Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Understanding protein sequences is vital and urgent for biology, healthcare, and medicine.
Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions
Gregory B Gloor, Louise C Martin, Lindi M Wahl, and Stanley D Dunn · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Modular protein engineering in emerging cancer therapies
Esther Vazquez, Neus Ferrer-Miralles, Ramon Mangues, Jose L Corchero, Simo Schwartz Jr, Antonio Villaverde, et al · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning generative models for protein fold families
Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Hetunandan Kamisetty, Jaime G Carbonell, Su-In Lee, and Christopher James Langmead · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families
Faruck Morcos, Andrea Pagnani, Bryan Lunt, Arianna Bertolino, Debora S Marks, Chris Sander, Riccardo Zecchina, José N Onuchic, Terence Hwa, and Martin Weigt · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics
Boris Reva, Yevgeniy Antipin, and Chris Sander · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments
David T Jones, Daniel WA Buchan, Domenico Cozzetto, and Massimiliano Pontil · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Optimization of affinity, specificity and function of designed influenza inhibitors using deep sequencing
Timothy A Whitehead, Aaron Chevalier, Yifan Song, Cyrille Dreyfus, Sarel J Fleishman, Cecilia De Mattos, Chris A Myers, Hetunandan Kamisetty, Patrick Blair, Ian A Wilson, et al · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models
Magnus Ekeberg, Cecilia Lövkvist, Yueheng Lan, Martin Weigt, and Erik Aurell · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue–residue contact predictions in a sequence-and structure-rich era
Hetunandan Kamisetty, Sergey Ovchinnikov, and David Baker · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
The fitness landscape of hiv-1 gag: advanced modeling approaches and validation of model predictions by in vitro testing
Jaclyn K Mann, John P Barton, Andrew L Ferguson, Saleha Omarjee, Bruce D Walker, Arup Chakraborty, and Thumbi Ndung’u · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations
Luciano G Martelotto, Charlotte KY Ng, Maria R De Filippo, Yan Zhang, Salvatore Piscuoglio, Raymond S Lim, Ronglai Shen, Larry Norton, Jorge S Reis-Filho, and Britta Weigelt · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
CCMpred—fast and precise prediction of protein residue–residue contacts from correlated mutations
Stefan Seemayer, Markus Gruber, and Johannes Söding · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Unexpected features of the dark proteome
Nelson Perdigão, Julian Heinrich, Christian Stolte, Kenneth S. Sabir, Michael J. Buckley, Bruce Tabor, Beth Signal, Brian S. Gloss, Christopher J. Hammang, Burkhard Rost, Andrea Schafferhans, and Seán I. O’Donoghue · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Evfold. org: Evolutionary couplings and protein 3d structure prediction
Robert Sheridan, Robert J Fieldhouse, Sikander Hayat, Yichao Sun, Yevgeniy Antipin, Li Yang, Thomas Hopf, Debora S Marks, and Chris Sander · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Quantifying and understanding the fitness effects of protein mutations: Laboratory versus nature
Jeffrey I Boucher, Daniel NA Bolon, and Dan S Tawfik · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Coevolutionary landscape inference and the context-dependence of mutations in beta-lactamase tem-1
Matteo Figliuzzi, Hervé Jacquier, Alexander Schug, Oliver Tenaillon, and Martin Weigt · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Mutation effects predicted from sequence co-variation
Thomas A Hopf, John B Ingraham, Frank J Poelwijk, Charlotta PI Schärfe, Michael Springer, Chris Sander, and Debora S Marks · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Deep generative models of genetic variation capture mutation effects
Adam J Riesselman, John B Ingraham, and Debora S Marks · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Accurate de novo prediction of protein contact map by ultra-deep learning model
Sheng Wang, Siqi Sun, Zhen Li, Renyu Zhang, and Jinbo Xu · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
How pairwise coevolutionary models capture the collective residue variability in proteins?
