Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Many dynamic processes, including common scenarios in robotic control and reinforcement learning (RL), involve a set of interacting subprocesses.
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Clive WJ Granger · 1969
Earlier work this paper cites.
Dyna, an integrated architecture for learning, planning, and reacting
Richard S Sutton · 1991
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q-learning
Christopher JCH Watkins and Peter Dayan · 1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
Learning to achieve goals
Leslie Pack Kaelbling · 1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
Exploiting structure in policy construction
Craig Boutilier, Richard Dearden, Moises Goldszmidt, et al · 1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
Efficient reinforcement learning in factored mdps
Michael Kearns and Daphne Koller · 1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
Causation, prediction, and search
Peter Spirtes, Clark N Glymour, Richard Scheines, and David Heckerman · 2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
Efficient solution algorithms for factored mdps
Carlos Guestrin, Daphne Koller, Ronald Parr, and Shobha Venkataraman · 2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
An object-oriented representation for efficient reinforcement learning
Carlos Diuk, Andre Cohen, and Michael L Littman · 2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
Causal inference in statistics: An overview
Judea Pearl · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Causality and statistical learning, 2011
Andrew Gelman · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Controlling selection bias in causal inference
Elias Bareinboim and Judea Pearl · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
The arcade learning environment: An evaluation platform for general agents
Marc G Bellemare, Yavar Naddaf, Joel Veness, and Michael Bowling · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Context-specific independence in bayesian networks
Craig Boutilier, Nir Friedman, Moises Goldszmidt, and Daphne Koller · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Recovering from selection bias in causal and statistical inference
Elias Bareinboim, Jin Tian, and Judea Pearl · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Offline policy evaluation across representations with applications to educational games
Travis Mandel, Yun-En Liu, Sergey Levine, Emma Brunskill, and Zoran Popovic · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming
Martin L Puterman · 2014
Earlier work this paper cites.
Made: Masked autoencoder for distribution estimation
Mathieu Germain, Karol Gregor, Iain Murray, and Hugo Larochelle · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Off-policy model-based learning under unknown factored dynamics
Assaf Hallak, François Schnitzler, Timothy Mann, and Shie Mannor · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
Timothy P Lillicrap, Jonathan J Hunt, Alexander Pritzel, Nicolas Heess, Tom Erez, Yuval Tassa, David Silver, and Daan Wierstra · 2015
Earlier work this paper cites.
Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings
Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, James Y Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and Adam T Kalai · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Greg Brockman, Vicki Cheung, Ludwig Pettersson, Jonas Schneider, John Schulman, Jie Tang, and Wojciech Zaremba · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gaussian error linear units (gelus)
Dan Hendrycks and Kevin Gimpel · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
The malmo platform for artificial intelligence experimentation
Matthew Johnson, Katja Hofmann, Tim Hutton, and David Bignell · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Safe and efficient off-policy reinforcement learning
Rémi Munos, Tom Stepleton, Anna Harutyunyan, and Marc Bellemare · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Data-efficient off-policy policy evaluation for reinforcement learning
Philip Thomas and Emma Brunskill · 2016
Earlier work this paper cites.
Hindsight experience replay
Marcin Andrychowicz, Filip Wolski, Alex Ray, Jonas Schneider, Rachel Fong, Peter Welinder, Bob McGrew, Josh Tobin, OpenAI Pieter Abbeel, and Wojciech Zaremba · 2017
Earlier work this paper cites.
Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Value-aware loss function for model-based reinforcement learning
Amir-massoud Farahmand, Andre Barreto, and Daniel Nikovski · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Roboschool, 2017
Oleg Klimov and John Schulman · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Multi-agent actor-critic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments
Ryan Lowe, Yi Wu, Aviv Tamar, Jean Harb, OpenAI Pieter Abbeel, and Igor Mordatch · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Value prediction network
Junhyuk Oh, Satinder Singh, and Honglak Lee · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning
Structured disentangled representations
Babak Esmaeili, Hao Wu, Sarthak Jain, Alican Bozkurt, N Siddharth, Brooks Paige, Dana H Brooks, Jennifer Dy, and Jan-Willem Meent · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Diagnosing bottlenecks in deep q-learning algorithms
Justin Fu, Aviral Kumar, Matthew Soh, and Sergey Levine · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Counterfactual fairness in text classification through robustness
Sahaj Garg, Vincent Perot, Nicole Limtiaco, Ankur Taly, Ed H Chi, and Alex Beutel · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Recurrent independent mechanisms
