Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Since its launch in November 2022, ChatGPT has gained popularity among users, especially programmers who use it as a tool to solve development problems.
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Li, G. Q. Chen, C. Chen, Y. Zou, and S. Xu, “Ropgen: Towards robust code authorship attribution via automatic coding style transformation,” in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, p. 1906–1918. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3510003.3510181
1918
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. McNemar, “Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages,” Psychometrika , vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 153–157, 1947
1947
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Holm, “A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure,” Scandinavian journal of statistics , pp. 65–70, 1979
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. D. Liang, Introduction to Java programming . Pearson Education India, 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Menzies, A. Butcher, D. R. Cok, A. Marcus, L. Layman, F. Shull, B. Turhan, and T. Zimmermann, “Local versus global lessons for defect prediction and effort estimation,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng. , vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 822–834, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2012.83
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Bosu, M. Greiler, and C. Bird, “Characteristics of useful code reviews: An empirical study at microsoft,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mining Software Repositories . IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, May 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/characteristics-of-useful-code-reviews-an-empirical-study-at-microsoft/
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Dalianis, Evaluation Metrics and Evaluation . Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 45–53. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78503-5_6
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Ogura, S. Matsumoto, H. Hata, and S. Kusumoto, “Bring your own coding style,” in 25th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering, SANER 2018, Campobasso, Italy, March 20-23, 2018 , R. Oliveto, M. D. Penta, and D. C. Shepherd, Eds. IEEE Computer Society, 2018, pp. 527–531. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330253
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Dey, S. Mousavi, E. Ponce, T. Fry, B. Vasilescu, A. Filippova, and A. Mockus, “Detecting and characterizing bots that commit code,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories , ser. MSR ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 209–219. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3379597.3387478
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Feng, D. Guo, D. Tang, N. Duan, X. Feng, M. Gong, L. Shou, B. Qin, T. Liu, D. Jiang, and M. Zhou, “CodeBERT: A pre-trained model for programming and natural languages,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 . Online: Association for Computational Linguistics, Nov. 2020, pp. 1536–1547. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2020.findings-emnlp.139
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Morales, F. Khomh, and G. Antoniol, “RePOR: Mimicking humans on refactoring tasks. Are we there yet?” Empirical Software Engineering , vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2960–2996, Jul. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09826-7
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Reda, “GitHub Copilot is not infringing your copyright https://felixreda.eu/2021/07/github-copilot-is-not-infringing-your-copyright/ .”
2021
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Later among the works it cites.
J. Gu, P. Salza, and H. C. Gall, “Assemble Foundation Models for Automatic Code Summarization,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) , Mar. 2022, pp. 935–946, iSSN: 1534-5351. [Online]. Available: 10.1109/SANER53432.2022.00112
2022
Later among the works it cites.
D. Wang, Z. Jia, S. Li, Y. Yu, Y. Xiong, W. Dong, and X. Liao, “Bridging pre-trained models and downstream tasks for source code understanding,” in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Jul. 2022, pp. 287–298. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3510003.3510062
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
N. Cassee, C. Kitsanelis, E. Constantinou, and A. Serebrenik, “Human, bot or both? a study on the capabilities of classification models on mixed accounts,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME) , 2021, pp. 654–658. [Online]. Available: 10.1109/ICSME52107.2021.00075
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Golzadeh, A. Decan, E. Constantinou, and T. Mens, “Identifying bot activity in github pull request and issue comments,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM Third International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE) , 2021, pp. 21–25. [Online]. Available: 10.1109/BotSE52550.2021.00012
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Karmakar and R. Robbes, “What do pre-trained code models know about code?” in Proceedings of the 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering , ser. ASE ’21. Melbourne, Australia: IEEE Press, Jun. 2022, pp. 1332–1336. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ASE51524.2021.9678927
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Mastropaolo, S. Scalabrino, N. Cooper, D. Nader Palacio, D. Poshyvanyk, R. Oliveto, and G. Bavota, “Studying the usage of text-to-text transfer transformer to support code-related tasks,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) . Madrid, ES: IEEE, May 2021, pp. 336––347. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9401982/
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Paltenghi and M. Pradel, “Thinking like a developer? comparing the attention of humans with neural models of code,” in 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) , 2021, pp. 867–879
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
“ChatGPT https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt .”
Cited in the paper.
“GPTZero https://gptzero.me/ .”
Cited in the paper.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
C. Watson, N. Cooper, D. N. Palacio, K. Moran, and D. Poshyvanyk, “A systematic literature review on the use of deep learning in software engineering research,” ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. , vol. 31, no. 2, mar 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.univaq.idm.oclc.org/10.1145/3485275
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
A. Ahmad, M. Waseem, P. Liang, M. Fehmideh, M. S. Aktar, and T. Mikkonen, “Towards human-bot collaborative software architecting with chatgpt,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.14600
2023
Closest in time.
L. Avila-Chauvet, D. Mejía, and C. O. Acosta Quiroz, “Chatgpt as a Support Tool for Online Behavioral Task Programming,” Rochester, NY, Jan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4329020
2023
Closest in time.
J. Cao, M. Li, M. Wen, and S. chi Cheung, “A study on prompt design, advantages and limitations of chatgpt for deep learning program repair,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.08191
2023
Closest in time.
D. Sobania, M. Briesch, C. Hanna, and J. Petke, “An analysis of the automatic bug fixing performance of chatgpt,” 2023
2023
Closest in time.