Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
In this paper, we explore the ability to model and infer personality types of opponents, predict their responses, and use this information to adapt a dialog agent's high-level strategy in negotiation tasks.
Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning
Volodymyr Mnih, Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, Mehdi Mirza, Alex Graves, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Tim Harley, David Silver, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. 2016 · 1937
Earlier work this paper cites.
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
David Premack and Guy Woodruff. 1978 · 1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
Intention in the structure of action and interaction
Jerome S Bruner. 1981 · 1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception
Heinz Wimmer and Josef Perner. 1983 · 1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
RMM: A recursive mental model for dialog navigation
Homero Roman Roman, Yonatan Bisk, Jesse Thomason, Asli Çelikyilmaz, and Jianfeng Gao. 2020 · 2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
User simulation for spoken dialogue systems: learning and evaluation
Kallirroi Georgila, James Henderson, and Oliver Lemon. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Cluster-based user simulations for learning dialogue strategies
Verena Rieser and Oliver Lemon. 2006 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning to refer informatively by amortizing pragmatic reasoning
Julia White, Jesse Mu, and Noah D. Goodman. 2020 · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Multi-party, multi-issue, multi-strategy negotiation for multi-modal virtual agents
David Traum, Stacy C Marsella, Jonathan Gratch, Jina Lee, and Arno Hartholt. 2008 · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Arguing using opponent models
Nir Oren and Timothy J Norman. 2009 · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Knowledge and implicature: Modeling language understanding as social cognition
Noah D Goodman and Andreas Stuhlmüller. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Opponent modelling in persuasion dialogues
Christos Hadjinikolis, Yiannis Siantos, Sanjay Modgil, Elizabeth Black, and Peter McBurney. 2013 · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Opponent models with uncertainty for strategic argumentation
Tjitze Rienstra, Matthias Thimm, and Nir Oren. 2013 · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Pomdp-based statistical spoken dialog systems: A review
Steve J. Young, Milica Gasic, Blaise Thomson, and Jason D. Williams. 2013 · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Learning in the rational speech acts model
Will Monroe and Christopher Potts. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Fast and easy language understanding for dialog systems with microsoft language understanding intelligent service (LUIS)
Jason D. Williams, Eslam Kamal, Mokhtar Ashour, Hani Amr, Jessica Miller, and Geoffrey Zweig. 2015 · 2015
Cited alongside, same era.
Reasoning about pragmatics with neural listeners and speakers
Jacob Andreas and Dan Klein. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
The minds of many: Opponent modeling in a stochastic game
Friedrich Burkhard von der Osten, Michael Kirley, and Tim Miller. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
A network-based end-to-end trainable task-oriented dialogue system
Tsung-Hsien Wen, David Vandyke, Nikola Mrksic, Milica Gasic, Lina Maria Rojas-Barahona, Pei-Hao Su, Stefan Ultes, and Steve J. Young. 2017 · 2017
Later among the works it cites.
Speaker-follower models for vision-and-language navigation
Daniel Fried, Ronghang Hu, Volkan Cirik, Anna Rohrbach, Jacob Andreas, Louis-Philippe Morency, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Kate Saenko, Dan Klein, and Trevor Darrell. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Decoupling strategy and generation in negotiation dialogues
He He, Derek Chen, Anusha Balakrishnan, and Percy Liang. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Answerer in questioner’s mind: information theoretic approach to goal-oriented visual dialog
Sang-Woo Lee, Yu-Jung Heo, and Byoung-Tak Zhang. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference
Noah D Goodman and Michael C Frank. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Opponent modeling in deep reinforcement learning
He He and Jordan L. Boyd-Graber. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Value iteration networks
Aviv Tamar, Sergey Levine, Pieter Abbeel, Yi Wu, and Garrett Thomas. 2016 · 2016
Cited alongside, same era.
It takes two to tango: Towards theory of ai’s mind
Arjun Chandrasekaran, Deshraj Yadav, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, Viraj Prabhu, and Devi Parikh. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Towards end-to-end reinforcement learning of dialogue agents for information access
Bhuwan Dhingra, Lihong Li, Xiujun Li, Jianfeng Gao, Yun-Nung Chen, Faisal Ahmed, and Li Deng. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Evaluating persuasion strategies and deep reinforcement learning methods for negotiation dialogue agents
Simon Keizer, Markus Guhe, Heriberto Cuayáhuitl, Ioannis Efstathiou, Klaus-Peter Engelbrecht, Mihai Sorin Dobre, Alex Lascarides, and Oliver Lemon. 2017 · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Machine theory of mind
Neil C. Rabinowitz, Frank Perbet, H. Francis Song, Chiyuan Zhang, S. M. Ali Eslami, and Matthew Botvinick. 2018 · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Pragmatically informative text generation
Sheng Shen, Daniel Fried, Jacob Andreas, and Dan Klein. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Persuasion for good: Towards a personalized persuasive dialogue system for social good
Xuewei Wang, Weiyan Shi, Richard Kim, Yoojung Oh, Sijia Yang, Jingwen Zhang, and Zhou Yu. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Probabilistic recursive reasoning for multi-agent reinforcement learning
Ying Wen, Yaodong Yang, Rui Luo, Jun Wang, and Wei Pan. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
A dynamic strategy coach for effective negotiation
Yiheng Zhou, He He, Alan W. Black, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2019 · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Bayes-adaptive monte-carlo planning and learning for goal-oriented dialogues
Youngsoo Jang, Jongmin Lee, and Kee-Eung Kim. 2020 · 2020
Closest in time.