Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Protein-ligand interactions (PLIs) are fundamental to biochemical research and their identification is crucial for estimating biophysical and biochemical properties for rational therapeutic design.
Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R.; Leach, A.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible ligand docking. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society. 1997; pp 154–COMP
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
Venkatachalam, C. M.; Jiang, X.; Oldfield, T.; Waldman, M. LigandFit: a novel method for the shape-directed rapid docking of ligands to protein active sites. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Jain, A. N. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. Journal of medicinal chemistry 2003
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Friesner, R. A.; Banks, J.; Murphy, R.; Halgren, T.; Klicic, J. et al.(2004) Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem 47
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: Collection of binding affinities for protein- ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Yang, C.-Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2005
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Glen, R. C.; Bender, A.; Arnby, C. H.; Carlsson, L.; Boyer, S.; Smith, J. Circular fingerprints: flexible molecular descriptors with applications from physical chemistry to ADME. IDrugs 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Trott, O.; Olson, A. J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Vina, A. Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading Trott, Oleg; Olson, Arthur J. J. Comput. Chem 2010
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
Beierlein, F. R.; Michel, J.; Essex, J. W. A simple QM/MM approach for capturing polarization effects in protein- ligand binding free energy calculations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2011
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mysinger, M. M.; Carchia, M.; Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2012
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Zhao, H.; Caflisch, A. Discovery of ZAP70 inhibitors by high-throughput docking into a conformation of its kinase domain generated by molecular dynamics. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Smusz, S.; Kurczab, R.; Bojarski, A. J. The influence of the inactives subset generation on the performance of machine learning methods. Journal of Cheminformatics 2013
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sliwoski, G.; Kothiwale, S.; Meiler, J.; Lowe, E. W. Computational methods in drug discovery. Pharmacological Reviews 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ruiz-Carmona, S.; Alvarez-Garcia, D.; Foloppe, N.; Garmendia-Doval, A. B.; Juhos, S.; Schmidtke, P.; Barril, X.; Hubbard, R. E.; Morley, S. D. rDock: a fast, versatile and open source program for docking ligands to proteins and nucleic acids. PLoS computational biology 2014
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Allen, W. J.; Balius, T. E.; Mukherjee, S.; Brozell, S. R.; Moustakas, D. T.; Lang, P. T.; Case, D. A.; Kuntz, I. D.; Rizzo, R. C. DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance. Journal of computational chemistry 2015
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Duvenaud, D. K.; Maclaurin, D.; Iparraguirre, J.; Bombarell, R.; Hirzel, T.; Aspuru-Guzik, A.; Adams, R. P. Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2015
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Kearnes, S.; McCloskey, K.; Berndl, M.; Pande, V.; Riley, P. Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints. Journal of Computer-aided Molecular Design 2016
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Torng, W.; Altman, R. B. Graph convolutional neural networks for predicting drug-target interactions. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Lim, J.; Ryu, S.; Park, K.; Choe, Y. J.; Ham, J.; Kim, W. Y. Predicting drug–target interaction using a novel graph neural network with 3D structure-embedded graph representation. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Chen, L.; Cruz, A.; Ramsey, S.; Dickson, C. J.; Duca, J. S.; Hornak, V.; Koes, D. R.; Kurtzman, T. Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening. PloS One 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Li, S.; Wan, F.; Shu, H.; Jiang, T.; Zhao, D.; Zeng, J. MONN: a multi-objective neural network for predicting compound-protein interactions and affinities. Cell Systems 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Landrum, G. RDKit: Open-source cheminformatics. https://www.rdkit.org/. Q3 2016
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Wang, L.; Deng, Y.; Wu, Y.; Kim, B.; LeBard, D. N.; Wandschneider, D.; Beachy, M.; Friesner, R. A.; Abel, R. Accurate modeling of scaffold hopping transformations in drug discovery. Journal of chemical theory and computation 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Wen, M.; Zhang, Z.; Niu, S.; Sha, H.; Yang, R.; Yun, Y.; Lu, H. Deep-learning-based drug–target interaction prediction. Journal of Proteome Research 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Ragoza, M.; Hochuli, J.; Idrobo, E.; Sunseri, J.; Koes, D. R. Protein–ligand scoring with convolutional neural networks. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Monti, F.; Boscaini, D.; Masci, J.; Rodola, E.; Svoboda, J.; Bronstein, M. M. Geometric deep learning on graphs and manifolds using mixture model cnns. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2017; pp 5115–5124
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Zhong, F.; Xing, J.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Fu, Z.; Xiong, Z.; Lu, D.; Wu, X.; Zhao, J.; Tan, X., et al. Artificial intelligence in drug design. Science China Life Sciences 2018
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Meli, R. RMeli/PDBbind-docking: PDBbind19 Refined Docking (Version 0.1.0). 2020; https://github.com/RMeli/PDBbind-docking
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Zinc database, (http://zinc.docking.org/substances/subsets/fda/?page=1(30 August 2020, date last accessed)
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Chen, W.; Chen, G.; Zhao, L.; Chen, C. Y.-C. Predicting Drug–Target Interactions with Deep-Embedding Learning of Graphs and Sequences. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2021
2021
Closest in time.
Clyde, A.; Galanie, S.; Kneller, D. W.; Ma, H.; Babuji, Y.; Blaiszik, B.; Brace, A.; Brettin, T.; Chard, K.; Chard, R., et al. High Throughput Virtual Screening and Validation of a SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Non-Covalent Inhibitor. bioRxiv 2021
2021
Closest in time.
Boniolo, F.; Dorigatti, E.; Ohnmacht, A. J.; Saur, D.; Schubert, B.; Menden, M. P. Artificial intelligence in early drug discovery enabling precision medicine. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2021
2021
Closest in time.
Clyde, A.; Galanie, S.; Kneller, D. W.; Ma, H.; Babuji, Y.; Blaiszik, B.; Brace, A.; Brettin, T.; Chard, K.; Chard, R., et al. High Throughput Virtual Screening and Validation of a SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Non-Covalent Inhibitor. bioRxiv 2021
2021
Closest in time.
Lockbaum, G. J.; Reyes, A. C.; Lee, J. M.; Tilvawala, R.; Nalivaika, E. A.; Ali, A.; Kurt Yilmaz, N.; Thompson, P. R.; Schiffer, C. A. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease in complex with the non-covalent inhibitor ML188. Viruses 2021
2021
Closest in time.
Han, S. H.; Goins, C. M.; Arya, T.; Shin, W.-J.; Maw, J.; Hooper, A.; Sonawane, D. P.; Porter, M. R.; Bannister, B. E.; Crouch, R. D., et al. Structure-Based Optimization of ML300-Derived, Noncovalent Inhibitors Targeting the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 3CL Protease (SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021
2021
Closest in time.
Zhang, C.-H.; Stone, E. A.; Deshmukh, M.; Ippolito, J. A.; Ghahremanpour, M. M.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Spasov, K. A.; Zhang, S.; Takeo, Y.; Kudalkar, S. N., et al. Potent noncovalent inhibitors of the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 from molecular sculpting of the drug perampanel guided by free energy perturbation calculations. ACS central science 2021
2021
Closest in time.
Jones, D.; Kim, H.; Zhang, X.; Zemla, A.; Stevenson, G.; Bennett, W. D.; Kirshner, D.; Wong, S. E.; Lightstone, F. C.; Allen, J. E. Improved Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction with Structure-Based Deep Fusion Inference. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2021
2021
Closest in time.