Built on

C. D. Kreisch, F. Y. Cyr-Racine and O. Doré, Phys. Rev. D 101
Original
1902
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri and D. Scolnic, Astrophys. J. 876
Original
1903
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Agrawal, F. Y. Cyr-Racine, D. Pinner and L. Randall, arXiv:1904.01016 [astro-ph.CO]
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Alexander and E. McDonough, Phys. Lett. B 797
Original
1904
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Blinov, K. J. Kelly, G. Z. Krnjaic and S. D. McDermott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123
Original
1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. X. Lin, G. Benevento, W. Hu and M. Raveri, Phys. Rev. D 100
Original
1905
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Rossi, M. Ballardini, M. Braglia, F. Finelli, D. Paoletti, A. A. Starobinsky and C. Umiltà, Phys. Rev. D 100
Original
1906
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Verde, T. Treu and A. G. Riess, Nature Astronomy 2019 doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 [arXiv:1907.10625 [astro-ph.CO]]
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. L. Freedman et al
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. C. Wong et al
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
N. Aghanim et al
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Desmond, B. Jain and J. Sakstein, Phys. Rev. D 100
Original
1907
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. Yuan, A. G. Riess, L. M. Macri, S. Casertano and D. Scolnic, Astrophys. J. 886
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
L. Knox and M. Millea, Phys. Rev. D 101
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
T. L. Smith, V. Poulin and M. A. Amin, Phys. Rev. D 101
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
C. D. Huang et al
Original
1908
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Solà Peracaula, A. Gomez-Valent, J. de Cruz Pérez and C. Moreno-Pulido, Astrophys. J. Lett. 886
Original
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
E. Bellini, I. Sawicki and M. Zumalacárregui, JCAP 2002
Original
1909
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Lewis, arXiv:1910.13970 [astro-ph.IM]
Original
1910
Earlier work this paper cites.
K. V. Berghaus and T. Karwal, Phys. Rev. D 101
Original
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Sakstein and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124
Original
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110
Original
1971
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Boisseau, G. Esposito-Farese, D. Polarski and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85
2000
Earlier work this paper cites.
W. L. Freedman et al
Original
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.

Similar

A. Riazuelo and J. P. Uzan, Phys. Rev. D 66
2002
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Zumalacarregui, arXiv:2003.06396 [astro-ph.CO]
Original
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
B. Bertotti, L. Iess and P. Tortora, Nature 425
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
H. Desmond and J. Sakstein, arXiv:2003.12876 [astro-ph.CO]
Original
2003
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Ballardini, M. Braglia, F. Finelli, D. Paoletti, A. A. Starobinsky and C. Umiltà, arXiv:2004.14349 [astro-ph.CO]
Original
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
C. J. Copi, A. N. Davis and L. M. Krauss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92

Then

C. Umiltà, M. Ballardini, F. Finelli and D. Paoletti, JCAP 1508
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W. J. Percival, A. Burden and M. Manera, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 449
Original
2015
Later among the works it cites.
J. L. Bernal, L. Verde and A. G. Riess, JCAP 1610
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, C. Umiltà and D. Paoletti, JCAP 1605
Original
2016
Later among the works it cites.
L. Lancaster, F. Y. Cyr-Racine, L. Knox and Z. Pan, JCAP 1707
Original
2017

Beyond the bibliography

alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.

Open on alphaXiv

alphaXiv is searching for related work…

Reading the bibliography…

2020

A larger value for $H_0$ by an evolving gravitational constant

Braglia, Matteo, Ballardini, Mario, Emond, William T. et al.

Understand

We provide further evidence that a massless cosmological scalar field with a non-minimal coupling to the Ricci curvature of the type $M^2_{\rm pl}(1+\xi \sigma^n/M_{\rm pl}^n) $ alleviates the existing tension between local measurements of the Hubble constant and its inference from CMB anisotropies and baryonic acoustic oscillations data in presence of a cosmological constant.

In these models, the expansion history is modified compared to $\Lambda$CDM at early time, mimicking a change in the effective number of relativistic species, and gravity weakens after matter-radiation equality.
Compared to $\Lambda$CDM, a quadratic ($n=2$) coupling increases the Hubble constant when {\em Planck} 2018 (alone or in combination with BAO and SH0ES) measurements data are used in the analysis.
Negative values of the coupling, for which the scalar field decreases, seem favored and consistency with Solar System can be naturally achieved for a large portion of the parameter space without the need of any screening mechanism.