Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, more than 500 US-based colleges and universities went "test-optional" for admissions and promised that they would not penalize applicants for not submitting test scores, part of a longer trend to rethink the role of testing in college admissions.
The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism
G. A. Akerlof · 1970
Earlier work this paper cites.
The theory of discrimination
K. Arrow · 1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
The statistical theory of racism and sexism
E. S. Phelps · 1972
Earlier work this paper cites.
A model of insurance markets with incomplete information
C. Wilson · 1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adverse selection in insurance markets: a selective survey
G. Dionne and N. Doherty · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
An economic argument for affirmative action
D. P. Foster and R. V. Vohra · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
School choice: A mechanism design approach
A. Abdulkadiroğlu and T. Sönmez · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
Making sat scores optional in selective college admissions: a case study
M. Robinson and J. Monks · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Method or madness? inside the us news & world report college rankings
R. G. Ehrenberg · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Defending standardized testing
R. Phelps · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Uneducated Guesses: Using Evidence to Uncover Misguided Education Policies
H. Wainer · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Defining promise: Optional standardized testing policies in american college and university admissions
W. C. Hiss and V. W. Franks · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
The test-optional movement at america’s selective liberal arts colleges: A boon for equity or something else?
A. S. Belasco, K. O. Rosinger, and J. C. Hearn · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
The enlightened college applicant: A new approach to the search and admissions process
A. Belasco and D. Bergman · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Strategic classification
M. Hardt, N. Megiddo, C. Papadimitriou, and M. Wootters · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Act for all: The effect of mandatory college entrance exams on postsecondary attainment and choice
J. Hyman · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Estimating Matriculation with a Focus on Financial Aid and Test Optional Policies: Data from a Liberal Arts Institution in the Northeast
H. Morgan · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Measuring success: Testing, grades, and the future of college admissions
J. Buckley, L. Letukas, and B. Wildavsky · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
An economic theory of differential treatment
E. Temnyalov · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
4 tips for international students planning to take sat or act
D. Cohen · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
The disparate effects of strategic manipulation
L. Hu, N. Immorlica, and J. W. Vaughan · 2019
Fair allocation through selective information acquisition
W. Cai, J. Gaebler, N. Garg, and S. Goel · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
On fair selection in the presence of implicit variance
V. Emelianov, N. Gast, K. P. Gummadi, and P. Loiseau · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Impact of bias on school admissions and targeted interventions
Y. Faenza, S. Gupta, and X. Zhang · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Standardized tests and affirmative action: The role of bias and variance
N. Garg, H. Li, and F. Monachou · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Maximizing welfare with incentive-aware evaluation mechanisms
N. Haghtalab, N. Immorlica, B. Lucier, and J. Wang · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Cited alongside, same era.
Access to population-level signaling as a source of inequality
N. Immorlica, K. Ligett, and J. Ziani · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Downstream effects of affirmative action
S. Kannan, A. Roth, and J. Ziani · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Simplicity creates inequity: Implications for fairness, stereotypes, and interpretability
J. Kleinberg and S. Mullainathan · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
The social cost of strategic classification
S. Milli, J. Miller, A. D. Dragan, and M. Hardt · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
From fair decision making to social equality
H. Mouzannar, M. I. Ohannessian, and N. Srebro · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Multiagent evaluation mechanisms
T. Alon, M. Dobson, A. Procaccia, I. Talgam-Cohen, and J. Tucker-Foltz · 2020
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Jaschik · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Classification with strategically withheld data
A. K. Krishnaswamy, H. Li, D. Rein, H. Zhang, and V. Conitzer · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Hiring as exploration
D. Li, L. R. Raymond, and P. Bergman · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
The disparate equilibria of algorithmic decision making when individuals invest rationally
L. T. Liu, A. Wilson, N. Haghtalab, A. T. Kalai, C. Borgs, and J. Chayes · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Report of the uc academic council standardized testing task force, Feb 2020
University of California Standardized Testing Task Force · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
UC makes landmark decision to drop ACT and SAT requirement for admission
T. Watanabe · 2020
Later among the works it cites.
Bridging machine learning and mechanism design towards algorithmic fairness
J. Finocchiaro, R. Maio, F. Monachou, G. K. Patro, M. Raghavan, A.-A. Stoica, and S. Tsirtsis · 2021
Closest in time.
Best vs. all: Equity and accuracy of standardized test score reporting
S. Kannan, M. Niu, A. Roth, and R. Vohra · 2021
Closest in time.
University of California will No Longer Consider SAT and ACT Scores
G. M. Nieto del Rio · 2021
Closest in time.