Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are ubiquitous in almost all levels of education since they are easy to administer, grade, and are a reliable form of assessment.
Educational assessment of students
Anthony J. Nitko · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications
Peter Airasian · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei jing Zhu · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries
Chin-Yew Lin · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments
Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom
Kenneth R. Koedinger and Albert Corbett · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cognitive tutor: Applied research in mathematics education
Steven Ritter, John R. Anderson, Kenneth R. Koedinger, and Albert Corbett · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adding teacher-created motivational video to an its
Kim Kelly, Neil Heffernan, Sidney D’Mello, Namais Jeffrey, and Amber C. Strain · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatic generation and delivery of multiple-choice math quizzes
Ana Paula Tomás and José Paulo Leal · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automated feedback generation for introductory programming assignments
Rishabh Singh, Sumit Gulwani, and Armando Solar-Lezama · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Feedback generation for performance problems in introductory programming assignments
Sumit Gulwani, Ivan Radiček, and Florian Zuleger · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mathematical language processing: Automatic grading and feedback for open response mathematical questions
Andrew S. Lan, Divyanshu Vats, Andrew E. Waters, and Richard G. Baraniuk · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Educational testing and measurement
Tom Kubiszyn and Gary Borich · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Modeling common misconceptions in learning process data
Ran Liu, Rony Patel, and Kenneth R. Koedinger · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Multiple choice question generation utilizing an ontology
Katherine Stasaski and Marti A Hearst · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic distractor generation for multiple-choice english vocabulary questions
Yuni Susanti, Takenobu Tokunaga, Hitoshi Nishikawa, and Hiroyuki Obari · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Generating feedback for English foreign language exercises
Björn Rudzewitz, Ramon Ziai, Kordula De Kuthy, Verena Möller, Florian Nuxoll, and Detmar Meurers · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Generating distractors for reading comprehension questions from real examinations
Yifan Gao, Lidong Bing, Piji Li, Irwin King, and Michael R Lyu · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Toward automated content feedback generation for non-native spontaneous speech
Su-Youn Yoon, Ching-Ni Hsieh, Klaus Zechner, Matthew Mulholland, Yuan Wang, and Nitin Madnani · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic generation of problems and explanations for an intelligent algebra tutor
Math multiple choice question solving and distractor generation with attentional gru networks
Neisarg Dave, Riley Bakes, Barton Pursel, and C Lee Giles · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Context-aware and data-driven feedback generation for programming assignments
Dowon Song, Woosuk Lee, and Hakjoo Oh · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Math operation embeddings for open-ended solution analysis and feedback, 2021
Mengxue Zhang, Zichao Wang, Richard Baraniuk, and Andrew Lan · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
What makes good in-context examples for gpt-3
Jiachang Liu, Dinghan Shen, Yizhe Zhang, Bill Dolan, Lawrence Carin, and Weizhu Chen · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Evaluating large language models trained on code, 2021
Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, Alex Ray, Raul Puri, Gretchen Krueger, Michael Petrov, Heidy Khlaaf, Girish Sastry, Pamela Mishkin, Brooke Chan, Scott Gray, Nick Ryder, Mikhail Pavlov, Alethea Power, Lukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Bavarian, Clemens Winter, Philippe Tillet, Felipe Petroski Such, Dave Cummings, Matthias Plappert, Fotios Chantzis, Elizabeth Barnes, Ariel Herbert-Voss, William Hebgen Guss, Alex Nichol, Alex Paino, Nikolas Tezak, Jie Tang, Igor Babuschkin, Suchir Balaji, Shantanu Jain, William Saunders, Christopher Hesse, Andrew N. Carr, Jan Leike, Josh Achiam, Vedant Misra, Evan Morikawa, Alec Radford, Matthew Knight, Miles Brundage, Mira Murati, Katie Mayer, Peter Welinder, Bob McGrew, Dario Amodei, Sam McCandlish, Ilya Sutskever, and Wojciech Zaremba · 2021
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Eleanor O’Rourke, Eric Butler, Armando D. Tolentino, and Zoran Popovic’ · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks
Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic distractor generation for multiple choice questions in standard tests
Zhaopeng Qiu, Xian Wu, and Wei Fan · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Effectiveness of crowd-sourcing on-demand assistance from teachers in online learning platforms
Thanaporn Patikorn and Neil T Heffernan · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Effect of immediate feedback on math achievement at the high school level
Renah Razzaq, Korinn S. Ostrow, and Neil T. Heffernan · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Automated personalized feedback improves learning gains in an intelligent tutoring system
Ekaterina Kochmar, Dung Do Vu, Robert Belfer, Varun Gupta, Iulian Vlad Serban, and Joelle Pineau · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Cdgp: Automatic cloze distractor generation based on pre-trained language model
Shang-Hsuan Chiang, Ssu-Cheng Wang, and Yao-Chung Fan · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
End-to-end generation of multiple-choice questions using text-to-text transfer transformer models
Ricardo Rodriguez-Torrealba, Eva Garcia-Lopez, and Antonio Garcia-Cabot · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Grading programming assignments with an automated grading and feedback assistant
Marcus Messer · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
A context-aware approach to personalized feedback for novice programmers
Hemilis Joyse Barbosa Rocha, Patrícia Cabral de Azevedo Restelli Tedesco, and Evandro de Barros Costa · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Insta-reviewer: A data-driven approach for generating instant feedback on students’ project reports
Qinjin Jia, Mitchell Young, Yunkai Xiao, Jialin Cui, Chengyuan Liu, Parvez Rashid, and Edward Gehringer · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
The specificity and helpfulness of peer-to-peer feedback in higher education
Roman Rietsche, Andrew Caines, Cornelius Schramm, Dominik Pfütze, and Paula Buttery · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Starting from “zero”: An incremental zero-shot learning approach for assessing peer feedback comments
Qinjin Jia, Yupeng Cao, and Edward Gehringer · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
OpenAI · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Qdg: A unified model for automatic question-distractor pairs generation
Pengju Shuai, Li Li, Sishun Liu, and Jun Shen · 2023
Closest in time.