Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Molecular-orbital-based machine learning (MOB-ML) provides a general framework for the prediction of accurate correlation energies at the cost of obtaining molecular orbitals.
R. K. Nesbet, “Brueckner’s Theory and the Method of Superposition of Configurations,” Phys. Rev. 109
1958
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. F. Boys, “Construction of Some Molecular Orbitals to Be Approximately Invariant for Changes from One Molecule to Another,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 32
1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. M. Foster and S. F. Boys, “Canonical Configurational Interaction Procedure,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 32
1960
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. J. Bartlett, “Many-Body Perturbation Theory and Coupled Cluster Theory for Electron Correlation in Molecules,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 32
1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Kapuy, Z. Csépes, and C. Kozmutza, “Application of the many-body perturbation theory by using localized orbitals,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. 23
1983
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. H. Dunning, “Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen,” J. Chem. Phys. 90
1989
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. E. Scuseria and T. J. Lee, “Comparison of coupled-cluster methods which include the effects of connected triple excitations,” J. Chem. Phys. 93
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Szabo and N. S. Ostlund, Modern Quantum Chemistry (Dover, Mineola, 1996) pp. 261–265
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Hampel and H. J. Werner, “Local treatment of electron correlation in coupled cluster theory,” J. Chem. Phys. 104
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Schütz and H.-J. Werner, “Local perturbative triples correction (t) with linear cost scaling,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 218
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Weigend, “A fully direct RI-HF algorithm: Implementation, optimised auxiliary basis sets, demonstration of accuracy and efficiency,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
H.-J. Werner, F. R. Manby, and P. J. Knowles, “Fast linear scaling second-order møller-plesset perturbation theory (mp2) using local and density fitting approximations,” J. Chem. Phys. 118
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Weigend and R. Ahlrichs, “Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence andquadruple zeta valence quality for h to rn: Design and assessmentof accuracy,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian processes for machine learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006) publication Title: Gaussian processes for machine learning
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Weigend, “Accurate coulomb-fitting basis sets for h to rn,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. C. Blum and J.-L. Reymond, “970 Million Druglike Small Molecules for Virtual Screening in the Chemical Universe Database GDB-13,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. P. Bartók, M. C. Payne, R. Kondor, and G. Csányi, “Gaussian Approximation Potentials: The Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics, without the Electrons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
2010
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay, “Scikit-learn: machine learning in python (v0.21.2),” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Rupp, A. Tkatchenko, K.-R. Müller, and O. A. von Lilienfeld, “Fast and Accurate Modeling of Molecular Atomization Energies with Machine Learning,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
GPy, GPy: A Gaussian process framework in python (2012)
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Hansen, G. Montavon, F. Biegler, S. Fazli, M. Rupp, M. Scheffler, O. A. von Lilienfeld, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. Müller, “Assessment and validation of machine learning methods for predicting molecular atomization energies,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Knizia, “Intrinsic atomic orbitals: an unbiased bridge between quantum theory and chemical concepts,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
T. Weymuth, E. P. A. Couzijn, P. Chen, and M. Reiher, “New Benchmark Set of Transition-Metal Coordination Reactions for the Assessment of Density Functionals,” J. Chem. Theory ut. 10
M. Welborn, L. Cheng, and T. F. Miller III, “Transferability in Machine Learning for Electronic Structure via the Molecular Orbital Basis,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14
2018
Later among the works it cites.
Z. Wu, B. Ramsundar, E. N. Feinberg, J. Gomes, C. Geniesse, A. S. Pappu, K. Leswing, and V. Pande, “MoleculeNet: a benchmark for molecular machine learning,” Chem. Sci. 9
2018
Later among the works it cites.
K. Yao, J. E. Herr, D. W. Toth, R. Mckintyre, and J. Parkhill, “The TensorMol-0.1 model chemistry: a neural network augmented with long-range physics,” Chem. Sci. 9
2018
Later among the works it cites.
H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, G. Knizia, F. R. Manby, M. Schütz, and others, MOLPRO, version 2018.3, a package of ab initio programs (Cardiff, UK, 2018)
2018
Later among the works it cites.
