Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In this paper, we introduce the \textbf{C}hinese \textbf{AI} and \textbf{L}aw challenge dataset (CAIL2018), the first large-scale Chinese legal dataset for judgment prediction.
Predicting supreme court decisions mathematically: A quantitative analysis of the ”right to counsel” cases
Fred Kort. 1957 · 1957
Earlier work this paper cites.
Applying correlation analysis to case prediction
Stuart S Nagel. 1963 · 1963
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quantitative analysis of judicial processes: Some practical and theoretical applications
S Sidney Ulmer. 1963 · 1963
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mathematical models for legal prediction
R Keown. 1980 · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
Predicting supreme court cases probabilistically: The search and seizure cases, 1962-1981
Jeffrey A Segal. 1984 · 1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval
Gerard Salton and Christopher Buckley. 1988 · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Least squares support vector machine classifiers
Johan AK Suykens and Joos Vandewalle. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Exploring phrase-based classification of judicial documents for criminal charges in chinese
Chao-Lin Liu and Chwen-Dar Hsieh. 2006 · 2006
Cited alongside, same era.
The supreme court’s many median justices
Benjamin E Lauderdale and Tom S Clark. 2012 · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Exploiting machine learning models for chinese legal documents labeling, case classification, and sentencing prediction
Wan-Chen Lin, Tsung-Ting Kuo, Tung-Jia Chang, Chueh-An Yen, Chao-Ju Chen, and Shou-de Lin. 2012 · 2012
Cited alongside, same era.
Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality
Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013 · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification
Yoon Kim. 2014 · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Predicting judicial decisions of the european court of human rights: A natural language processing perspective
Nikolaos Aletras, Dimitrios Tsarapatsanis, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, and Vasileios Lampos. 2016 · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Thulac: An efficient lexical analyzer for chinese.
Maosong Sun, Xinxiong Chen, Kaixu Zhang, Zhipeng Guo, and Zhiyuan Liu. 2016 · 2016
Later among the works it cites.
Bag of tricks for efficient text classification
Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, Piotr Bojanowski, and Tomas Mikolov. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
A two-phase sentiment analysis approach for judgement prediction
Yi Hung Liu and Yen Liang Chen. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis
Bingfeng Luo, Yansong Feng, Jianbo Xu, Xiang Zhang, and Dongyan Zhao. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Exploring the use of text classi cation in the legal domain
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Document modeling with gated recurrent neural network for sentiment classification
Duyu Tang, Bing Qin, and Ting Liu. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Octavia Maria Sulea, Marcos Zampieri, Mihaela Vela, and Josef Van Genabith. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Few-shot charge prediction with discriminative legal attributes
Zikun Hu, Xiang Li, Cunchao Tu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2018 · 2018
Closest in time.