ChatGPT-Crawler: Find out if ChatGPT really knows what it's talking about

Bleu: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation

Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu · 2002

Earlier work this paper cites.

ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries

Chin-Yew Lin · 2004

Earlier work this paper cites.

Interpreting bleu/nist scores: How much improvement do we need to have a better system?

Y. Zhang, Stephan Vogel, and Alexander H. Waibel · 2004

Earlier work this paper cites.

METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments

Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie · 2005

Earlier work this paper cites.

Meteor, M-BLEU and M-TER: Evaluation metrics for high-correlation with human rankings of machine translation output

Abhaya Agarwal and Alon Lavie · 2008

Earlier work this paper cites.

Coqa: A conversational question answering challenge, 2018

Siva Reddy, Danqi Chen, and Christopher D. Manning · 2018

Earlier work this paper cites.

Codah: An adversarially authored question-answer dataset for common sense, 2019

Michael Chen, Mike D’Arcy, Alisa Liu, Jared Fernandez, and Doug Downey · 2019

Earlier work this paper cites.

Dialfact: A benchmark for fact-checking in dialogue, 2021

Prakhar Gupta, Chien-Sheng Wu, Wenhao Liu, and Caiming Xiong · 2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

Faviq: Fact verification from information-seeking questions, 2021

Jungsoo Park, Sewon Min, Jaewoo Kang, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi · 2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

Bartscore: Evaluating generated text as text generation, 2021

Weizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, and Pengfei Liu · 2021

Earlier work this paper cites.

"i think this is the most disruptive technology": Exploring sentiments of chatgpt early adopters using twitter data, 2022

Mubin Ul Haque, Isuru Dharmadasa, Zarrin Tasnim Sworna, Roshan Namal Rajapakse, and Hussain Ahmad · 2022

Earlier work this paper cites.

What is ai chatbot phenomenon chatgpt and could it replace humans?, Dec 2022

2022

Cited alongside, same era.

Chatgpt: The end of online exam integrity?, 2022

Teo Susnjak · 2022

Cited alongside, same era.

Chatgpt makes medicine easy to swallow: An exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports, 2022

Katharina Jeblick, Balthasar Schachtner, Jakob Dexl, Andreas Mittermeier, Anna Theresa Stüber, Johanna Topalis, Tobias Weber, Philipp Wesp, Bastian Sabel, Jens Ricke, and Michael Ingrisch · 2022

Cited alongside, same era.

Uzh_clyp at semeval-2023 task 9: Head-first fine-tuning and chatgpt data generation for cross-lingual learning in tweet intimacy prediction, 2023

Andrianos Michail, Stefanos Konstantinou, and Simon Clematide · 2023

Cited alongside, same era.

Can chatgpt assess human personalities? a general evaluation framework, 2023

Haocong Rao, Cyril Leung, and Chunyan Miao · 2023

Cited alongside, same era.

Is chatgpt a general-purpose natural language processing task solver?, 2023

Chengwei Qin, Aston Zhang, Zhuosheng Zhang, Jiaao Chen, Michihiro Yasunaga, and Diyi Yang · 2023

Closest in time.

Regulating chatgpt and other large generative ai models, 2023

Philipp Hacker, Andreas Engel, and Marco Mauer · 2023

Closest in time.

ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords

Yiqiu Shen, Laura Heacock, Jonathan Elias, Keith D Hentel, Beatriu Reig, George Shih, and Linda Moy · 2023

Closest in time.

Exploring ai ethics of chatgpt: A diagnostic analysis, 2023

Terry Yue Zhuo, Yujin Huang, Chunyang Chen, and Zhenchang Xing · 2023

Closest in time.

Using chatgpt for human-computer interaction research: A primer, 03 2023

Wilbert Tabone and Joost de Winter · 2023

Closest in time.

Will chatgpt get you caught? rethinking of plagiarism detection, 2023

Mohammad Khalil and Erkan Er · 2023