T. Husch, L. Freitag, and M. Reiher, “Calculation of Ligand Dissociation Energies in Large Transition-Metal Complexes,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Ramakrishnan, P. O. Dral, M. Rupp, and O. A. von Lilienfeld, “Big Data Meets Quantum Chemistry Approximations: The δ \delta -Machine Learning Approach,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
J.-L. Reymond, “The chemical space project,” Acc. Chem. Res. 48
2015
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Behler, “Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations,” J. Chem. Phys. 145
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Grimme, A. Hansen, J. G. Brandenburg, and C. Bannwarth, “Dispersion-corrected mean-field electronic structure methods,” Chem. Rev. 116
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Brockherde, L. Vogt, L. Li, M. E. Tuckerman, K. Burke, and K.-R. Müller, “Bypassing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning,” Nat. Comm. 8
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
K. Schütt, P.-J. Kindermans, H. E. Sauceda, S. Chmiela, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. Müller, “SchNet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , edited by I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017) pp. 991–1001
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
J. S. Smith, O. Isayev, and A. E. Roitberg, “ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost,” Chem. Sci. 8
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Later among the works it cites.
A. S. Christensen, F. A. Faber, and O. A. von Lilienfeld, “Operators in quantum machine learning: Response properties in chemical space,” J. Chem. Phys. 150
2019
Later among the works it cites.
A. Grisafi, A. Fabrizio, B. Meyer, D. M. Wilkins, C. Corminboeuf, and M. Ceriotti, “Transferable Machine-Learning Model of the Electron Density,” ACS Cent. Sci. 5
2019
Later among the works it cites.
J. S. Smith, B. T. Nebgen, R. Zubatyuk, N. Lubbers, C. Devereux, K. Barros, S. Tretiak, O. Isayev, and A. E. Roitberg, “Approaching coupled cluster accuracy with a general-purpose neural network potential through transfer learning,” Nat. Commun. 10
2019
Later among the works it cites.
O. T. Unke and M. Meuwly, “PhysNet: A Neural Network for Predicting Energies, Forces, Dipole Moments and Partial Charges,” J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15
2019
Later among the works it cites.
F. R. Manby, T. F. Miller III, P. Bygrave, F. Ding, T. Dresselhaus, F. Batista-Romero, A. Buccheri, C. Bungey, S. J. R. Lee, R. Meli, K. Miyamoto, C. Steinmann, T. Tsuchiya, M. Welborn, T. Wiles, and Z. Williams, “entos: A Quantum Molecular Simulation Package,” (2019), 10.26434/chemrxiv.7762646.v2
2019
Later among the works it cites.
A. Fabrizio, B. Meyer, and C. Corminboeuf, “Machine learning models of the energy curvature vs particle number for optimal tuning of long-range corrected functionals,” J. Chem. Phys. 152
2020
Closest in time.
Y. Chen, L. Zhang, H. Wang, and W. E, “Ground state energy functional with Hartree-Fock efficiency and chemical accuracy,” J. Phys. Chem. A 124
2020
Closest in time.
A. S. Christensen, L. A. Bratholm, F. A. Faber, and O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, “FCHL revisited: Faster and more accurate quantum machine learning,” J. Chem. Phys. 152
2020
Closest in time.
S. Dick and M. Fernandez-Serra, “Machine learning accurate exchange and correlation functionals of the electronic density,” Nat. Comm. 11
2020
Closest in time.
Z. Liu, L. Lin, Q. Jia, Z. Cheng, Y. Jiang, Y. Guo, and J. Ma, “Transferable Multi-level Attention Neural Network for Accurate Prediction of Quantum Chemistry Properties via Multi-task Learning,” (2020), 10.26434/chemrxiv.12588170.v1
2020
Closest in time.
2020
Closest in time.
S. Manzhos, “Machine learning for the solution of the Schrödinger equation,” Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 1
2020
Closest in time.
A. Shapeev, K. Gubaev, E. Tsymbalov, and E. Podryabinkin, “Active learning and uncertainty estimation,” in Machine Learning Meets Quantum Physics , edited by K. T. Schütt, S. Chmiela, O. A. von Lilienfeld, A. Tkatchenko, K. Tsuda, and K.-R. Müller (Springer Nature Switzerland AG., 2020) pp. 309–329
2020
Closest in time.
L. Hirschfeld, K. Swanson, K. Yang, R. Barzilay, and C. W. Coley, “Uncertainty Quantification Using Neural Networks for Molecular Property Prediction,” J. Chem. Inf. Model 60
2020
Closest in time.