Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
What do data tell us about physics-and what don't they tell us? There has been a surge of interest in using machine learning models to discover governing physical laws such as differential equations from data, but current methods lack uncertainty quantification to communicate their credibility.
Detecting strange attractors in turbulence
Floris Takens · 1981
Earlier work this paper cites.
Principal differential analysis: Data reduction by differential operators
Jim O Ramsay · 1996
Earlier work this paper cites.
Bayesian inference for the uncertainty distribution of computer model outputs
Jeremy Oakley and Anthony O’Hagan · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Exponential time differencing for stiff systems
Steven M Cox and Paul C Matthews · 2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gaussian processes for machine learning
Christopher KI Williams and Carl Edward Rasmussen · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gaussian process dynamical models
Jack Wang, Aaron Hertzmann, and David J Fleet · 2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems
Josh Bongard and Hod Lipson · 2007
Earlier work this paper cites.
Variational learning of inducing variables in sparse gaussian processes
Michalis Titsias · 2009
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization
John Duchi, Elad Hazan, and Yoram Singer · 2011
Earlier work this paper cites.
Neural networks for machine learning lecture 6a overview of mini-batch gradient descent
Geoffrey Hinton, Nitish Srivastava, and Kevin Swersky · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method
Matthew D Zeiler · 2012
Earlier work this paper cites.
On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning
Ilya Sutskever, James Martens, George Dahl, and Geoffrey Hinton · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Gaussian processes for big data
James Hensman, Nicolo Fusi, and Neil D Lawrence · 2013
Earlier work this paper cites.
Multi-output separable gaussian process: Towards an efficient, fully bayesian paradigm for uncertainty quantification
Ilias Bilionis, Nicholas Zabaras, Bledar A Konomi, and Guang Lin · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Bayesian inference and learning in gaussian process state-space models with particle mcmc
Roger Frigola, Fredrik Lindsten, Thomas B Schön, and Carl Edward Rasmussen · 2013
Cited alongside, same era.
Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Variational gaussian process state-space models
Roger Frigola, Yutian Chen, and Carl Edward Rasmussen · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Chebfun guide, 2014
Tobin A Driscoll, Nicholas Hale, and Lloyd N Trefethen · 2014
Cited alongside, same era.
Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations
Closed-form inference and prediction in gaussian process state-space models
Alessandro Davide Ialongo, Mark van der Wilk, and Carl Edward Rasmussen · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Non-factorised variational inference in dynamical systems
Alessandro Davide Ialongo, Mark van der Wilk, James Hensman, and Carl Edward Rasmussen · 2018
Later among the works it cites.
Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library
Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations
Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George E Karniadakis · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Data-driven discovery of free-form governing differential equations
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
Samuel H Rudy, Steven L Brunton, Joshua L Proctor, and J Nathan Kutz · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George Em Karniadakis · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
Identification of gaussian process state space models
Stefanos Eleftheriadis, Tom Nicholson, Marc Deisenroth, and James Hensman · 2017
Cited alongside, same era.
JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, 2018
James Bradbury, Roy Frostig, Peter Hawkins, Matthew James Johnson, Chris Leary, Dougal Maclaurin, and Skye Wanderman-Milne · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Neural ordinary differential equations
Tian Qi Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David K Duvenaud · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Deep hidden physics models: Deep learning of nonlinear partial differential equations
Maziar Raissi · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Numerical gaussian processes for time-dependent and nonlinear partial differential equations
Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George Em Karniadakis · 2018
Cited alongside, same era.
Steven Atkinson, Waad Subber, Liping Wang, Genghis Khan, Philippe Hawi, and Roger Ghanem · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Learning symbolic physics with graph networks
Miles D Cranmer, Rui Xu, Peter Battaglia, and Shirley Ho · 2019
Later among the works it cites.
Liu Yang, Xuhui Meng, and George Em Karniadakis · 2020
Closest in time.
Uncovering differential equations from data with hidden variables
Agustín Somacal, Leonardo Boechi, Matthieu Jonckheere, Vincent Lefieux, Dominique Picard, and Ezequiel Smucler · 2020
Closest in time.
Understanding and mitigating gradient pathologies in physics-informed neural networks
Sifan Wang, Yujun Teng, and Paris Perdikaris · 2020
Closest in time.
Adaptive activation functions accelerate convergence in deep and physics-informed neural networks
Ameya D Jagtap, Kenji Kawaguchi, and George Em Karniadakis · 2020
Closest in time.
Khemraj Shukla, Patricio Clark Di Leoni, James Blackshire, Daniel Sparkman, and George Em Karniadakis · 2020
Closest in time.
Xiaowei Jin, Shengze Cai, Hui Li, and George Em Karniadakis · 2020
Closest in time.