Fetching the paper…
Reading the bibliography…
Automatically understanding the rhetorical roles of sentences in a legal case judgement is an important problem to solve, since it can help in several downstream tasks like summarization of legal judgments, legal search, and so on.
1911
Earlier work this paper cites.
J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. C. N. Pereira, “Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data,” 2001
2001
Earlier work this paper cites.
H. Cunningham, D. Maynard, K. Bontcheva, and V. Tablan, “GATE: A Framework and Graphical Development Environment for Robust NLP Tools and Applications,” in
2002
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Farzindar and G. Lapalme, “Letsum, an automatic legal text summarizing system,” 2004
2004
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Graves, S. Fernández, and J. Schmidhuber, “Bidirectional LSTM Networks for Improved Phoneme Classification and Recognition,” in
2005
Earlier work this paper cites.
B. Hachey and C. Grover, “Extractive summarisation of legal texts,”
2006
Earlier work this paper cites.
M. Saravanan, B. Ravindran, and S. Raman, “Automatic Identification of Rhetorical Roles using Conditional Random Fields for Legal Document Summarization,” in
2008
Earlier work this paper cites.
A. Wyner, “Towards annotating and extracting textual legal case elements,”
2010
Cited alongside, same era.
G. Venturi, “Design and development of temis: a syntactically and semantically annotated corpus of italian legislative texts,” in
2012
Cited alongside, same era.
A. Z. Wyner, W. Peters, and D. Katz, “A case study on legal case annotation,” in
2013
Cited alongside, same era.
I. Nejadghoii, R. Bougueng, and S. Witherspoon, “A semi-supervised training method for semantic search of legal facts in canadian immigration cases,” in
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
O. Shulayeva, A. Siddharthan, and A. Z. Wyner, “Recognizing cited facts and principles in legal judgements,”
2017
Cited alongside, same era.
P. Wang, Z. Yang, S. Niu, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, and S. Niu, “Modeling dynamic pairwise attention for crime classification over legal articles,” in
2018
Later among the works it cites.
P. Bhattacharya, K. Hiware, S. Rajgaria, N. Pochhi, K. Ghosh, and S. Ghosh, “A comparative study of summarization algorithms applied to legal case judgments,” in
2019
Closest in time.
V. R. Walker, K. Pillaipakkamnatt, A. M. Davidson, M. Linares, and D. J. Pesce, “Automatic Classification of Rhetorical Roles for Sentences: Comparing Rule-Based Scripts with Machine Learning,” in
2019
Closest in time.
P. Wang, Y. Fan, S. Niu, Z. Yang, Y. Zhang, and J. Guo, “Hierarchical matching network for crime classification,” in
2019
Closest in time.
C.-L. Liu and K.-C. Chen, “Extracting the gist of chinese judgments of the supreme court,” in
2019
alphaXiv searches the wider corpus for related work and actual follow-ups.
alphaXiv is searching for related work…
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
D. Jin and P. Szolovits, “Hierarchical neural networks for sequential sentence classification in medical scientific abstracts,” in
2018
Cited alongside, same era.
M. Saravanan, “Ontology-Based Retrieval and Automatic Summarization of Legal Judgments.”
Cited in the paper.
Closest in time.
G. Sanchez, “Sentence boundary detection in legal text,” in
2019
Closest in time.