Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
As input data distributions evolve, the predictive performance of machine learning models tends to deteriorate.
Continual learning in practice
Diethe, T., Borchert, T., Thereska, E., Balle, B., and Lawrence, N. (2019) · 1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2001) · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
True to the model or true to the data?
Chen, H., Janizek, J. D., Lundberg, S. M., and Lee, S. (2020) · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dataset shift in machine learning
Quiñonero-Candela, J., Sugiyama, M., Lawrence, N. D., and Schwaighofer, A. (2009) · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., et al. (2011) · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the decreasing power of kernel and distance based nonparametric hypothesis tests in high dimensions
Ramdas, A., Reddi, S. J., Póczos, B., Singh, A., and Wasserman, L. A. (2015) · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A baseline for detecting misclassified and out-of-distribution examples in neural networks
Hendrycks, D. and Gimpel, K. (2017) · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
Lundberg, S. M. and Lee, S. (2017) · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A survey of methods for explaining black box models
Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., and Pedreschi, D. (2018) · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
A simple unified framework for detecting out-of-distribution samples and adversarial attacks
Lee, K., Lee, K., Lee, H., and Shin, J. (2018) · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
The intuitive appeal of explainable machines
Selbst, A. D. and Barocas, S. (2018) · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Shapley, L. S. (1953) · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Explainable ai for trees: From local explanations to global understanding
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., and Lee, S.-I. (2019) · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Explaining explanations in AI
Mittelstadt, B. D., Russell, C., and Wachter, S. (2019) · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Interpretable Machine Learning
Molnar, C. (2019) · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Failing loudly: An empirical study of methods for detecting dataset shift
Rabanser, S., Günnemann, S., and Lipton, Z. C. (2019) · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
Do we really need deep learning models for time series forecasting?
Elsayed, S., Thyssens, D., Rashed, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L., and Jomaa, H. S. (2021) · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Exploring the limits of out-of-distribution detection
Fort, S., Ren, J., and Lakshminarayanan, B. (2021) · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Leveraging unlabeled data to predict out-of-distribution performance
Garg, S., Balakrishnan, S., Lipton, Z. C., Neyshabur, B., and Sedghi, H. (2021b) · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
On the importance of gradients for detecting distributional shifts in the wild
Huang, R., Geng, A., and Li, Y. (2021) · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Inferring concept drift without labeled data
Labs, C. F. (2021) · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Arrieta, A. B., Rodríguez, N. D., Ser, J. D., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., and Herrera, F. (2020) · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Asymmetric shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainability
Frye, C., Rowat, C., and Feige, I. (2020) · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
A unified view of label shift estimation
Garg, S., Wu, Y., Balakrishnan, S., and Lipton, Z. (2020) · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to shapley values
Aas, K., Jullum, M., and Løland, A. (2021) · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep neural networks and tabular data: A survey
Borisov, V., Leemann, T., Seßler, K., Haug, J., Pawelczyk, M., and Kasneci, G. (2021) · 2021
Cited alongside, same era.
Ratt: Leveraging unlabeled data to guarantee generalization
Garg, S., Balakrishnan, S., Kolter, Z., and Lipton, Z. (2021a)
Cited in the paper.
Park, C., Awadalla, A., Kohno, T., and Patel, S. N. (2021) · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Algorithms to estimate shapley value feature attributions
Chen, H., Covert, I. C., Lundberg, S. M., and Lee, S. (2022) · 2022
Closest in time.
Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?
Grinsztajn, L., Oyallon, E., and Varoquaux, G. (2022) · 2022
Closest in time.
Designing Machine Learning Systems: An Iterative Process for Production-Ready Applications
Huyen, C. (2022) · 2022
Closest in time.
Monitoring model deterioration with explainable uncertainty estimation via non-parametric bootstrap
Mougan, C. and Nielsen, D. S. (2022) · 2022
Closest in time.