Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
We demonstrate how incorporating physics constraints into convolutional neural networks (CNNs) enables learning subgrid-scale (SGS) closures for stable and accurate large-eddy simulations (LES) in the small-data regime (i.e., when the availability of high-quality training data is limited).
J. Smagorinsky, General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment, Monthly Weather Review 91 (3) (1963) 99--164
1963
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. H. Kraichnan, Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence, The Physics of Fluids 10 (7) (1967) 1417–1423
1967
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. E. Leith, Diffusion approximation for two-dimensional turbulence, The Physics of Fluids 11 (3) (1968) 671–672
1968
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. K. Batchelor, Computation of the energy spectrum in homogeneous two-dimensional turbulence, The Physics of Fluids 12 (12) (1969) II–233
1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Leonard, Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows, in: Advances in geophysics, vol. 18, Elsevier, 237–248, 1975
1975
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. A. Clark, J. H. Ferziger, W. C. Reynolds, Evaluation of subgrid-scale models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow, Journal of fluid mechanics 91 (1) (1979) 1–16
1979
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Germano, U. Piomelli, P. Moin, W. H. Cabot, A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics 3 (7) (1991) 1760–1765
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. K. Lilly, A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics 4 (3) (1992) 633–635
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Zang, R. L. Street, J. R. Koseff, A dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model and its application to turbulent recirculating flows, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics 5 (12) (1993) 3186–3196
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
U. Achatz, G. Schmitz, On the closure problem in the reduction of complex atmospheric models by PIPs and EOFs: A comparison for the case of a two-layer model with zonally symmetric forcing, Journal of the atmospheric sciences 54 (20) (1997) 2452–2474
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Meneveau, J. Katz, Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 32 (1) (2000) 1–32
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows, IOP Publishing, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Bou-Zeid, C. Meneveau, M. Parlange, A scale-dependent Lagrangian dynamic model for large eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows, Physics of Fluids 17 (2) (2005) 025105
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Sagaut, Large eddy simulation for incompressible flows: An introduction, Springer Science & Business Media, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Berner, G. Shutts, M. Leutbecher, T. Palmer, A spectral stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme and its impact on flow-dependent predictability in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 66 (3) (2009) 603–626
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. R. Wilcox, Fundamentals of modern statistical methods: Substantially improving power and accuracy, Springer, 2010
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Sagaut, M. Terracol, S. Deck, Multiscale and multiresolution approaches in turbulence-LES, DES and Hybrid RANS/LES methods: Applications and Guidelines, World Scientific, 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Lu, F. Porté-Agel, A modulated gradient model for scalar transport in large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer, Physics of Fluids 25 (1) (2013) 015110
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. J. Chandler, R. R. Kerswell, Invariant recurrent solutions embedded in a turbulent two-dimensional Kolmogorov flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 722 (2013) 554–595
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Thuburn, J. Kent, N. Wood, Cascades, backscatter and conservation in numerical models of two-dimensional turbulence, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 140 (679) (2014) 626–638
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. A. Davidson, Turbulence: an introduction for scientists and engineers, Oxford university press, 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Vollant, G. Balarac, C. Corre, A dynamic regularized gradient model of the subgrid-scale stress tensor for large-eddy simulation, Physics of Fluids 28 (2) (2016) 025114
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Cohen, M. Welling, Group equivariant convolutional networks, in: International conference on machine learning, PMLR, 2990–2999, 2016
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Schneider, S. Lan, A. Stuart, J. Teixeira, Earth system modeling 2.0: A blueprint for models that learn from observations and targeted high-resolution simulations, Geophysical Research Letters 44 (24) (2017) 12–396
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
J.-X. Wang, J.-L. Wu, H. Xiao, Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data, Physical Review Fluids 2 (3) (2017) 034603
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
M. H. Silvis, R. A. Remmerswaal, R. Verstappen, Physical consistency of subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation of incompressible turbulent flows, Physics of Fluids 29 (1) (2017) 015105
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
J.-L. Wu, K. Kashinath, A. Albert, D. Chirila, H. Xiao, et al., Enforcing statistical constraints in generative adversarial networks for modeling chaotic dynamical systems, Journal of Computational Physics 406 (2020) 109209
2020
Later among the works it cites.
P. A. Perezhogin, 2D turbulence closures for the barotropic jet instability simulation, Russian Journal of Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling 35 (1) (2020) 21–35
2020
Later among the works it cites.
L. Zanna, T. Bolton, Deep Learning of Unresolved Turbulent Ocean Processes in Climate Models, Deep Learning for the Earth Sciences: A Comprehensive Approach to Remote Sensing, Climate Science, and Geosciences (2021) 298–306
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Yuan, Y. Wang, C. Xie, J. Wang, Dynamic iterative approximate deconvolution models for large-eddy simulation of turbulence, Physics of Fluids 33 (8) (2021) 085125
2021
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Wang, K. Luo, D. Li, J. Tan, J. Fan, Investigations of data-driven closure for subgrid-scale stress in large-eddy simulation, Physics of Fluids 30 (12) (2018) 125101
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
J.-C. Loiseau, S. L. Brunton, Constrained sparse Galerkin regression, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 838 (2018) 42–67
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Y. Wan, P. Vlachas, P. Koumoutsakos, T. Sapsis, Data-assisted reduced-order modeling of extreme events in complex dynamical systems, PLOS One 13 (5) (2018) e0197704
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
J.-L. Wu, H. Xiao, E. Paterson, Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework, Physical Review Fluids 3 (7) (2018) 074602
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Pan, K. Duraisamy, Long-time predictive modeling of nonlinear dynamical systems using neural networks, Complexity 2018
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
B. S. Veeling, J. Linmans, J. Winkens, T. Cohen, M. Welling, Rotation equivariant CNNs for digital pathology, in: International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, Springer, 210–218, 2018
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Zhou, G. He, S. Wang, G. Jin, Subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of isotropic turbulent flows using an artificial neural network, Computers & Fluids 195 (2019) 104319
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Beck, M. Kurz, A perspective on machine learning methods in turbulence modeling, GAMM-Mitteilungen 44 (1) (2021) e202100002
2021
Later among the works it cites.
