Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Research in artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision-making is experiencing tremendous growth with a constantly rising number of studies evaluating the effect of AI with and without techniques from the field of explainable AI (XAI) on human decision-making performance.
Statistical methods for meta-analysis
Larry V Hedges and Ingram Olkin. 1985 · 1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
Rebecca DerSimonian and Nan Laird. 1986 · 1986
Earlier work this paper cites.
The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis
JA Eaden, KR Abrams, and JF Mayberry. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance
John D. Lee and Katrina A. See. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
State court processing statistics, 1990-2009: felony defendants in large urban counties
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2014 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems
Jan vom Brocke, Alexander Simons, Björn Niehaves, Kai Riemer, Ralf Plattfaut, and Anne Cleven. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
Michael Borenstein, Larry V Hedges, Julian PT Higgins, and Hannah R Rothstein. 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-Volume 1 . 309–319
Myle Ott, Yejin Choi, Claire Cardie, and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning attitudes and attributes from multi-aspect reviews. In 12th International Conference on Data Mining . 1020–1025
Julian McAuley, Jure Leskovec, and Dan Jurafsky. 2012 · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Negative deceptive opinion spam. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies . 497–501
Myle Ott, Claire Cardie, and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification
Kaiming He, X. Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge
Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan Krause, Sanjeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng Huang, Andrej Karpathy, Aditya Khosla, Michael Bernstein, et al · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ups and downs: modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web . 507–517
Ruining He and Julian McAuley. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis
Joanna IntHout, John PA Ioannidis, Maroeska M Rovers, and Jelle J Goeman. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?
Dan Jackson and Jack Bowden. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks
ProPublica. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
"Why should I trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 1135–1144
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
UCI machine learning repository
Dheeru Dua and Casey Graff. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
A brief history of Scopus: The world’s largest abstract and citation database of scientific literature
Michiel Schotten, Wim JN Meester, Susanne Steiginga, Cameron A Ross, et al · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
LSAT prep book study guide: quick study & practice test questions for the Law School Admissions council’s (LSAC) Law school admission test
LSAT Prep Books Team. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ex machina: personal attacks seen at scale. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web . 1391–1399
Ellery Wulczyn, Nithum Thain, and Lucas Dixon. 2017 · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)
Amina Adadi and Mohammed Berrada. 2018 · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Extractive adversarial networks: high-recall explanations for identifying personal attacks in social media posts. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Samuel Carton, Qiaozhu Mei, and Paul Resnick. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Do explanations make VQA models more predictable to a human?. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing . 1036–1042
Arjun Chandrasekaran, Viraj Prabhu, Deshraj Yadav, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, and Devi Parikh. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
AI robo-advisor with big data analytics for financial services. In International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining . 1027–1031
Min-Yuh Day, Tun-Kung Cheng, and Jheng-Gang Li. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Human decisions and machine predictions
Jon Kleinberg, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Jure Leskovec, Jens Ludwig, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
Scott Mayer McKinney, Marcin Sieniek, Varun Godbole, Jonathan Godwin, Natasha Antropova, Hutan Ashrafian, Trevor Back, Mary Chesus, Greg Corrado, Ara Darzi, Mozziyar Etemadi, Florencia Garcia-Vicente, Fiona J. Gilbert, Mark D. Halling-Brown, Demis Hassabis, Sunny Jansen, Alan Karthikesalingam, Christopher J. Kelly, Dominic King, Joseph R. Ledsam, David S. Melnick, Hormuz Mostofi, Lily H. Peng, Joshua Jay Reicher, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Richard Sidebottom, Mustafa Suleyman, Daniel Tse, Kenneth C. Young, Jeffrey De Fauw, and Shravya Shetty. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
An uncertainty-based human-in-the-loop system for industrial tool wear analysis. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases . 85–100
Alexander Treiss, Jannis Walk, and Niklas Kühl. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Deep neural networks improve radiologists’ performance in breast cancer screening
N. Wu, Jason Phang, Jungkyu Park, Yiqiu Shen, Zhe Huang, Masha Zorin, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Thibault Févry, Joe Katsnelson, Eric Kim, S. Wolfson, Ujas Parikh, Sushma Gaddam, L. Lin, Kara Ho, Joshua D. Weinstein, B. Reig, Yiming Gao, H. Toth, Kristine Pysarenko, A. Lewin, Jiyon Lee, Krystal Airola, E. Mema, Stephanie Chung, Esther Hwang, N. Samreen, S. Kim, L. Heacock, L. Moy, Kyunghyun Cho, and K. Geras. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Sequential explanations with mental model-based policies
