Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Massive pre-trained language models have garnered attention and controversy due to their ability to generate human-like responses: attention due to their frequent indistinguishability from human-generated phraseology and narratives, and controversy due to the fact that their convincingly presented arguments and facts are frequently simply false.
A. M. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind , 433 (1950)
1950
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Reif, J. H. Larkin, and G. C. Brackett, Teaching general learning and problem-solving skills, American Journal of Physics 44
1976
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. T. Chi, P. J. Feltovich, and R. Glaser, Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices, Cognitive science 5
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Clement, Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics, American Journal of Physics 50
1982
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Leinhardt, O. Zaslavsky, and M. K. Stein, Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching, Review of Educational Research 60
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. V. Heuvelen, Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies, Am. J. Physics 59
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Hestenes, M. Wells, and G. Swackhamer, Force Concept Inventory, The Physics Teacher 30
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Reif, Millikan lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes, American Journal of Physics 63
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Hestenes and I. Halloun, Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory: A response to march 1995 critique by huffman and heller, The physics teacher 33
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. R. Hake, Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, Am. J. Phys. 66
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Scherer, P. Dubois, and B. Sherwood, Vpython: 3d interactive scientific graphics for students, Computing in Science & Engineering 2
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur, Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results, American Journal of Physics 69
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. M. Pascarella, The influence of web-based homework on quantitative problem-solving in a university physics class, in Proc. NARST Annual Meeting , Vol. 4 (2004) pp. 19–28
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. J. Dufresne and W. J. Gerace, Assessing-to-learn: Formative assessment in physics instruction, The Physics Teacher 42
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
M. T. Cox, Metacognition in computation: A selected research review, Artificial intelligence 169
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Bonham, Graphical response exercises for teaching physics, The Physics Teacher 45
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Kortemeyer, E. Kashy, W. Benenson, and W. Bauer, Experiences using the open-source learning content management and assessment system LON-CAPA in introductory physics courses, Am. J. Phys 76
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
E. F. Redish and D. Hammer, Reinventing college physics for biologists: Explicating an epistemological curriculum, American Journal of Physics 77
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Kortemeyer and A. F. Kortemeyer, The nature of collaborations on programming assignments in introductory physics courses: a case study, European Journal of Physics 39
2018
Later among the works it cites.
P. Jupyter, Jupyter notebooks, https://jupyter.org (retrieved August 2019)
2019
Later among the works it cites.
2019
Later among the works it cites.
C. Ruggieri, Students’ use and perception of textbooks and online resources in introductory physics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16
2020
Later among the works it cites.
T. H. Kung, M. Cheatham, A. Medinilla, ChatGPT, C. Sillos, L. De Leon, C. Elepano, M. Madriaga, R. Aggabao, G. Diaz-Candido, et al. , Performance of chatgpt on usmle: Potential for ai-assisted medical education using large language models, medRxiv , 2022 (2022)
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
J. T. Laverty and G. Kortemeyer, Function plot response: A scalable system for teaching kinematics graphs, Am. J. Phys. 80
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
S. F. Wolf, D. P. Dougherty, and G. Kortemeyer, Rigging the deck: Selecting good problems for expert-novice card-sorting experiments, Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 8
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Clark, Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning, Educational Psychology Review 24
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
J. M. Aiken, M. D. Caballero, S. S. Douglas, J. B. Burk, E. M. Scanlon, B. D. Thoms, and M. F. Schatz, Understanding student computational thinking with computational modeling, in AIP Conference Proceedings , Vol. 1513 (1) (AIP, 2013) pp. 46–49
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Kortemeyer, An empirical study of the effect of granting multiple tries for online homework, American Journal of Physics 83
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
J. M. Murre and J. Dros, Replication and analysis of Ebbinghaus’ forgetting curve, PloS one 10
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
E. Gönülateş and G. Kortemeyer, Modeling unproductive behavior in online homework in terms of latent student traits: An approach based on item response theory, Journal of Science Education and Technology 26
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2022
Later among the works it cites.
P. C. Hamerski, D. McPadden, M. D. Caballero, and P. W. Irving, Students’ perspectives on computational challenges in physics class, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18
2022
Later among the works it cites.
D. Hestenes, M. Wells, G. Swackhamer, I. Halloun, R. Hake, and E. Mosca, Force Concept Inventory, revision 1995, https://www.physport.org/assessments/assessment.cfm?A=FCI (accessed January 2023)
2023
Closest in time.
World-Wide Web Consortium, WCAG 2 overview, https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/ (accessed February 2023)
2023
Closest in time.
Samantha Murphy Kelly, ChatGPT passes exams from law and business schools, https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/26/tech/chatgpt-passes-exams/index.html (accessed January 2023)
2023
Closest in time.
ZeroGPT, ChatGPT detector by ZeroGPT: detect OpenAI text, https://www.zerogpt.com (accessed January 2023)
2023
Closest in time.
turnitin, Turnitin Corp., https://www.turnitin.com (accessed January 2023)
2023
Closest in time.
Chegg, Chegg, https://www.chegg.com (accessed January 2023)
2023
Closest in time.