Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Building robust deep learning-based models requires large quantities of diverse training data.
Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics pp. 159–174 (1977)
1977
Earlier work this paper cites.
Boyd, N., Byng, J., Jong, R., Fishell, E., Little, L., Miller, A., Lockwood, G., Tritchler, D., Yaffe, M.J.: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the canadian national breast screening study. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 87
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Pisano, E.D., Gatsonis, C., Hendrick, E., Yaffe, M., Baum, J.K., Acharyya, S., Conant, E.F., Fajardo, L.L., Bassett, L., D’Orsi, C., et al.: Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. New England Journal of Medicine 353
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
Boyd, N.F., Guo, H., Martin, L.J., Sun, L., Stone, J., Fishell, E., Jong, R.A., Hislop, G., Chiarelli, A., Minkin, S., et al.: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. New England journal of medicine 356
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ooms, E., Zonderland, H., Eijkemans, M., Kriege, M., Delavary, B.M., Burger, C., Ansink, A.: Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment. The Breast 16
2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Razzaghi, H., Troester, M.A., Gierach, G.L., Olshan, A.F., Yankaskas, B.C., Millikan, R.C.: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in white and african american women. Breast cancer research and treatment 135
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Spayne, M.C., Gard, C.C., Skelly, J., Miglioretti, D.L., Vacek, P.M., Geller, B.M.: Reproducibility of bi-rads breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study. The breast journal 18
2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Sickles, E., d’Orsi, C., Bassett, L., Appleton, C., Berg, W., Burnside, E., et al.: ACR BI-RADS® mammography. ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system 5
2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Ho, J.M., Jafferjee, N., Covarrubias, G.M., Ghesani, M., Handler, B.: Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options. American Journal of Roentgenology 203
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Sprague, B.L., Gangnon, R.E., Burt, V., Trentham-Dietz, A., Hampton, J.M., Wellman, R.D., Kerlikowske, K., Miglioretti, D.L.: Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the united states. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 106
2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Sprague, B.L., Conant, E.F., Onega, T., Garcia, M.P., Beaber, E.F., Herschorn, S.D., Lehman, C.D., Tosteson, A.N., Lacson, R., Schnall, M.D., et al.: Variation in mammographic breast density assessments among radiologists in clinical practice: a multicenter observational study. Annals of internal medicine 165
2016
Cited alongside, same era.
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., Weinberger, K.Q.: Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 4700–4708 (2017)
Dunnmon, J.A., Yi, D., Langlotz, C.P., Ré, C., Rubin, D.L., Lungren, M.P.: Assessment of convolutional neural networks for automated classification of chest radiographs. Radiology 290
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Lehman, C.D., Yala, A., Schuster, T., Dontchos, B., Bahl, M., Swanson, K., Barzilay, R.: Mammographic breast density assessment using deep learning: clinical implementation. Radiology 290
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Li, W., Milletarì, F., Xu, D., Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Zhu, W., Baust, M., Cheng, Y., Ourselin, S., Cardoso, M.J., et al.: Privacy-preserving federated brain tumour segmentation. In: International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging. pp. 133–141. Springer (2019)
2019
Later among the works it cites.
Chang, K., Beers, A.L., Brink, L., Patel, J.B., Singh, P., Arun, N.T., Hoebel, K.V., Gaw, N., Shah, M., Pisano, E.D., et al.: Multi-institutional assessment and crowdsourcing evaluation of deep learning for automated classification of breast density. Journal of the American College of Radiology (2020)
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., y Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. pp. 1273–1282 (2017)
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Chang, K., Balachandar, N., Lam, C., Yi, D., Brown, J., Beers, A., Rosen, B., Rubin, D.L., Kalpathy-Cramer, J.: Distributed deep learning networks among institutions for medical imaging. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 25
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Karani, N., Chaitanya, K., Baumgartner, C., Konukoglu, E.: A lifelong learning approach to brain mr segmentation across scanners and protocols. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. pp. 476–484. Springer (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Sheller, M.J., Reina, G.A., Edwards, B., Martin, J., Bakas, S.: Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data: A feasibility study on brain tumor segmentation. In: International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop. pp. 92–104. Springer (2018)
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
2020
Closest in time.
Kaissis, G.A., Makowski, M.R., Rückert, D., Braren, R.F.: Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging. Nature Machine Intelligence pp. 1–7 (2020)
2020
Closest in time.
Larson, D.B., Magnus, D.C., Lungren, M.P., Shah, N.H., Langlotz, C.P.: Ethics of using and sharing clinical imaging data for artificial intelligence: a proposed framework. Radiology p. 192536 (2020)
2020
Closest in time.
2020
Closest in time.