Arnold Yeung, Shalmali Joshi, Joseph Jay Williams, and Frank Rudzicz. 2020 · 2020
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play
David Silver, Thomas Hubert, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Matthew Lai, Arthur Guez, Marc Lanctot, L. Sifre, Dharshan Kumaran, Thore Graepel, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Karen Simonyan, and Demis Hassabis. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Superhuman AI for multiplayer poker
Noam Brown and Tuomas Sandholm. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
The effects of example-based explanations in a machine learning interface. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 258–262
Carrie J Cai, Jonas Jongejan, and Jess Holbrook. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Bias in bios: a case study of semantic representation bias in a high-stakes setting. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 120–128
Maria De-Arteaga, Alexey Romanov, Hanna Wallach, Jennifer Chayes, Christian Borgs, Alexandra Chouldechova, Sahin Geyik, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, and Adam Tauman Kalai. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
The principles and limits of algorithm-in-the-loop decision making
Ben Green and Yiling Chen. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Julian PT Higgins, James Thomas, Jacqueline Chandler, Miranda Cumpston, Tianjing Li, Matthew J Page, and Vivian A Welch. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Let me explain: impact of personal and impersonal explanations on trust in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–12
Johannes Kunkel, Tim Donkers, Lisa Michael, Catalin-Mihai Barbu, and Jürgen Ziegler. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Later among the works it cites.
Effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in AI-assisted decision making. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 295–305
Yunfeng Zhang, Q Vera Liao, and Rachel KE Bellamy. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Does explainable artificial intelligence improve human decision-making?. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence . 6618–6626
Yasmeen Alufaisan, Laura R Marusich, Jonathan Z Bakdash, Yan Zhou, and Murat Kantarcioglu. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Does the whole exceed its parts? The effect of AI explanations on complementary team performance. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Daniel Weld. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Expl(AI)n it to me–explainable AI and information systems research
Kevin Bauer, Oliver Hinz, Wil van der Aalst, and Christof Weinhardt. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
To trust or to think: cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI in AI-assisted decision-making
Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Will humans-in-the-loop become borgs? Merits and pitfalls of working with AI
Andreas Fügener, Jörn Grahl, Alok Gupta, and Wolfgang Ketter. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Human-AI complementarity in hybrid intelligence systems: a structured literature review. In Proceedings of the 25th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems
Patrick Hemmer, Maximilian Schemmer, Michael Vössing, and Niklas Kühl. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Towards a science of human-AI decision making: a survey of empirical studies
Vivian Lai, Chacha Chen, Q Vera Liao, Alison Smith-Renner, and Chenhao Tan. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Understanding the effect of out-of-distribution examples and interactive explanations on human-AI decision making
Han Liu, Vivian Lai, and Chenhao Tan. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scores. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
Giang Nguyen, Daeyoung Kim, and Anh Nguyen. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
An explainable AI system for automated COVID-19 assessment and lesion categorization from CT-scans
Matteo Pennisi, Isaak Kavasidis, Concetto Spampinato, Vincenzo Schininà, Simone Palazzo, Francesco Rundo, Massimo Cristofaro, Paolo Campioni, Elisa Pianura, Federica Di Stefano, Ada Petrone, Fabrizio Albarello, Giuseppe Ippolito, Salvatore Cuzzocrea, and Sabrina Conoci. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Using explainable artificial intelligence to improve process quality: evidence from semiconductor manufacturing
Julian Senoner, Torbjørn H. Netland, and Stefan Feuerriegel. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
AI for in-line vehicle sequence controlling: development and evaluation of an adaptive machine learning artifact to predict sequence deviations in a mixed-model production line
Maximilian Stauder and Niklas Kühl. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Evaluating XAI: a comparison of rule-based and example-based explanations
Jasper van der Waa, Elisabeth Nieuwburg, Anita Cremers, and Mark Neerincx. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
On the effect of information asymmetry in human-AI teams
Patrick Hemmer, Max Schemmer, Niklas Kühl, Michael Vössing, and Gerhard Satzger. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
On the influence of explainable AI on automation bias. In Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Information Systems
Max Schemmer, Niklas Kühl, Carina Benz, and Gerhard Satzger. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
On the relationship between explanations, fairness perceptions, and decisions
Jakob Schöffer, Maria De-Arteaga, and Niklas Kuehl. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.
Designing transparency for effective human-AI collaboration
Michael Vössing, Niklas Kühl, Matteo Lind, and Gerhard Satzger. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.