023
Closest in time.
Comparing Code Explanations Created by Students and Large Language Models
Juho Leinonen, Paul Denny, Stephen MacNeil, Sami Sarsa, Seth Bernstein, Joanne Kim, Andrew Tran, and Arto Hellas. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.
Understanding the Usability of AI Programming Assistants
Jenny T. Liang, Chenyang Yang, and Brad A. Myers. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?
Brady D Lund and Ting Wang. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
James Prather, Brent N Reeves, Paul Denny, Brett A Becker, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Garrett Powell, James Finnie-Ansley, and Eddie Antonio Santos. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
The Programmer’s Assistant: Conversational Interaction with a Large Language Model for Software Development. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2023, Sydney, NSW, March 27-31, 2023 . ACM, 491–514
Steven I. Ross, Fernando Martinez, Stephanie Houde, Michael J. Muller, and Justin D. Weisz. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Investigating and Designing for Trust in AI-powered Code Generation Tools
Ruotong Wang, Ruijia Cheng, Denae Ford, and Thomas Zimmermann. 2023a · 2023
Closest in time.
Towards Adapting Computer Science Courses to AI Assistants’ Capabilities
Tianjia Wang, Daniel Vargas-Diaz, Chris Brown, and Yan Chen. 2023b · 2023
Closest in time.