Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In robotic domains, learning and planning are complicated by continuous state spaces, continuous action spaces, and long task horizons.
S. Džeroski, L. De Raedt, and K. Driessens, “Relational reinforcement learning,” Machine learning , vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 7–52, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Hoffmann, “FF: The fast-forward planning system,” AI magazine , vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 57–57, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Bonet and H. Geffner, “Planning as heuristic search,” Artificial Intelligence , vol. 129, no. 1-2, pp. 5–33, 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Helmert, “The fast downward planning system,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , vol. 26, pp. 191–246, 2006
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Marthi, S. J. Russell, and J. A. Wolfe, “Angelic semantics for high-level actions.” in ICAPS , 2007, pp. 232–239
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. H. Zhuo, D. H. Hu, C. Hogg, Q. Yang, and H. Munoz-Avila, “Learning htn method preconditions and action models from partial observations,” in Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2009
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. Lang, M. Toussaint, and K. Kersting, “Exploration in relational domains for model-based reinforcement learning,” The Journal of Machine Learning Research , vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3725–3768, 2012
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Srivastava, E. Fang, L. Riano, R. Chitnis, S. Russell, and P. Abbeel, “Combined task and motion planning through an extensible planner-independent interface layer,” in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014 IEEE International Conference on . IEEE, 2014, pp. 639–646
2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Coumans and Y. Bai, “PyBullet, a python module for physics simulation for games, robotics and machine learning,” GitHub , 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. W. Battaglia, R. Pascanu, M. Lai, D. J. Rezende, and K. Kavukcuoglu, “Interaction networks for learning about objects, relations and physics,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2016
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Clevert, T. Unterthiner, and S. Hochreiter, “Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus),” in 4th International Conference on Learning Representations , 2016
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Konidaris, L. P. Kaelbling, and T. Lozano-Perez, “From skills to symbols: Learning symbolic representations for abstract high-level planning,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , vol. 61, pp. 215–289, 2018
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Arora, H. Fiorino, D. Pellier, M. Etivier, and S. Pesty, “A review of learning planning action models,” Knowledge Engineering Review , vol. 33, 2018
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
L. Illanes, X. Yan, R. T. Icarte, and S. A. McIlraith, “Symbolic plans as high-level instructions for reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling , vol. 30, 2020, pp. 540–550
2020
Later among the works it cites.
J. Loula, K. Allen, T. Silver, and J. Tenenbaum, “Learning constraint-based planning models from demonstrations,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
D. Lyu, F. Yang, B. Liu, and S. Gustafson, “SDRL: interpretable and data-efficient deep reinforcement learning leveraging symbolic planning,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 33, 2019, pp. 2970–2977
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
V. Xia, Z. Wang, K. Allen, T. Silver, and L. P. Kaelbling, “Learning sparse relational transition models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Asai, “Unsupervised grounding of plannable first-order logic representation from images,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling , vol. 29, 2019, pp. 583–591
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Bercher, R. Alford, and D. Höller, “A survey on hierarchical planning-one abstract idea, many concrete realizations.” in IJCAI , 2019, pp. 6267–6275
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
Z. Wang, C. R. Garrett, L. P. Kaelbling, and T. Lozano-Pérez, “Learning compositional models of robot skills for task and motion planning,” The International Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 40, no. 6-7, pp. 866–894, 2021
2021
Closest in time.
C. R. Garrett, R. Chitnis, R. Holladay, B. Kim, T. Silver, L. P. Kaelbling, and T. Lozano-Pérez, “Integrated task and motion planning,” Annual review of control, robotics, and autonomous systems , vol. 4, pp. 265–293, 2021
2021
Closest in time.
H. Kokel, A. Manoharan, S. Natarajan, R. Balaraman, and P. Tadepalli, “RePReL: Integrating relational planning and reinforcement learning for effective abstraction,” in Thirty First International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS) , 2021
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
T. Silver, R. Chitnis, A. Curtis, J. Tenenbaum, T. Lozano-Perez, and L. P. Kaelbling, “Planning with learned object importance in large problem instances using graph neural networks,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2021
2021
Closest in time.