Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Parameterized quantum circuits are a promising technology for achieving a quantum advantage.
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Wiesner, Simulations of many-body quantum systems by a quantum computer (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9603028 [quant-ph]
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science 273
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations (3rd Ed.) (Johns Hopkins University Press, USA, 1996)
1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. S. Abrams and S. Lloyd, Simulation of many-body fermi systems on a universal quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Zalka, Simulating quantum systems on a quantum computer, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 454
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. J. Daley, C. Kollath, U. Schollwöck, and G. Vidal, Time-dependent density-matrix renormalization-group using adaptive effective hilbert spaces, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
V. V. Shende, I. L. Markov, and S. S. Bullock, Minimal universal two-qubit controlled-not-based circuits, Phys. Rev. A 69
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Hatano and M. Suzuki, Finding exponential product formulas of higher orders, in Quantum Annealing and Other Optimization Methods (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005) pp. 37–68
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. J. García-Ripoll, Time evolution of matrix product states, New Journal of Physics 8
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
I. Kassal, S. P. Jordan, P. J. Love, M. Mohseni, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Polynomial-time quantum algorithm for the simulation of chemical dynamics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Jordan, R. Orús, G. Vidal, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in two spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Vidal, Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems, Advances in Physics 57
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Algorithms for entanglement renormalization, Phys. Rev. B 79
2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. B. Hastings, Light-cone matrix product, Journal of Mathematical Physics 50
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Kassal, J. D. Whitfield, A. Perdomo-Ortiz, M.-H. Yung, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Simulating chemistry using quantum computers, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 62
2011
Cited alongside, same era.
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
J. C. Garcia-Escartin and P. Chamorro-Posada, Swap test and hong-ou-mandel effect are equivalent, Phys. Rev. A 87
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O’Brien, A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Nature Communications 5
K. Mitarai and K. Fujii, Methodology for replacing indirect measurements with direct measurements, Phys. Rev. Research 1
2019
Later among the works it cites.
S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, Quantum computational chemistry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92
2020
Closest in time.
B. Bauer, S. Bravyi, M. Motta, and G. K.-L. Chan, Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science, Chemical Reviews 120
2020
Closest in time.
C. Cirstoiu, Z. Holmes, J. Iosue, L. Cincio, P. J. Coles, and A. Sornborger, Variational fast forwarding for quantum simulation beyond the coherence time, npj Quantum Information 6
2020
Closest in time.
M. Lubasch, J. Joo, P. Moinier, M. Kiffner, and D. Jaksch, Variational quantum algorithms for nonlinear problems, Phys. Rev. A 101
2020
Closest in time.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
R. Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Annals of Physics 349
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, New Journal of Physics 18
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Y. Li and S. C. Benjamin, Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization, Phys. Rev. X 7
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets, Nature 549
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
J. Li, X. Yang, X. Peng, and C.-P. Sun, Hybrid quantum-classical approach to quantum optimal control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Jaderberg, A. Agarwal, K. Leonhardt, M. Kiffner, and D. Jaksch, Minimum hardware requirements for hybrid quantum–classical DMFT, Quantum Science and Technology 5
2020
Closest in time.
K. M. Nakanishi, K. Fujii, and S. Todo, Sequential minimal optimization for quantum-classical hybrid algorithms, Phys. Rev. Research 2
2020
Closest in time.
P. J. Ollitrault, A. Baiardi, M. Reiher, and I. Tavernelli, Hardware efficient quantum algorithms for vibrational structure calculations, Chem. Sci. 11
2020
Closest in time.
J. Liu, L. Wan, Z. Li, and J. Yang, Simulating periodic systems on a quantum computer using molecular orbitals, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 16
2020
Closest in time.
B. Fauseweh and J.-X. Zhu, Digital quantum simulation of non-equilibrium quantum many-body systems, Quantum Information Processing 20
2021
Closest in time.
S.-H. Lin, R. Dilip, A. G. Green, A. Smith, and F. Pollmann, Real- and imaginary-time evolution with compressed quantum circuits, PRX Quantum 2
2021
Closest in time.
F. Barratt, J. Dborin, M. Bal, V. Stojevic, F. Pollmann, and A. G. Green, Parallel quantum simulation of large systems on small nisq computers, npj Quantum Information 7
2021
Closest in time.
M. Ostaszewski, E. Grant, and M. Benedetti, Structure optimization for parameterized quantum circuits, Quantum 5
2021
Closest in time.
H. L. Tang, V. Shkolnikov, G. S. Barron, H. R. Grimsley, N. J. Mayhall, E. Barnes, and S. E. Economou, Qubit-adapt-vqe: An adaptive algorithm for constructing hardware-efficient ansätze on a quantum processor, PRX Quantum 2
2021
Closest in time.
M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, J. M. Pino, and A. C. Potter, Holographic quantum algorithms for simulating correlated spin systems, Phys. Rev. Research 3
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
2021
Closest in time.
J. Borregaard, M. Christandl, and D. Stilck França, Noise-robust exploration of many-body quantum states on near-term quantum devices, npj Quantum Information 7
2021
Closest in time.