Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
EIP-1559 is a proposal to make several tightly coupled additions to Ethereum's transaction fee mechanism, including variable-size blocks and a burned base fee that rises and falls with demand.
P. Daian, S. Goldfeder, T. Kell, Y. Li, X. Zhao, I. Bentov, L. Breidenbach, and A. Juels · 1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
Broken Metre: Attacking resource metering in EVM
D. Pérez and B. Livshits · 1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
Incentives and behavior in English, Dutch, and sealed-bid auctions
V. M. Coppinger, V. L. Smith, and J. A. Titus · 1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
Markets and computation: Agoric open systems
M. S. Miller and K. E. Drexler · 1988
Earlier work this paper cites.
Credible, truthful, and two-round (optimal) auctions via cryptographic commitments
M. V. X. Ferreira and S. M. Weinberg · 2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system
S. Nakamoto · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ethereum: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform
V. Buterin · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Information propagation in the Bitcoin network
C. Decker and R. Wattenhofer · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Feather-forks: enforcing a blacklist with sub-50% hash power
A. Miller · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
On transaction fees, and the fallacy of market-based solutions
V. Buterin · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
The economics of Bitcoin transaction fees
N. Houy · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
A transaction fee market exists without a block size limit
P. R. Rizun · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Why buy when you can rent?: Bribery attacks on Bitcoin-style consensus
J. Bonneau · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
On inflation, transaction fees and cryptocurrency monetary policy
V. Buterin · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the instability of Bitcoin without the block reward
M. Carlsten, H. A. Kalodner, S. M. Weinberg, and A. Narayanan · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Twenty Lectures on Algorithmic Game Theory
T. Roughgarden · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
An economic analysis of the Bitcoin payment system
G. Huberman, J. Leshno, and C. C. Moallemi · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
The challenges of Bitcoin transaction fee estimation
J. Lopp · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
An introduction to Bitcoin Core fee estimation
J. Newbery · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
The economic limits of Bitcoin and the blockchain
E. Budish · 2018
Earlier work this paper cites.
Blockchain resource pricing
V. Buterin · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
First and second-price auctions and improved transaction-fee markets
V. Buterin · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
An incentive analysis of some Bitcoin fee designs
A. C.-C. Yao · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
URL: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-1559-fee-market-change-for-eth-1-0-chain/2783 , March 2019
EIP-1559: Fee market change for ETH 1.0 chain · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Beyond the doomsday economics of “proof-ofwork” in cryptocurrencies
R. Auer · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Credible auctions: A trilemma
M. Akbarpour and S. Li · 2020
Closest in time.
EIP-1559 community outreach report
T. Beiko · 2020
Closest in time.
EIP-2593: Escalator fee market change for ETH 1.0 chain
D. Finlay · 2020
Closest in time.
Transaction fee economics in NEAR
Hasu · 2020
Closest in time.
Analysis of EIP-1559
Hasu and G. Konstantopoulos · 2020
Closest in time.
Analysis of EIP-2593 (escalator)
Hasu and G. Konstantopoulos · 2020
Closest in time.
A case study in miner extractable value
M. Honkasalo · 2020
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
S. Basu, D. Easley, M. O’Hara, and E. G. Sirer · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
From mining to markets: The evolution of bitcoin transaction fees
Easley, M. O’Hara, and S. Basu · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Pricing of mining ASIC and its implication to the high volatility of cryptocurrency prices
Y. Hashimoto and S. Noda · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
A model for Bitcoin’s security and the declining block subsidy
Hasu, J. Prestwich, and B. Curtis · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Redesigning Bitcoin’s fee market
R. Lavi, O. Sattath, and A. Zohar · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Blockchain fees are broken. Here are 3 proposals to fix them
H. Qureshi · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
Algorithms Illuminated, Part 3: Greedy Algorithms and Dynamic Programing
T. Roughgarden · 2019
Cited alongside, same era.
First time in Ethereum’s history, miners made more from fees than from block rewards
Y. Khatri · 2020
Closest in time.
Random ordering of equally-priced transactions incentivises competitive spam
livnev · 2020
Closest in time.
Ethereum Classic suffers third 51% attack in a month
F. Memoria · 2020
Closest in time.
EIP 1559: A transaction fee market proposal
B. Monnot · 2020
Closest in time.
The floating escalator: Combining 1559 and the escalator
B. Monnot · 2020
Closest in time.
Strategic users in EIP 1559
B. Monnot · 2020
Closest in time.
Double-spend counterattacks: Threat of retaliation in proof-of-work systems
D. J. Moroz, D. J. Aronoff, N. Narula, and D. C. Parkes · 2020
Closest in time.
Ethereum fee market reform: EIP-1559 as a question of fairness
Pintail · 2020
Closest in time.
Ethereum is a dark forest
D. Robinson and G. Konstantopoulos · 2020
Closest in time.
Ethereum: A secure decentalized generalised transaction ledger (Petersburg version)
G. Wood · 2020
Closest in time.
Correct cryptocurrency ASIC pricing: Are miners overpaying?
A. Yaish and A. Zohar · 2020
Closest in time.
EIP-1559 51% attacks: Should you live in fear?
M. Zoltu · 2020
Closest in time.