Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
The subjective Bayesian interpretation of quantum mechanics (QBism) and Rovelli's relational interpretation of quantum mechanics (RQM) are both notable for embracing the radical idea that measurement outcomes correspond to events whose occurrence (or not) is relative to an observer.
eprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02432[quant-ph]
B. C. Stacey, “Quantum Theory as Symmetry Broken by Vitality,” 2019 · 1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
eprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06240[quant-ph]
J. Bub, “Two dogmas’ redux,” 2019 · 1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
eprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.07386[quant-ph]
B. C. Stacey, “Ideas Abandoned en Route to QBism,” 2019 · 1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Bell, “Against Measurement,” Physics World
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Rovelli, “Relational Quantum Mechanics,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Laudisa, “The EPR argument in a relational interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Foundations of Physics Letters
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
Č. Brukner and A. Zeilinger, “Information and fundamental elements of the structure of quantum theory,” in Time, Quantum and Information
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Smerlak and C. Rovelli, “Relational EPR,” Foundations of Physics
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. J. Brown, “Relational Quantum Mechanics and the Determinacy Problem,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
eprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5209[quant-ph]
C. A. Fuchs, “QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism,” 2010 · 2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. C. van Fraassen, “Relational Quantum Mechanics: Rovelli’s world,” Discusiones Filosóficas
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Bub and I. Pitowsky, “Two dogmas about quantum mechanics,” in Many Worlds?: Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Harrigan and R. W. Spekkens, “Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states,” Foundations of Physics
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
eprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2141[quant-ph]
C. A. Fuchs, “Interview with a Quantum Bayesian,” in Elegance and Enigma: The Quantum Interviews · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. A. Fuchs and R. Schack, “Quantum-Bayesian coherence,” Rev. Mod. Phys
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. A. Fuchs, N. D. Mermin, and R. Schack, “An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics,” American Journal of Physics
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
eprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.8323[quant-ph]
P. Höhn, “Toolbox for reconstructing quantum theory from rules on information acquisition,” 2014 · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
eprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.04360[quant-ph]
C. A. Fuchs, “On Participatory Realism,” 2016 · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Dorato, “Rovelli’s Relational Quantum Mechanics, Anti-Monism, and Quantum Becoming,” in The Metaphysics of Relations
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
C. A. Fuchs, “Notwithstanding Bohr, the Reasons for QBism,” Mind and Matter
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Č. Brukner, “On the quantum measurement problem,” in Quantum [Un]Speakables II. The Frontiers Collection
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
P. A. Höhn and C. S. P. Wever, “Quantum theory from questions,” Phys. Rev. A
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Q. Ruyant, “Can we make sense of Relational Quantum Mechanics?,” Foundations of Physics
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Trassinelli, “Relational Quantum Mechanics and probability,” Foundations of Physics
P. Martin-Dussaud, C. Rovelli, and F. Zalamea, “The notion of locality in Relational Quantum Mechanics,” Foundations of Physics
2019
Later among the works it cites.
J. Pienaar, “Comment on “The notion of locality in Relational Quantum Mechanics”,” Foundations of Physics
2019
Later among the works it cites.
V. Baumann, F. Del Santo, and Č. Brukner, “Comment on Healey’s “quantum theory and the limits of objectivity”,” Foundations of Physics
2019
Later among the works it cites.
M. Proietti, A. Pickston, F. Graffitti, P. Barrow, D. Kundys, C. Branciard, M. Ringbauer, and A. Fedrizzi, “Experimental test of local observer independence,” Science Advances
2019
Later among the works it cites.
J. Pienaar, “Extending the Agent in QBism,” Foundations of Physics
2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Krismer, “Representation lost: The case for a relational interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Entropy
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
J. M. Yang, “A Relational Formulation of Quantum Mechanics,” Scientific Reports
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
C. Rovelli, “Space is blue and birds fly through it,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Č. Brukner, “A no-go theorem for observer-independent facts,” Entropy
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Frauchiger and R. Renner, “Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself,” Nature Communications
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Healey, “Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity,” Foundations of Physics
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
J. B. DeBrota, C. A. Fuchs, and R. Schack, “Respecting One’s Fellow: QBism’s Analysis of Wigner’s Friend,” Foundations of Physics
2020
Later among the works it cites.
C. Calosi and C. Mariani, “Quantum relational indeterminacy,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
2020
Later among the works it cites.
Č. Brukner, “Facts are relative,” Nature Physics
2020
Later among the works it cites.
M. P. Müller, “Law without law: from observer states to physics via algorithmic information theory,” Quantum
2020
Later among the works it cites.
K.-W. Bong, A. Utreras-Alarcón, F. Ghafari, Y.-C. Liang, N. Tischler, E. G. Cavalcanti, G. J. Pryde, and H. M. Wiseman, “A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox,” Nature Physics
2020
Later among the works it cites.
V. Baumann and Č. Brukner, “Wigner’s Friend as a Rational Agent,” in Quantum, Probability, Logic: The Work and Influence of Itamar Pitowsky
2020
Later among the works it cites.
J. B. DeBrota, C. A. Fuchs, J. L. Pienaar, and B. C. Stacey, “Born’s Rule as a Quantum Extension of Bayesian Coherence,” Phys. Rev. A
2021
Closest in time.
F. Laudisa and C. Rovelli, “Relational Quantum Mechanics,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
2021
Closest in time.
A. Oldofredi, “The Bundle Theory Approach to Relational Quantum Mechanics,” Foundations of physics
2021
Closest in time.
A. Di Biagio and C. Rovelli, “Stable facts, relative facts,” Foundations of Physics
2021
Closest in time.
eprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00670[quant-ph]
J. L. Pienaar, “A quintet of quandaries: five no-go theorems for Relational Quantum Mechanics,” 2021 · 2021
Closest in time.
E. G. Cavalcanti, “The view from a Wigner Bubble,” Foundations of Physics
2021
Closest in time.