Anirudh Goyal, Alex Lamb, Jordan Hoffmann, Shagun Sodhani, Sergey Levine, Yoshua Bengio, and Bernhard Schölkopf · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
When to trust your model: Model-based policy optimization
Michael Janner, Justin Fu, Marvin Zhang, and Sergey Levine · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Luis Perez and Jason Wang · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Elements of causal inference: foundations and learning algorithms
Jonas Peters, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Schölkopf · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Certifying some distributional robustness with principled adversarial training
Aman Sinha, Hongseok Namkoong, and John Duchi · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Attention is all you need
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep sets
Manzil Zaheer, Satwik Kottur, Siamak Ravanbakhsh, Barnabas Poczos, Russ R Salakhutdinov, and Alexander J Smola · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Quantifying generalization in reinforcement learning
Karl Cobbe, Oleg Klimov, Chris Hesse, Taehoon Kim, and John Schulman · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Counterfactual multi-agent policy gradients
Jakob N Foerster, Gregory Farquhar, Triantafyllos Afouras, Nantas Nardelli, and Shimon Whiteson · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Contrastive learning of structured world models
Thomas Kipf, Elise van der Pol, and Max Welling · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Gradient-based neural dag learning
Sébastien Lachapelle, Philippe Brouillard, Tristan Deleu, and Simon Lacoste-Julien · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Towards practical multi-object manipulation using relational reinforcement learning
Richard Li, Allan Jabri, Trevor Darrell, and Pulkit Agrawal · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Sdrl: Interpretable and data-efficient deep reinforcement learning leveraging symbolic planning
Daoming Lyu, Fangkai Yang, Bo Liu, and Steven Gustafson · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Explainable reinforcement learning through a causal lens
Prashan Madumal, Tim Miller, Liz Sonenberg, and Frank Vetere · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Towards interpretable reinforcement learning using attention augmented agents
Alexander Mott, Daniel Zoran, Mike Chrzanowski, Daan Wierstra, and Danilo Jimenez Rezende · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Counterfactual off-policy evaluation with gumbel-max structural causal models
Michael Oberst and David Sontag · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Protoge: Prototype goal encodings for multi-goal reinforcement learning
Silviu Pitis, Harris Chan, and Jimmy Ba · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Inferring causation from time series in earth system sciences
Jakob Runge, Sebastian Bathiany, Erik Bollt, Gustau Camps-Valls, Dim Coumou, Ethan Deyle, Clark Glymour, Marlene Kretschmer, Miguel D Mahecha, Jordi Muñoz-Marí, et al · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Can you trust your model’s uncertainty? evaluating predictive uncertainty under dataset shift
Jasper Snoek, Yaniv Ovadia, Emily Fertig, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Sebastian Nowozin, D Sculley, Joshua Dillon, Jie Ren, and Zachary Nado · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Monkeys are curious about counterfactual outcomes
Maya Zhe Wang and Benjamin Y Hayden · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Benchmarking model-based reinforcement learning
Tingwu Wang, Xuchan Bao, Ignasi Clavera, Jerrick Hoang, Yeming Wen, Eric Langlois, Shunshi Zhang, Guodong Zhang, Pieter Abbeel, and Jimmy Ba · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Nicholas Watters, Loic Matthey, Matko Bosnjak, Christopher P Burgess, and Alexander Lerchner · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Credit assignment techniques in stochastic computation graphs
Théophane Weber, Nicolas Heess, Lars Buesing, and David Silver · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Learning dexterous in-hand manipulation
OpenAI: Marcin Andrychowicz, Bowen Baker, Maciek Chociej, Rafal Jozefowicz, Bob McGrew, Jakub Pachocki, Arthur Petron, Matthias Plappert, Glenn Powell, Alex Ray, et al · 2020
Closest in time.
Unsupervised disentanglement of pose, appearance and background from images and videos
Aysegul Dundar, Kevin J Shih, Animesh Garg, Robert Pottorf, Andrew Tao, and Bryan Catanzaro · 2020
Closest in time.
Causal inference: What if
MA Hernán and JM Robins · 2020
Closest in time.
Image augmentation is all you need: Regularizing deep reinforcement learning from pixels
Ilya Kostrikov, Denis Yarats, and Rob Fergus · 2020
Closest in time.
Discor: Corrective feedback in reinforcement learning via distribution correction
Aviral Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, and Sergey Levine · 2020
Closest in time.
Reinforcement learning with augmented data
Michael Laskin, Kimin Lee, Adam Stooke, Lerrel Pinto, Pieter Abbeel, and Aravind Srinivas · 2020
Closest in time.
Offline reinforcement learning: Tutorial, review, and perspectives on open problems
Sergey Levine, Aviral Kumar, George Tucker, and Justin Fu · 2020
Closest in time.
Weakly-supervised disentanglement without compromises
Francesco Locatello, Ben Poole, Gunnar Rätsch, Bernhard Schölkopf, Olivier Bachem, and Michael Tschannen · 2020
Closest in time.
Causally correct partial models for reinforcement learning
Danilo J Rezende, Ivo Danihelka, George Papamakarios, Nan Rosemary Ke, Ray Jiang, Theophane Weber, Karol Gregor, Hamza Merzic, Fabio Viola, Jane Wang, et al · 2020
Closest in time.
Yannick Schroecker and Charles Isbell · 2020
Closest in time.