K. Duraisamy, Perspectives on machine learning-augmented Reynolds-averaged and large eddy simulation models of turbulence, Physical Review Fluids 6 (5) (2021) 050504
2021
Later among the works it cites.
R. Stoffer, C. M. Van Leeuwen, D. Podareanu, V. Codreanu, M. A. Veerman, M. Janssens, O. K. Hartogensis, C. C. Van Heerwaarden, Development of a large-eddy simulation subgrid model based on artificial neural networks: a case study of turbulent channel flow, Geoscientific Model Development 14 (6) (2021) 3769–3788
2021
Later among the works it cites.
C. Jiang, R. Vinuesa, R. Chen, J. Mi, S. Laima, H. Li, An interpretable framework of data-driven turbulence modeling using deep neural networks, Physics of Fluids 33 (5) (2021) 055133
2021
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Tian, D. Livescu, M. Chertkov, Physics-informed machine learning of the Lagrangian dynamics of velocity gradient tensor, Physical Review Fluids 6 (9) (2021) 094607
2021
Later among the works it cites.
R. Maulik, H. Sharma, S. Patel, B. Lusch, E. Jennings, A turbulent eddy-viscosity surrogate modeling framework for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes simulations, Computers & Fluids 227 (2021) 104777
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. Subel, A. Chattopadhyay, Y. Guan, P. Hassanzadeh, Data-driven subgrid-scale modeling of forced Burgers turbulence using deep learning with generalization to higher Reynolds numbers via transfer learning, Physics of Fluids 33 (3) (2021) 031702
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. A. Kaptanoglu, K. D. Morgan, C. J. Hansen, S. L. Brunton, Physics-constrained, low-dimensional models for magnetohydrodynamics: First-principles and data-driven approaches, Physical Review E 104 (1) (2021) 015206
2021
Later among the works it cites.
M. Khodkar, P. Hassanzadeh, A data-driven, physics-informed framework for forecasting the spatiotemporal evolution of chaotic dynamics with nonlinearities modeled as exogenous forcings, Journal of Computational Physics 440 (2021) 110412
2021
Later among the works it cites.
K. Meidani, A. B. Farimani, Data-driven identification of 2D Partial Differential Equations using extracted physical features, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 381 (2021) 113831
2021
Later among the works it cites.
T. Beucler, M. Pritchard, S. Rasp, J. Ott, P. Baldi, P. Gentine, Enforcing analytic constraints in neural networks emulating physical systems, Physical Review Letters 126 (9) (2021) 098302
2021
Later among the works it cites.
K. Kashinath, M. Mustafa, A. Albert, J. Wu, C. Jiang, S. Esmaeilzadeh, K. Azizzadenesheli, R. Wang, A. Chattopadhyay, A. Singh, et al., Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 379 (2194) (2021) 20200093
2021
Later among the works it cites.
V. Balaji, Climbing down Charneys’s ladder: machine learning and the post-Dennard era of computational climate science, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 379 (2194) (2021) 20200085
2021
Later among the works it cites.
G. E. Karniadakis, I. G. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S. Wang, L. Yang, Physics-informed machine learning, Nature Reviews Physics 3 (6) (2021) 422–440
2021
Later among the works it cites.
H. Frezat, G. Balarac, J. Le Sommer, R. Fablet, R. Lguensat, Physical invariance in neural networks for subgrid-scale scalar flux modeling, Physical Review Fluids 6 (2) (2021) 024607
2021
Later among the works it cites.
A. Chattopadhyay, M. Mustafa, P. Hassanzadeh, E. Bach, K. Kashinath, Towards physically consistent data-driven weather forecasting: Integrating data assimilation with equivariance-preserving spatial transformers in a case study with ERA5, Geoscientific Model Development Discussions (2021) 1–23
2021
Later among the works it cites.
P. Perezhogin, A. Glazunov, A priori and a posteriori analysis in Large eddy simulation of the two-dimensional decaying turbulence using explicit filtering approach, in: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, EGU21–2382, 2021
2021
Later among the works it cites.
M. Kurz, A. Beck, A machine learning framework for LES closure terms, Electronic transactions on numerical analysis 56 (2022) 117–137
2022
Closest in time.
R. Maulik, V. Rao, J. Wang, G. Mengaldo, E. Constantinescu, B. Lusch, P. Balaprakash, I. Foster, R. Kotamarthi, AIEADA 1.0: Efficient high-dimensional variational data assimilation with machine-learned reduced-order models, Geoscientific Model Development Discussions (2022) 1–20
2022
Closest in time.