Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We evaluated the capability of a state-of-the-art generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) model to perform semantic annotation of short text snippets (one to few sentences) coming from legal documents of various types.
Language models are few-shot learners
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al · 1901
Earlier work this paper cites.
Random decision forests. In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition , Vol. 1. IEEE, 278–282
Tin Kam Ho. 1995 · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
LetSum, an Automatic Text Summarization system in Law field. JURIX 2004
Atefeh Farzindar and Guy Lapalme. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatic semantics extraction in law documents. In 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law . 133–140
Carlo Biagioli, Enrico Francesconi, Andrea Passerini, Simonetta Montemagni, and Claudia Soria. 2005 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Machine learning versus knowledge based classification of legal texts
Emile de Maat, Kai Krabben, and Radboud Winkels. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Integrating a bottom–up and top–down methodology for building semantic resources for the multilingual legal domain
Enrico Francesconi, Simonetta Montemagni, Wim Peters, and Daniela Tiscornia. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
On rule extraction from regulations
Adam Wyner and Wim Peters. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automatic Extraction of Legal Concepts and Definitions. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2012: the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference , Vol. 250. IOS Press, 157
Radboud Winkels and Rinke Hoekstra. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Network analysis of manually-encoded state laws and prospects for automation
Patricia M Sweeney, E Bjerke, MA Potter, H Guclu, CR Keane, KD Ashley, M Grabmair, and R Hwa. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mining information from statutory texts in multi-jurisdictional settings
Jaromír Šavelka, Matthias Grabmair, and Kevin D Ashley. 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Transfer of predictive models for classification of statutory texts in multi-jurisdictional settings. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law . 216–220
Jaromír Šavelka and Kevin D Ashley. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Applying an interactive machine learning approach to statutory analysis
Jaromír Šavelka, Gaurav Trivedi, and Kevin D Ashley. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Extracting contract elements. In Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law . 19–28
Ilias Chalkidis, Ion Androutsopoulos, and Achilleas Michos. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Using conditional random fields to detect different functional types of content in decisions of united states courts with example application to sentence boundary detection. In Workshop on Automated Semantic Analysis of Information in Legal Texts . 10
Jaromír Savelka and Kevin D Ashley. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sentence boundary detection in adjudicatory decisions in the united states
Jaromir Savelka, Vern R Walker, Matthias Grabmair, and Kevin D Ashley. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Semantic types for computational legal reasoning: propositional connectives and sentence roles in the veterans’ claims dataset. In Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law . 217–226
Vern R Walker, Ji Hae Han, Xiang Ni, and Kaneyasu Yoseda. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Segmenting US Court Decisions into Functional and Issue Specific Parts.. In JURIX 2018 . 111–120
Jaromir Savelka and Kevin D Ashley. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Identification of rhetorical roles of sentences in Indian legal judgments. In JURIX 2019 , Vol. 322. IOS Press, Madrid, Spain, 3
Paheli Bhattacharya, Shounak Paul, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Saptarshi Ghosh, and Adam Wyner. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Semi-supervised methods for explainable legal prediction. In ICAIL 2019 . 22–31
Sentence Embeddings and High-Speed Similarity Search for Fast Computer Assisted Annotation of Legal Documents. In JURIX 2020 , Vol. 334. IOS Press, 164
Hannes Westermann, Jaromír Šavelka, Vern R Walker, Kevin D Ashley, and Karim Benyekhlef. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Using Argument Mining for Legal Text Summarization. In JURIX 2020 , Vol. 334. IOS Press
Huihui Xu, Jaromír Šavelka, and Kevin D Ashley. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Neural contract element extraction revisited: Letters from sesame street
Ilias Chalkidis, Manos Fergadiotis, Prodromos Malakasiotis, and Ion Androutsopoulos. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Cuad: An expert-annotated nlp dataset for legal contract review. In 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems: Track on Datasets and Benchmarks
Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Anya Chen, and Spencer Ball. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Karl Branting, Brandy Weiss, Bradford Brown, Craig Pfeifer, A Chakraborty, Lisa Ferro, M Pfaff, and A Yeh. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic Segmentation of Czech Court Decisions into Multi-Paragraph Parts
Jakub Harašta, Jaromír Šavelka, František Kasl, and Jakub Míšek. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach
Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Automatic Classification of Rhetorical Roles for Sentences: Comparing Rule-Based Scripts with Machine Learning
Vern R Walker, Krishnan Pillaipakkamnatt, Alexandra M Davidson, Marysa Linares, and Domenick J Pesce. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Computer-Assisted Creation of Boolean Search Rules for Text Classification in the Legal Domain. In JURIX 2019 , Vol. 322. IOS Press, 123
Hannes Westermann, Jaromír Šavelka, Vern R Walker, Kevin D Ashley, and Karim Benyekhlef. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Performance in the Courtroom: Automated Processing and Visualization of Appeal Court Decisions in France. In Proceedings of the Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop
Paul Boniol, George Panagopoulos, Christos Xypolopoulos, Rajaa El Hamdani, David Restrepo Amariles, and Michalis Vazirgiannis. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A benchmark for lease contract review
Spyretta Leivaditi, Julien Rossi, and Evangelos Kanoulas. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Extracting Outcomes from Appellate Decisions in US State Courts. In JURIX 2020 . 133
Alina Petrova, John Armour, and Thomas Lukasiewicz. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Lex Rosetta: transfer of predictive models across languages, jurisdictions, and legal domains. In Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and law . 129–138
Jaromir Savelka, Hannes Westermann, Karim Benyekhlef, Charlotte S Alexander, Jayla C Grant, David Restrepo Amariles, Rajaa El Hamdani, Sébastien Meeùs, Aurore Troussel, Michał Araszkiewicz, et al · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Michael Bommarito and Daniel Martin Katz. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Gray, et al · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Legal Prompting: Teaching a Language Model to Think Like a Lawyer
Fangyi Yu, Lee Quartey, and Frank Schilder. 2022 · 2022
Later among the works it cites.
Can GPT-3 perform statutory reasoning?
Andrew Blair-Stanek, Nils Holzenberger, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Classification of Trademark Distinctiveness using OpenAI GPT 3.5 model
John Goodhue and Yolanda Wei. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Blind Judgement: Agent-Based Supreme Court Modelling With GPT
Sil Hamilton. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
Gpt-4 passes the bar exam
Daniel Martin Katz, Michael James Bommarito, Shang Gao, and Pablo Arredondo. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
How well do SOTA legal reasoning models support abductive reasoning?
Ha-Thanh Nguyen, Randy Goebel, Francesca Toni, Kostas Stathis, and Ken Satoh. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.
MAUD: An Expert-Annotated Legal NLP Dataset for Merger Agreement Understanding
Steven H Wang, Antoine Scardigli, Leonard Tang, Wei Chen, Dimitry Levkin, Anya Chen, Spencer Ball, Thomas Woodside, Oliver Zhang, and Dan Hendrycks. 2023 · 2023
Closest in time.