Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Many important decisions in daily life are made with the help of advisors, e.g., decisions about medical treatments or financial investments.
Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment
Derek J Koehler. 1991 · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Does automation bias decision-making?
Linda J Skitka, Kathleen L Mosier, and Mark Burdick. 1999 · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation
Ilan Yaniv and Eli Kleinberger. 2000 · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system
Janet A Sniezek and Lyn M Van Swol. 2001 · 2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
The role of trust in automation reliance
Mary T Dzindolet, Scott A Peterson, Regina A Pomranky, Linda G Pierce, and Hall P Beck. 2003 · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance
John D Lee and Katrina A See. 2004 · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Aiding human reliance decision making using computational models of trust. In 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology-Workshops . 372–376
Peter-Paul Van Maanen, Tomas Klos, and Kees Van Dongen. 2007 · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Selecting methods for the analysis of reliance on automation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting , Vol. 52. 287–291
Lu Wang, Greg A Jamieson, and Justin G Hollands. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination
Myle Ott, Yejin Choi, Claire Cardie, and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Effect of descriptive information and experience on automation reliance
Nirit Yuviler-Gavish and Daniel Gopher. 2011 · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Negative deceptive opinion spam. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference of the north american chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies . 497–501
Myle Ott, Claire Cardie, and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
The role of explanations on trust and reliance in clinical decision support systems. In 2015 international conference on healthcare informatics . 160–169
Adrian Bussone, Simone Stumpf, and Dympna O’Sullivan. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err
Berkeley J Dietvorst, Joseph P Simmons, and Cade Massey. 2015 · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Effects of distance between initial estimates and advice on advice utilization
Thomas Schultze, Anne-Fernandine Rakotoarisoa, and Stefan Schulz-Hardt. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Do ‘big losses’ in judgmental adjustments to statistical forecasts affect experts’ behaviour?
Fotios Petropoulos, Robert Fildes, and Paul Goodwin. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Model-agnostic interpretability of machine learning
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Do explanations make VQA models more predictable to a human?. In EMNLP
Arjun Chandrasekaran, Viraj Prabhu, Deshraj Yadav, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, and Devi Parikh. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Metrics for explainable AI: Challenges and prospects
Robert R Hoffman, Shane T Mueller, Gary Klein, and Jordan Litman. 2018 · 2018
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
Scott Mayer McKinney, Marcin Sieniek, Varun Godbole, Jonathan Godwin, Natasha Antropova, Hutan Ashrafian, Trevor Back, Mary Chesus, Greg S Corrado, Ara Darzi, et al · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
No explainability without accountability: An empirical study of explanations and feedback in interactive ml. In Proceedings of the 2020 chi conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–13
Alison Smith-Renner, Ron Fan, Melissa Birchfield, Tongshuang Wu, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Daniel S Weld, and Leah Findlater. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
How do visual explanations foster end users’ appropriate trust in machine learning?. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 189–201
Fumeng Yang, Zhuanyi Huang, Jean Scholtz, and Dustin L Arendt. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in AI-assisted decision making. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency . 295–305
Yunfeng Zhang, Q Vera Liao, and Rachel KE Bellamy. 2020 · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Robo-advisory
Dominik Jung, Verena Dorner, Florian Glaser, and Stefan Morana. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Operator reliance on automation: Theory and data
Victor Riley. 2018 · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Do you comply with AI?—Personalized explanations of learning algorithms and their impact on employees’ compliance behavior
Niklas Kühl, Jodie Lobana, and Christian Meske. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
The effect of reliability information and risk on appropriate reliance in an autonomous robot teammate
Andrew Talone. 2019 · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Can AI help in screening viral and COVID-19 pneumonia?
Muhammad EH Chowdhury, Tawsifur Rahman, Amith Khandakar, Rashid Mazhar, Muhammad Abdul Kadir, Zaid Bin Mahbub, Khandakar Reajul Islam, Muhammad Salman Khan, Atif Iqbal, Nasser Al Emadi, et al · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Human evaluation of spoken vs. visual explanations for open-domain qa
Ana Valeria Gonzalez, Gagan Bansal, Angela Fan, Robin Jia, Yashar Mehdad, and Srinivasan Iyer. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
" Why is’ Chicago’deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humans. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13
Vivian Lai, Han Liu, and Chenhao Tan. 2020 · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Does the whole exceed its parts? the effect of ai explanations on complementary team performance. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Daniel Weld. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
To trust or to think: cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI in AI-assisted decision-making
Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Human-AI Complementarity in Hybrid Intelligence Systems: A Structured Literature Review
Patrick Hemmer, Max Schemmer, Michael Vössing, and Niklas Kühl. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studies
Vivian Lai, Chacha Chen, Q Vera Liao, Alison Smith-Renner, and Chenhao Tan. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Human Reliance on Machine Learning Models When Performance Feedback is Limited: Heuristics and Risks. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–16
Zhuoran Lu and Ming Yin. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Manipulating and measuring model interpretability. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–52
Forough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G Goldstein, Jake M Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Are explanations helpful? a comparative study of the effects of explanations in ai-assisted decision-making. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 318–328
Xinru Wang and Ming Yin. 2021 · 2021
Later among the works it cites.
Perceptions of Fairness and Trustworthiness Based on Explanations in Human vs. Automated Decision-Making
Jakob Schoeffer, Yvette Machowski, and Niklas Kühl. 2022 · 2022
Closest in time.