Built on

J. Ryan, Y. Chen and B. Ratra, Baryon acoustic oscillation, Hubble parameter, and angular size measurement constraints on the Hubble constant, dark energy dynamics, and spatial curvature
Original
1902
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. D’Agostino, Holographic dark energy from nonadditive entropy: cosmological perturbations and observational constraints
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri and D. Scolnic, Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond Λ \Lambda CDM
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and E. N. Saridakis, Holographic inflation
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Sadri, Observational constraints on interacting Tsallis holographic dark energy model
Original
1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
Z. Molavi and A. Khodam-Mohammadi, Observational tests of Gauss-Bonnet like dark energy model
Original
1906
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. K. Anagnostopoulos, S. Basilakos and E. N. Saridakis, Bayesian analysis of f ⁡ ( T ) f(T) gravity using f σ 8 f\sigma_{8} data
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. Aditya, S. Mandal, P. Sahoo and D. Reddy, Observational constraint on interacting Tsallis holographic dark energy in logarithmic Brans–Dicke theory
Original
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. Q. Geng, Y. T. Hsu, J. R. Lu and L. Yin, Modified Cosmology Models from Thermodynamical Approach
Original
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification
1974
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. Schwarz, Estimating the dimension of a model
1978
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity
1980
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. A. Olive, Inflation
1990
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Gelman and D. B. Rubin, Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
G. ’t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity
1993
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Susskind, The World as a hologram
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. E. Kass and A. E. Raftery, Bayes Factors
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Jeffreys, The theory of probability
1998
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Effective field theory, black holes, and the cosmological constant
1999
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Horava and D. Minic, Probable values of the cosmological constant in a holographic theory
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Bousso, The Holographic principle
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Jimenez and A. Loeb, Constraining cosmological parameters based on relative galaxy ages
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. J. Spiegelhalter, N. G. Best, B. P. Carlin, A. V. D. Linde, Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. Anderson, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Moresco, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, A. Cimatti and L. Pozzetti, Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers. II. Impact of Stellar Population Synthesis Models Systematics and Full Covariance Matrix
Original
2003
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Non-Gaussianity from inflation: Theory and observations
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Li, A Model of holographic dark energy
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
R. Horvat, Holography and variable cosmological constant
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Q. G. Huang and M. Li, The Holographic dark energy in a non-flat universe
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
Y. g. Gong, Extended holographic dark energy
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

J. D. Barrow, The Area of a Rough Black Hole
Original
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
K. P. Burnham, D. R. Anderson, Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Modified Gauss-Bonnet theory as gravitational alternative for dark energy
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Pavon and W. Zimdahl, Holographic dark energy and cosmic coincidence
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Wang, Y. g. Gong and E. Abdalla, Transition of the dark energy equation of state in an interacting holographic dark energy model
2005
Cited alongside, same era.
X. Zhang and F. Q. Wu, Constraints on holographic dark energy from Type Ia supernova observations

Then

S. M. R. Micheletti, Observational constraints on holographic tachyonic dark energy in interaction with dark matter
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
Y. Gong and T. Li, A Modified Holographic Dark Energy Model with Infrared Infinite Extra Dimension(s)
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
M. Suwa and T. Nihei, Observational constraints on the interacting Ricci dark energy model
Original
2010
Later among the works it cites.
S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models
Original
2011
Later among the works it cites.
S. H. Chen, J. B. Dent, S. Dutta and E. N. Saridakis, Cosmological perturbations in f(T) gravity

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2020

Observational constraints on Barrow holographic dark energy

Anagnostopoulos, Fotios K., Basilakos, Spyros, Saridakis, Emmanuel N.

Understand

We use observational data from Supernovae (SNIa) Pantheon sample, as well as from direct measurements of the Hubble parameter from the cosmic chronometers (CC) sample, in order to extract constraints on the scenario of Barrow holographic dark energy.

The latter is a holographic dark energy model based on the recently proposed Barrow entropy, which arises from the modification of the black-hole surface due to quantum-gravitational effects.
We first consider the case where the new deformation exponent $\Delta$ is the sole model parameter, and we show that although the standard value $\Delta=0$, which corresponds to zero deformation, lies within the 1$\sigma$ region, a deviation is favored.
In the case where we let both $\Delta$ and the second model parameter to be free we find that a deviation from standard holographic dark energy is preferred.