Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Matrix Product States form the basis of powerful simulation methods for ground state problems in one dimension.
S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups , Phys. Rev. Lett. 69
1992
Earlier work this paper cites.
S. Östlund and S. Rommer, Thermodynamic Limit of Density Matrix Renormalization , Phys. Rev. Lett. 75
1995
Earlier work this paper cites.
D. Werner, Funktionalanalysis (Springer, 1997)
1997
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. M. Terhal, M. Horodecki, D. W. Leung, and D. P. DiVincenzo, The entanglement of purification , J. Math. Phys. 43
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
F. Verstraete, D. Porras, and J. I. Cirac, DMRG and periodic boundary conditions: a quantum information perspective , Phys. Rev. Lett. 93
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
P. Hayden, D. Leung, P. W. Shor, and A. Winter, Aspects of generic entanglement , Commun. Math. Phys. 250
2004
Cited alongside, same era.
F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully , Phys. Rev. B 73
2006
Cited alongside, same era.
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, M. B. Hastings, and J. I. Cirac, Area laws in quantum systems: mutual information and correlations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 100
2008
Cited alongside, same era.
2009
Cited alongside, same era.
2011
Later among the works it cites.
2014
Later among the works it cites.
2017
Later among the works it cites.
2017
Later among the works it cites.
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
N. Schuch, Condensed Matter Applications of Entanglement Theory , arXiv:1306.5551
Cited in the paper.
Note that due to the monotonicity of the α \alpha -Rényi entropy in α \alpha , we can also choose any smaller α \alpha in ( 3
Cited in the paper.
This is readily checked by working in the two-dimensional space spanned by the two vectors; note that | χ D ⟩ |\chi_{D}\rangle need not be normalized
Cited in the paper.
Different purifications are related by a unitary on the purifying system A ′ B ′ A^{\prime}B^{\prime} , which however mixes A ′ A^{\prime} and B ′ B^{\prime} and thus changes the entanglement properties
Cited in the paper.
Specifically, ‖ P 1 ( X ) ‖ 1 \displaystyle\|P_{1}(X)\|_{1} ≤ ∑ ‖ A ^ i ⊗ tr A [ ( A ^ i ′ ⊗ 𝟙 ) † 𝕏 ] ‖ 𝟙 \displaystyle\leq\sum\displaylimits\|\hat{A}_{i}\otimes\mathrm{tr}_{A}[(\hat{A}_{i}^{\prime}\otimes\openone)^{\dagger}X]\|_{1} = ∑ ‖ A ^ i ‖ 1 ‖ tr A [ ( A ^ i ′ ⊗ 𝟙 ) † 𝕏 ] ‖ 𝟙 \displaystyle=\sum\displaylimits\|\hat{A}_{i}\|_{1}\|\mathrm{tr}_{A}[(\hat{A}_{i}^{\prime}\otimes\openone)^{\dagger}X]\|_{1} ≤ ( ∗ ) ∑ ∥ A ^ i ∥ 1 ∥ ( A ^ i ′ ⊗ 𝟙 ) † 𝕏 ] ∥ 𝟙 \displaystyle\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\smash{(*)}}}{{\leq}}\sum\displaylimits\|\hat{A}_{i}\|_{1}\|(\hat{A}_{i}^{\prime}\otimes\openone)^{\dagger}X]\|_{1} ≤ ∑ ‖ A ^ i ‖ 1 ‖ A ^ i ′ ⊗ 𝟙 ‖ ∞ ‖ 𝕏 ‖ 𝟙 \displaystyle\leq\sum\displaylimits\|\hat{A}_{i}\|_{1}\|\hat{A}_{i}^{\prime}\otimes\openone\|_{\infty}\|X\|_{1} ≤ ∑ ‖ A ^ i ‖ 1 ‖ A ^ i ′ ‖ ∞ ‖ X ‖ 1 , \displaystyle\leq\sum\displaylimits\|\hat{A}_{i}\|_{1}\|\hat{A}_{i}^{\prime}\|_{\infty}\|X\|_{1}\ , where ( ∗ ) (*) uses the contractivity of the partial trace
Cited in the paper.
2024
Closest in time.