Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Software language models have achieved promising results predicting code completion usages, and several industry studies have described successful IDE integrations.
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. C. Murphy, M. Kersten, and L. Findlater, “How are java software developers using the eclipse ide?” IEEE Softw. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 76–83, Jul. 2006. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MS.2006.105
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Bruch, M. Monperrus, and M. Mezini, “Learning from examples to improve code completion systems,” in Proceedings of the the 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on The Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. ESEC/FSE ’09. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2009, pp. 213–222. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1595696.1595728
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Hindle, E. T. Barr, Z. Su, M. Gabel, and P. Devanbu, “On the naturalness of software,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering , ser. ICSE ’12. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, 2012, pp. 837–847. [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2337223.2337322
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. T. Nguyen, A. T. Nguyen, H. A. Nguyen, and T. N. Nguyen, “A statistical semantic language model for source code,” in Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. ESEC/FSE 2013. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2013, p. 532–542. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2491411.2491458
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Bielik, V. Raychev, and M. Vechev, “Phog: Probabilistic model for code,” in Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 48 , ser. ICML’16. JMLR.org, 2016, p. 2933–2942
2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. J. Hellendoorn and P. Devanbu, “Are deep neural networks the best choice for modeling source code?” in Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering , ser. ESEC/FSE 2017. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017, p. 763–773. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3106237.3106290
2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Li, Y. Wang, M. R. Lyu, and I. King, “Code completion with neural attention and pointer networks,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Jul 2018. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/578
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
B. McCann, N. S. Keskar, C. Xiong, and R. Socher, “The natural language decathlon: Multitask learning as question answering,” 2018
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
V. J. Hellendoorn, S. Proksch, H. C. Gall, and A. Bacchelli, “When code completion fails: A case study on real-world completions,” ser. ICSE ’19. IEEE Press, 2019, p. 960–970. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2019.00101
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, and I. Sutskever, “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Allamanis, “The adverse effects of code duplication in machine learning models of code,” 2019
Z. Feng, D. Guo, D. Tang, N. Duan, X. Feng, M. Gong, L. Shou, B. Qin, T. Liu, D. Jiang, and M. Zhou, “Codebert: A pre-trained model for programming and natural languages,” 2020
2020
Later among the works it cites.
2020
Later among the works it cites.
W. U. Ahmad, S. Chakraborty, B. Ray, and K.-W. Chang, “Unified pre-training for program understanding and generation,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 2021
2021
Closest in time.
E. Mashhadi and H. Hemmati, “Applying codebert for automated program repair of java simple bugs,” 2021
2021
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
N. S. Keskar, B. McCann, L. R. Varshney, C. Xiong, and R. Socher, “Ctrl: A conditional transformer language model for controllable generation,” 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Liu, M. Ott, N. Goyal, J. Du, M. Joshi, D. Chen, O. Levy, M. Lewis, L. Zettlemoyer, and V. Stoyanov, “Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach,” 2019
2019
Cited alongside, same era.
G. A. Aye, S. Kim, and H. Li, “Learning autocompletion from real-world datasets,” 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
G. A. Aye and G. E. Kaiser, “Sequence model design for code completion in the modern ide,” 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Kim, J. Zhao, Y. Tian, and S. Chandra, “Code prediction by feeding trees to transformers,” 2020
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Lewis, Y. Liu, N. Goyal, M. Ghazvininejad, A. Mohamed, O. Levy, V. Stoyanov, and L. Zettlemoyer, “BART: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension,” in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics . Online: Association for Computational Linguistics, Jul. 2020, pp. 7871–7880. [Online]. Available: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.acl-main.703
2020
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Lin, Y. Liu, Q. Zeng, M. Jiang, and J. Cleland-Huang, “Traceability transformed: Generating more accurate links with pre-trained bert models,” 2021
2021
Closest in time.
T. Sharma, V. Efstathiou, P. Louridas, and D. Spinellis, “Code smell detection by deep direct-learning and transfer-learning,” Journal of Systems and Software , vol. 176, p. 110936, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121221000339
2021
Closest in time.
A. Mastropaolo, S. Scalabrino, N. Cooper, D. N. Palacio, D. Poshyvanyk, R. Oliveto, and G. Bavota, “Studying the usage of text-to-text transfer transformer to support code-related tasks,” 2021
2021
Closest in time.
K. Pei, Z. Xuan, J. Yang, S. Jana, and B. Ray, “Trex: Learning execution semantics from micro-traces for binary similarity,” 2021
2021
Closest in time.
A. Elnaggar, W. Ding, L. Jones, T. Gibbs, T. Feher, C. Angerer, S. Severini, F. Matthes, and B. Rost, “Codetrans: Towards cracking the language of silicone’s code through self-supervised deep learning and high performance computing,” 2021
2021
Closest in time.
S. Lu, D. Guo, S. Ren, J. Huang, A. Svyatkovskiy, A. Blanco, C. Clement, D. Drain, D. Jiang, D. Tang, G. Li, L. Zhou, L. Shou, L. Zhou, M. Tufano, M. Gong, M. Zhou, N. Duan, N. Sundaresan, S. K. Deng, S. Fu, and S. Liu, “Codexglue: A machine learning benchmark dataset for code understanding and generation,” 2021
2021
Closest in time.