Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Interpreting the meaning of legal open-textured terms is a key task of legal professionals.
Waterman, D., Peterson, M.: Models of legal decision-making, r-2717-icj (1981)
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
MacCormick, D.N., Summers, R.S.: Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study. Routledge, Darmouth (1991)
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Paquin, L.C., Blanchard, F., Thomasset, C.: Loge–expert: from a legal expert system to an information system for non-lawyers. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. pp. 254–259 (1991)
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hart, H.L.: The Concept of Law. Clarendon Press, 2nd edn. (1994)
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
Endicott, T.: Vagueness in Law. Oxford University Press (2000)
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ashley, K.D., Rissland, E.L.: Law, learning and representation. Artificial Intelligence 150
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Daci, J.: Legal principles, legal values and legal norms: are they the same or different? Academicus International Scientific Journal 02
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Šavelka, J., Harašta, J.: Open texture in law, legal certainty and logical analysis of natural language. Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking pp. 159–171 (2015)
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Endicott, T.: Law and Language the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Šavelka, J., Ashley, K.D.: Extracting case law sentences for argumentation about the meaning of statutory terms. In: Proceedings of the third workshop on argument mining (ArgMining2016). pp. 50–59 (2016)
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Savelka, J., Walker, V.R., Grabmair, M., Ashley, K.D.: Sentence boundary detection in adjudicatory decisions in the united states. Traitement automatique des langues 58
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Savelka, J., Xu, H., Ashley, K.D.: Improving sentence retrieval from case law for statutory interpretation. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law. pp. 113–122 (2019)
2019
Earlier work this paper cites.
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al.: Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W.t., Rocktäschel, T., et al.: Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Asai, A., Yu, X., Kasai, J., Hajishirzi, H.: One question answering model for many languages with cross-lingual dense passage retrieval. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
2021
2022
Later among the works it cites.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
Katz, D.M., Bommarito, M.J., Gao, S., Arredondo, P.: Gpt-4 passes the bar exam. Available at SSRN 4389233 (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Šavelka, J., Ashley, K.D.: Discovering explanatory sentences in legal case decisions using pre-trained language models. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021. pp. 4273–4283 (2021)
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Šavelka, J., Ashley, K.D.: Legal information retrieval for understanding statutory terms. Artificial Intelligence and Law pp. 1–45 (2021)
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Salaün, O., Troussel, A., Longhais, S., Westermann, H., Langlais, P., Benyekhlef, K.: Conditional abstractive summarization of court decisions for laymen and insights from human evaluation. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 123–132. IOS Press (2022)
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Savelka, J., Ashley, K.D.: On the role of past treatment of terms from written laws in legal reasoning. New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic: From Ancient Law to Modern Legal Systems pp. 379–395 (2022)
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
OpenAI: Gpt-4 technical report (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
Schick, T., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Dessì, R., Raileanu, R., Lomeli, M., Zettlemoyer, L., Cancedda, N., Scialom, T.: Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
Tan, Jinzhe, H.W., Benyekhlef, K.: Chatgpt as an artificial lawyer? In: Proceedings of The First Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Access to Justice (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
Westermann, H., Benyekhlef, K.: Justicebot: A methodology for building augmented intelligence tools for laypeople to increase access to justice. In: Proceedings of ICAIL 2023 (2023)
2023
Closest in time.
Willison, S.: Think of language models like chatgpt as a “calculator for words” (Apr 2023), https://simonwillison.net/2023/Apr/2/calculator-for-words/
2023
Closest in time.