Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Recent work in cognitive reasoning and computer vision has engendered an increasing popularity for the Violation-of-Expectation (VoE) paradigm in synthetic datasets.
R. Baillargeon, E. S. Spelke, and S. Wasserman, “Object permanence in five-month-old infants,” Cognition , vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 191–208, 1985
1985
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Baillargeon, “Object permanence in 3 1 / 2 1/2 -and 4 1 / 2 1/2 -month-old infants.” Developmental psychology , vol. 23, no. 5, p. 655, 1987
1987
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Baillargeon, M. Graber, J. Devos, and J. Black, “Why do young infants fail to search for hidden objects?” Cognition , vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 255–284, 1990
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Baillargeon and J. DeVos, “Object permanence in young infants: Further evidence,” Child development , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1227–1246, 1991
1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Kahneman, A. Treisman, and B. J. Gibbs, “The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information,” Cognitive psychology , vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175–219, 1992
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. S. Spelke, K. Breinlinger, J. Macomber, and K. Jacobson, “Origins of knowledge.” Psychological review , vol. 99, no. 4, p. 605, 1992
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Baillargeon, A. Needham, and J. DeVos, “The development of young infants’ intuitions about support,” Early development and parenting , vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 69–78, 1992
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Kotovsky and R. Baillargeon, “Calibration-based reasoning about collision events in 11-month-old infants,” Cognition , vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 107–129, 1994
1994
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. S. Spelke, R. Kestenbaum, D. J. Simons, and D. Wein, “Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy,” British journal of developmental psychology , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 113–142, 1995
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Gergely, Z. Nádasdy, G. Csibra, and S. Bíró, “Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age,” Cognition , vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 165–193, 1995
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. D. Gordon and D. E. Irwin, “What’s in an object file? evidence from priming studies,” Perception & Psychophysics , vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1260–1277, 1996
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. L. Woodward, “Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach,” Cognition , vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 1998
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Kotovsky and R. Baillargeon, “The development of calibration-based reasoning about collision events in young infants,” Cognition , vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 311–351, 1998
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Aguiar and R. Baillargeon, “2.5-month-old infants’ reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded,” Cognitive psychology , vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 116–157, 1999
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Dan, T. Omori, and Y. Tomiyasu, “Development of infants’ intuitions about support relations: Sensitivity to stability,” Developmental Science , vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 2000
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. J. Hespos and R. Baillargeon, “Infants’ knowledge about occlusion and containment events: A surprising discrepancy,” Psychological Science , vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2001
2001
Cited alongside, same era.
S.-h. Wang, R. Baillargeon, and S. Paterson, “Detecting continuity violations in infancy: A new account and new evidence from covering and tube events,” Cognition , vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 129–173, 2005
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
E. S. Spelke and K. D. Kinzler, “Core knowledge,” Developmental science , vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2007
2007
Cited alongside, same era.
S. J. Hespos and R. Baillargeon, “Young infants’ actions reveal their developing knowledge of support variables: Converging evidence for violation-of-expectation findings,” Cognition , vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 304–316, 2008
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Baillargeon, J. Li, Y. Gertner, and D. Wu, “How do infants reason about physical events?” 2011
2018
Later among the works it cites.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
M. Stavans, Y. Lin, D. Wu, and R. Baillargeon, “Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy: A new model and predictions.” Psychological Review , vol. 126, no. 2, p. 196–225, 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
2019
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Adams, I. Arel, J. Bach, R. Coop, R. Furlan, B. Goertzel, J. S. Hall, A. Samsonovich, M. Scheutz, M. Schlesinger et al. , “Mapping the landscape of human-level artificial general intelligence,” AI magazine , vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 25–42, 2012
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
P. W. Battaglia, J. B. Hamrick, and J. B. Tenenbaum, “Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 110, no. 45, pp. 18 327–18 332, 2013
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Lerer, S. Gross, and R. Fergus, “Learning physical intuition of block towers by example,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2016, pp. 430–438
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
B. M. Lake, T. D. Ullman, J. B. Tenenbaum, and S. J. Gershman, “Building machines that learn and think like people,” Behavioral and brain sciences , vol. 40, 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Q. Wu, D. Teney, P. Wang, C. Shen, A. Dick, and A. van den Hengel, “Visual question answering: A survey of methods and datasets,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding , vol. 163, pp. 21–40, 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Mou and Y. Luo, “Is it a container? young infants’ understanding of containment events,” Infancy , vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 256–270, 2017
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Smith, L. Mei, S. Yao, J. Wu, E. Spelke, J. Tenenbaum, and T. Ullman, “Modeling expectation violation in intuitive physics with coarse probabilistic object representations,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 32, pp. 8985–8995, 2019
2019
Later among the works it cites.
T. D. Ullman and J. B. Tenenbaum, “Bayesian models of conceptual development: Learning as building models of the world,” Annual Review of Developmental Psychology , vol. 2, pp. 533–558, 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Lin, M. Stavans, and R. Baillargeon, “Infants’ physical reasoning and the cognitive architecture that supports it,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
K. Smith, L. Mei, S. Yao, J. Wu, E. S. Spelke, J. Tenenbaum, and T. D. Ullman, “The fine structure of surprise in intuitive physics: when, why, and how much?” in CogSci , 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
T. Shu, A. Bhandwaldar, C. Gan, K. Smith, S. Liu, D. Gutfreund, E. Spelke, J. Tenenbaum, and T. Ullman, “Agent: A benchmark for core psychological reasoning,” in Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning , vol. 139. PMLR, 2021, pp. 9614–9625
2021
Closest in time.