Matteo Figliuzzi, Pierre Barrat-Charlaix, and Martin Weigt · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
High precision in protein contact prediction using fully convolutional neural networks and minimal sequence features
David T Jones and Shaun M Kandathil · 2018
Single layers of attention suffice to predict protein contacts
Nicholas Bhattacharya, Neil Thomas, Roshan Rao, Justas Daupras, Peter Koo, David Baker, Yun S Song, and Sergey Ovchinnikov · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Learning mutational semantics
Brian Hie, Ellen Zhong, Bryan Bryson, and Bonnie Berger · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Self-supervised contrastive learning of protein representations by mutual information maximization
Amy X Lu, Haoran Zhang, Marzyeh Ghassemi, and Alan M Moses · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
ProGen: Language modeling for protein generation
Ali Madani, Bryan McCann, Nikhil Naik, Nitish Shirish Keskar, Namrata Anand, Raphael R Eguchi, Po-Ssu Huang, and Richard Socher · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Transforming the language of life: transformer neural networks for protein prediction tasks
Ananthan Nambiar, Maeve Heflin, Simon Liu, Sergei Maslov, Mark Hopkins, and Anna Ritz · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep contextualized word representations
Matthew E Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Improving language understanding by generative pre-training
Alec Radford, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, and Ilya Sutskever · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Unified rational protein engineering with sequence-based deep representation learning
Ethan C Alley, Grigory Khimulya, Surojit Biswas, Mohammed AlQuraishi, and George M Church · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Alphafold at casp13
Mohammed AlQuraishi · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning protein sequence embeddings using information from structure
Tristan Bepler and Bonnie Berger · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Uniprot: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge
UniProt Consortium · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
The pfam protein families database in 2019
Sara El-Gebali, Jaina Mistry, Alex Bateman, Sean R Eddy, Aurélien Luciani, Simon C Potter, Matloob Qureshi, Lorna J Richardson, Gustavo A Salazar, Alfredo Smart, et al · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Transformer protein language models are unsupervised structure learners
Roshan Rao, Sergey Ovchinnikov, Joshua Meier, Alexander Rives, and Tom Sercu · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning
Andrew W Senior, Richard Evans, John Jumper, James Kirkpatrick, Laurent Sifre, Tim Green, Chongli Qin, Augustin Žídek, Alexander WR Nelson, Alex Bridgland, et al · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
UDSMProt: universal deep sequence models for protein classification
Nils Strodthoff, Patrick Wagner, Markus Wenzel, and Wojciech Samek · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Profile prediction: An alignment-based pre-training task for protein sequence models
Pascal Sturmfels, Jesse Vig, Ali Madani, and Nazneen Fatema Rajani · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Bertology meets biology: Interpreting attention in protein language models
Jesse Vig, Ali Madani, Lav R Varshney, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, and Nazneen Fatema Rajani · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations
Jianyi Yang, Ivan Anishchenko, Hahnbeom Park, Zhenling Peng, Sergey Ovchinnikov, and David Baker · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
ProtTrans: Towards cracking the language of lifes code through self-supervised deep learning and high performance computing
A. Elnaggar, M. Heinzinger, C. Dallago, G. Rehawi, W. Yu, L. Jones, T. Gibbs, T. Feher, C. Angerer, M. Steinegger, D. Bhowmik, and B. Rost · 2021
Closest in time.
Combining evolutionary and assay-labelled data for protein fitness prediction
Chloe Hsu, Hunter Nisonoff, Clara Fannjiang, and Jennifer Listgarten · 2021
Closest in time.
Copulanet: Learning residue co-evolution directly from multiple sequence alignment for protein structure prediction
Fusong Ju, Jianwei Zhu, Bin Shao, Lupeng Kong, Tie-Yan Liu, Wei-Mou Zheng, and Dongbo Bu · 2021
Closest in time.
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold
John Jumper, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ronneberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Russ Bates, Augustin Žídek, Anna Potapenko, et al · 2021
Closest in time.
Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences
Alexander Rives, Joshua Meier, Tom Sercu, Siddharth Goyal, Zeming Lin, Jason Liu, Demi Guo, Myle Ott, C Lawrence Zitnick, Jerry Ma, et al · 2021
Closest in time.
Modeling protein using large-scale pretrain language model
Yijia Xiao, Jiezhong Qiu, Ziang Li, Chang-Yu Hsieh, and Jie Tang · 2021
Closest in time.