Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Entity Matching is the task of deciding if two entity descriptions refer to the same real-world entity.
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.D., et al.: Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Christophides, V., Efthymiou, V., Palpanas, T., Papadakis, G., Stefanidis, K.: An Overview of End-to-End Entity Resolution for Big Data. ACM Computing Surveys 53
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Li, Y., Li, J., Suhara, Y., Doan, A., Tan, W.C.: Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language Models. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 14
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Primpeli, A., Bizer, C.: Profiling Entity Matching Benchmark Tasks. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. pp. 3101–3108 (2020)
2020
Earlier work this paper cites.
Barlaug, N., Gulla, J.A.: Neural Networks for Entity Matching: A Survey. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 15
2021
Earlier work this paper cites.
2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Akbarian Rastaghi, M., Kamalloo, E., Rafiei, D.: Probing the Robustness of Pre-trained Language Models for Entity Matching. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. pp. 3786–3790 (2022)
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Liu, J., Shen, D., Zhang, Y., Dolan, B., Carin, L., et al.: What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3? In: Proceedings of Deep Learning Inside Out: The 3rd Workshop on Knowledge Extraction and Integration for Deep Learning Architectures. pp. 100–114. Association for Computational Linguistics (2022)
2022
Cited alongside, same era.
Narayan, A., Chami, I., Orr, L., Ré, C.: Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data? Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 16
2022
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., et al.: Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2022)
2022
Later among the works it cites.
Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., et al.: Pre-Train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACM Computing Surveys 55
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
2023
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Peeters, R., Bizer, C.: Supervised Contrastive Learning for Product Matching. In: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022. pp. 248–251 (2022)
2022
Cited alongside, same era.