Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
With the increasing popularity of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, smart contracts have become a prominent feature in developing decentralized applications.
J. Cohen, “A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales,” Educational and psychological measurement , vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 1960
1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system,” Decentralized business review , p. 21260, 2008
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Spencer, Card sorting: Designing usable categories . Rosenfeld Media, 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Wood, “Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger,” Ethereum Project Yellow Paper , 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Wood et al. , “Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger,” Ethereum project yellow paper , vol. 151, no. 2014, pp. 1–32, 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
(Nov., 2015) Erc-20: Token standard. [Online]. Available: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Luu, D.-H. Chu, H. Olickel, P. Saxena, and A. Hobor, “Making smart contracts smarter,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security , 2016, pp. 254–269
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
(Nov., 2017) Parity wallet security alert. [Online]. Available: https://www.parity.io/blog/security-alert-2/
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Atzei, M. Bartoletti, and T. Cimoli, “A survey of attacks on ethereum smart contracts (sok),” in Principles of Security and Trust: 6th International Conference, POST 2017, Held as Part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2017, Uppsala, Sweden, April 22-29, 2017, Proceedings 6 . Springer, 2017, pp. 164–186
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H.-N. Dai, X. Chen, and H. Wang, “Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey,” International journal of web and grid services , vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 352–375, 2018
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
(Mar., 2018) openzeppelin-contracts ECRecovery.sol. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/e299a7950e31f35809339316dbbda894c6b52e01/contracts/ECRecovery.sol
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
(Oct., 2018) Solidity security: Comprehensive list of known attack vectors and common anti-patterns. [Online]. Available: https://blog.sigmaprime.io/solidity-security.html
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
(Nov., 2018) Classification of smart contract vulnerabilities. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/smartdec/classification
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Nikolić, A. Kolluri, I. Sergey, P. Saxena, and A. Hobor, “Finding the greedy, prodigal, and suicidal contracts at scale,” in Proceedings of the 34th annual computer security applications conference , 2018, pp. 653–663
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Jiang, Y. Liu, and W. K. Chan, “Contractfuzzer: Fuzzing smart contracts for vulnerability detection,” in Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering , 2018, pp. 259–269
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Grishchenko, M. Maffei, and C. Schneidewind, “A semantic framework for the security analysis of ethereum smart contracts,” in Principles of Security and Trust: 7th International Conference, POST 2018, Held as Part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2018, Thessaloniki, Greece, April 14-20, 2018, Proceedings 7 . Springer, 2018, pp. 243–269
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Kalra, S. Goel, M. Dhawan, and S. Sharma, “Zeus: analyzing safety of smart contracts.” in Ndss , 2018, pp. 1–12
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
W. Zou, D. Lo, P. S. Kochhar, X.-B. D. Le, X. Xia, Y. Feng, Z. Chen, and B. Xu, “Smart contract development: Challenges and opportunities,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 2084–2106, 2019
H. Zhou, A. Milani Fard, and A. Makanju, “The state of ethereum smart contracts security: vulnerabilities, countermeasures, and tool support,” Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 358–378, 2022
2022
Later among the works it cites.
(Mar., 2023) Solidity. [Online]. Available: https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.19/
2023
Closest in time.
(Mar., 2023) Etherscan. [Online]. Available: https://etherscan.io/
2023
Closest in time.
(Jan., 2023) Openzeppelin docs. [Online]. Available: https://docs.openzeppelin.com/
2023
Closest in time.
(Apr., 2023) Decentralized application security project. [Online]. Available: https://dasp.co/
2023
Closest in time.
(Apr., 2023) Swc - github issues. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/SmartContractSecurity/SWC-registry/issues
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
J. He, M. Balunović, N. Ambroladze, P. Tsankov, and M. Vechev, “Learning to fuzz from symbolic execution with application to smart contracts,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , 2019, pp. 531–548
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H.-N. Dai, W. Chen, X. Chen, J. Weng, and M. Imran, “An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms,” Future Generation Computer Systems , vol. 105, pp. 475–491, 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Chen, R. Cao, T. Li, X. Luo, G. Gu, Y. Zhang, Z. Liao, H. Zhu, G. Chen, Z. He et al. , “Soda: A generic online detection framework for smart contracts.” in NDSS , 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
J. F. Ferreira, P. Cruz, T. Durieux, and R. Abreu, “Smartbugs: A framework to analyze solidity smart contracts,” in Proceedings of the 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering , 2020, pp. 1349–1352
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Zhang, F. Xiao, and X. Luo, “A framework and dataset for bugs in ethereum smart contracts,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 139–150
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Kaleem, A. Mavridou, and A. Laszka, “Vyper: A security comparison with solidity based on common vulnerabilities,” in 2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 107–111
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Argañaraz, M. Berón, M. J. Pereira, and P. R. Henriques, “Detection of vulnerabilities in smart contracts specifications in ethereum platforms,” in 9th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2020) , vol. 83. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2020, pp. 1–16
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
(Mar., 2023) What is the difference between a vulnerability and a weakness? [Online]. Available: https://www.ccf.org.cn/Academic_Evaluation/By_category/
2023
Closest in time.
(Mar., 2023) Bnb smart chain explorer. [Online]. Available: https://bscscan.com/
2023
Closest in time.
(Mar., 2023) Ethereum virtual machine (evm). [Online]. Available: https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/evm/
2023
Closest in time.
(Apr., 2023) Smart contract weakness classification and test cases. [Online]. Available: https://swcregistry.io/
2023
Closest in time.
(Mar., 2023) Ccf recommended international academic conferences and journals. [Online]. Available: https://www.ccf.org.cn/Academic_Evaluation/By_category/
2023
Closest in time.
(Apr., 2023) Swe list. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/InPlusLab/SWE
2023
Closest in time.
(Mar., 2023) Checks effects interactions - solidity. [Online]. Available: https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/security-considerations.html
2023
Closest in time.
(Jan., 2023) Openzeppelin docs - SafeERC20. [Online]. Available: https://docs.openzeppelin.com/contracts/4.x/api/token/erc20#SafeERC20
2023
Closest in time.
(Apr., 2023) solidity-security-blog. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/sigp/solidity-security-blog
2023
Closest in time.