Legal Syllogism Prompting: Teaching Large Language Models for Legal Judgment Prediction

The problems of jurisprudence

Richard A Posner. 1990 · 1990

Earlier work this paper cites.

The Use and Limits of Syllogistic Reasoning in Briefing Cases

Wilson Huhn. 2001 · 2001

Earlier work this paper cites.

A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States

Daniel Martin Katz, Michael J Bommarito, and Josh Blackman. 2017 · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis

Original

Bingfeng Luo, Yansong Feng, Jianbo Xu, Xiang Zhang, and Dongyan Zhao. 2017 · 2017

Earlier work this paper cites.

Judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: Looking into the crystal ball. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical legal studies . 24

Masha Medvedeva, Michel Vols, and Martijn Wieling. 2018 · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Cail2018: A large-scale legal dataset for judgment prediction

Original

Chaojun Xiao, Haoxi Zhong, Zhipeng Guo, Cunchao Tu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yansong Feng, Xianpei Han, Zhen Hu, Heng Wang, et al · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Overview of CAIL2018: Legal judgment prediction competition

Original

Haoxi Zhong, Chaojun Xiao, Zhipeng Guo, Cunchao Tu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yansong Feng, Xianpei Han, Zhen Hu, Heng Wang, et al · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

A brief history of the changing roles of case prediction in AI and law

Kevin D Ashley. 2019 · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future

Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, and Danushka Bollegala. 2020 · 2020

Earlier work this paper cites.

Explaining legal decisions using IRAC. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings , Vol. 2669. 74–83

Trevor Bench-Capon. 2020 · 2020

Cited alongside, same era.

LEGAL-BERT: The muppets straight out of law school

Original

Ilias Chalkidis, Manos Fergadiotis, Prodromos Malakasiotis, Nikolaos Aletras, and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2020 · 2020

Cited alongside, same era.

Explainable artificial intelligence, lawyer’s perspective. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law . 60–68

Łukasz Górski and Shashishekar Ramakrishna. 2021 · 2021

Cited alongside, same era.

Do Charge Prediction Models Learn Legal Theory?

Original

Zhenwei An, Quzhe Huang, Cong Jiang, Yansong Feng, and Dongyan Zhao. 2022 · 2022

Cited alongside, same era.

Legal Judgment Prediction: A Survey of the State of the Art. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-22 . 5461–5469

Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade

Giovanni Sartor, Michał Araszkiewicz, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Tom van Engers, Enrico Francesconi, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sileno, Frank Schilder, Adam Wyner, et al · 2022

Later among the works it cites.

Language models that seek for knowledge: Modular search & generation for dialogue and prompt completion

Original

Kurt Shuster, Mojtaba Komeili, Leonard Adolphs, Stephen Roller, Arthur Szlam, and Jason Weston. 2022 · 2022

Later among the works it cites.

Legal Prompt Engineering for Multilingual Legal Judgement Prediction

Original

Dietrich Trautmann, Alina Petrova, and Frank Schilder. 2022 · 2022

Later among the works it cites.

Emergent abilities of large language models

Original

Jason Wei, Yi Tay, Rishi Bommasani, Colin Raffel, Barret Zoph, Sebastian Borgeaud, Dani Yogatama, Maarten Bosma, Denny Zhou, Donald Metzler, et al · 2022

Later among the works it cites.