Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Double-blind peer review mechanism has become the skeleton of academic research across multiple disciplines including computer science, yet several studies have questioned the quality of peer reviews and raised concerns on potential biases in the process.
Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. In Soviet physics doklady , Vol. 10. Soviet Union, 707–710
Vladimir I Levenshtein et al · 1966
Earlier work this paper cites.
Exploratory data analysis . Vol. 2
John W Tukey et al · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
A survey automatic text summarization
Oguzhan Tas and Farzad Kiyani. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Visualizing data using t-SNE
Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference . 214–226
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experiment
Corinna Cortes and Neil D. Lawrence. 2021 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Certifying and removing disparate impact. In proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining . 259–268
Michael Feldman, Sorelle A Friedler, John Moeller, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasubramanian. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nati Srebro. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cross-Lingual Named Entity Recognition via Wikification. In Proceedings of The 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning . Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, 219–228
Chen-Tse Tsai, Stephen Mayhew, and Dan Roth. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) . Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1647–1661
Dongyeop Kang, Waleed Ammar, Bhavana Dalvi, Madeleine van Zuylen, Sebastian Kohlmeier, Eduard Hovy, and Roy Schwartz. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2019, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 2-7, 2019, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) , Jill Burstein, Christy Doran, and Thamar Solorio (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1274–1290
Yang Gao, Steffen Eger, Ilia Kuznetsov, Iryna Gurevych, and Yusuke Miyao. 2019 · 2019
Mitigating Manipulation in Peer Review via Randomized Reviewer Assignments. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual , Hugo Larochelle, Marc’Aurelio Ranzato, Raia Hadsell, Maria-Florina Balcan, and Hsuan-Tien Lin (Eds.)
Steven Jecmen, Hanrui Zhang, Ryan Liu, Nihar B. Shah, Vincent Conitzer, and Fei Fang. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
What Can We Do to Improve Peer Review in NLP?. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, Online Event, 16-20 November 2020 (Findings of ACL, Vol. EMNLP 2020) , Trevor Cohn, Yulan He, and Yang Liu (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1256–1262
Anna Rogers and Isabelle Augenstein. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
ReviewRobot: Explainable Paper Review Generation based on Knowledge Synthesis. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Natural Language Generation, INLG 2020, Dublin, Ireland, December 15-18, 2020 , Brian Davis, Yvette Graham, John D. Kelleher, and Yaji Sripada (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 384–397
Qingyun Wang, Qi Zeng, Lifu Huang, Kevin Knight, Heng Ji, and Nazneen Fatema Rajani. 2020 · 2020
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Argument Mining for Understanding Peer Reviews. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2019, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 2-7, 2019, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) , Jill Burstein, Christy Doran, and Thamar Solorio (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2131–2137
Xinyu Hua, Mitko Nikolov, Nikhil Badugu, and Lu Wang. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
CiteTracked: A Longitudinal Dataset of Peer Reviews and Citations. In Proceedings of the 4th Joint Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval and Natural Language Processing for Digital Libraries (BIRNDL 2019) co-located with the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2019), Paris, France, July 25, 2019 (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2414) , Muthu Kumar Chandrasekaran and Philipp Mayr (Eds.). CEUR-WS.org, 116–122
Barbara Plank and Reinard van Dalen. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
On Testing for Biases in Peer Review. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8-14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada , Hanna M. Wallach, Hugo Larochelle, Alina Beygelzimer, Florence d’Alché-Buc, Emily B. Fox, and Roman Garnett (Eds.). 5287–5297
Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar B. Shah, and Aarti Singh. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer
Iz Beltagy, Matthew E. Peters, and Arman Cohan. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformers. In ACL
Arman Cohan, Sergey Feldman, Iz Beltagy, Doug Downey, and Daniel S. Weld. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Maya Burhanpurkar, Zhun Deng, Cynthia Dwork, and Linjun Zhang. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Uncovering Latent Biases in Text: Method and Application to Peer Review. In Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2021, The Eleventh Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2021, Virtual Event, February 2-9, 2021 . AAAI Press, 4767–4775
Emaad A. Manzoor and Nihar B. Shah. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process
David Tran, Alexander V Valtchanov, Keshav R Ganapathy, Raymond Feng, Eric Victor Slud, Micah Goldblum, and Tom Goldstein. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?
Weizhe Yuan, Pengfei Liu, and Graham Neubig. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Yes-Yes-Yes: Donation-based Peer Reviewing Data Collection for ACL Rolling Review and Beyond
Nils Dycke, Ilia Kuznetsov, and Iryna Gurevych. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.